Topic: Hell-Of-A NutShell

A John Lash / MetaHistory "Digest":

The ET Deception

http://www.metahistory.org/ETDeception.php

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/siriarc/tn-holyfirekundalini.jpg

11   23   11

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

One more disinformation site to the list...

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

Why do you say that, Pictus?

4 (edited by Pictus 2006-02-23 12:32:58)

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

Quotes from http://www.metahistory.org/ETDeception.php

“The seers of the ancient Pagan Mysteries observed that Archontic entities are present in the solar system, but they are not native to the earth as we are."

We are ?

"I believe that the Archons are the most immediate and intimate threat to humanity."

No commentary needed. smile

For *me*, absolute disinformation there to divert from the true.
He mixes different things and throw a new wrong meaning.
A tutifruti of wrong conceptions.
He uses LSD too much...
He falls to the tricksters trick and want to trick the others.
I put that stuff at the same bag with scientology…

I think he must desintoxicate his body from the heavy drugs and
after that, start reading good stuff like the wonderful  http://www.montalk.net/

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

Pictus wrote:

A tutifruti of wrong conceptions.

Funny phrase, it describes a lot of material out there.

Actually, I largely agreed with what was in this article and thought it made good points. The term "Archons" is the Tradition's (Gnostic/Esoteric-Christian) term for what are basically the same self-serving hyperdimensional entities we have discussed on this forum. The ancients didn't have the proper language to describe these things more concretely. So to rephrase, I think the guy is saying, "I believe that the negative hyperdimensional aliens are the most immediate and intimate threat to humanity." Yup, that and human ignorance.

But he's basically saying that, okay, so what many of the primitive people called "gods" were in fact aliens, but that this doesn't mean there is no "god" or "divinity". The Gnostics believed that the god of the Old Testament was a psychopathic deceiver who runs the matrix, that real divinity was beyond both Jehovah and this material world, which could be accessed through inner communion rather than through the intermediaries of organized religion.

That's what irks me about Sitchin, Gardner, Raelians, etc... that it plays right into the alien agenda to present themselves as the creators and thus rightful "owners" of mankind. Baloney. They manufactured the vehicle but do not own the driver.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

montalk wrote:

That's what irks me about Sitchin, Gardner, Raelians, etc... that it plays right into the alien agenda to present themselves as the creators and thus rightful "owners" of mankind. Baloney. They manufactured the vehicle but do not own the driver.

I'd even go a step further and question whether they did in fact manufacture the vehicle.  Even if we accept the proposition that ETs created modern humans by genetic engineering of lower lifeforms, they did not actually CREATE life in the first place; that was still presumably done by the prime Creator.  Therefore, in my way of thinking, any "intellectual property" rights that might exist with respect to the human vehicle would still belong to that Creator.   I don't think that just because you upgrade the RAM in your PC that gives you the right to say that now you ARE Dell -- no, you just took a Dell PC and modified it a bit ... no big deal really. 

I think the more important question here is where do we get our conception of "rights" from, anyway?  Can each of us, if necessary, articulate good reasons why we should not in fact be enslaved?    The whole philosophy of freedom   and where it comes from is not something that most people concern themselves with nowadays.

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

Master Montalk! Your sites RuleZ !!
So good that raises our energy by looking(reading) your conclusions !!!
I am very grateful for your effort in put all that stuff together!!!!
As always what you say really makes sense!!!!!
You are the Man !!!!!!
BTW, I prefer the phrase “He falls to the tricksters trick and want to trick the others." lol

I read a lot of the books from Sitchin, now I know MUCH better but still
enjoy the Sumerian stuff like the Gilgamesh story.

Morningsun76
They castrate us, and changed the name to “build" …
We are slaves, long time indeed; I am tired of this slavery, manipulation and lies.
Dell PC is good, but I prefer a “Frankenstein PC"  by “Doctor"  Pictus wink

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

8 (edited by montalk 2006-02-23 19:31:43)

Re: Hell-Of-A NutShell

AB wrote:

Huh? What do you mean? Like, they had no English? Is English somehow more evolved?

They had no English in ancient times, that is correct. And English is more descriptive than certain ancient languages because its vocabulary includes scientific and technological terms of which the ancients did not know.

However if you go back far enough, prior to what is normally considered "ancient" and thus prior to the Great Flood, language then becomes highly advanced again because Atlantis and other civilizations were incredibly advanced. In between then and now, language has suffered degradation. I think the term "Archon" was coined during the period of degradation.

Egyptian civilization and language appeared on the spot in its most advanced form and then deteriorated over the centuries. Sanskrit barely degraded at all, but good luck understanding the true context of its terminology. One day the term "automobile" may be translated not to mean "four wheeled vehicle propelled by an internal combustion engine" but rather "self-moving thing". The vedic texts about the Vimanas have been translated in the latter style because translators are working backwards from the modern remnants of Sanskrit.

Likewise does the Bible describe "flaming chariots" and "pillars of fire" because that is the best these recent ancients could do given the limits of their vocabulary and understanding. We may say instead "interdimensional scout ships"  and while it may not be the most accurate or advanced term, I think it is more advanced than "flaming chariot."

But you know all this already.

---

Pictus, thanks for the accolades, but remember to keep seeking better and better sources.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.