The Cassiopaean Cult? (Page 2 of 4)

Thanks.....don't mean to bite either.     Like I said, if I sound snippy, sorry, it's just I have a tendancy to get a little edgy if I know something is a certain way and it's being challenged or looked at skeptically.   It's more frustration than anything else I guess.   But anyway, no biting!     You're one of my new favorite posters too!

Does Laura look at the board while the session is in progress?  Because I really don't think it is that hard to spell things quickly.  Has she ever done it blindfolded?

"I'm not sure whether you're referring to the Cassiopaean Transcripts, or the articles published at Cassiopaea.org.  Okay, so some of the articles there are lengthy and dense which can cause for headaches, but physiological reactions aren't really criteria to judge material on. Better criteria would be: usefulness, accuracy, intuitive confirmation, clarity, and correlation with personal experience. Of course, that takes both comprehension of the material and dissection, for which some people don't have time/willpower/energy. For those people, they're entitled to their opinion but I wouldn't take their opinion too seriously."

The articles and the transcripts both sound like somebody just making up interesting answers to me.  I do not find them useful in my further understanding of the truth of the world.  They drone on and on about what Laura finds interesting half the time, and that is fine, but she is one the claiming that she is in contact with 6th density aliens.  Will power to read them?  Well I don't have much will power,  but that is not the reason I don't read them.  I read at least 5 or 6, and I find them to be rubbish, I guess it just seems so intuitively obvious to me that they are a distraction- a very long, time consuming distraction.

To each his own.

I've never been involved with the Cassiopaean group. I was aware of their website, but I'd always heard warnings to stay away from channeling and Oujia boards. It was only recently--through Montalk.net--that I decided to take an unprejudiced look at what they were saying. The information about Organic Portals has hit me like a ton of bricks. I think and feel that it is correct. Accepting this information has not caused me to become curious about the personalities of the channelers, to want to seek out and join the group, to want to send them money, or to start using a Oujia board for the purposes of contacting the Cassiopaeans myself. It has caused me to want to study Mouravieff's Gnosis books, and to get back onto the spiritual path I was on years ago before I became discouraged. Like everything, you have to use your own discernment. Gurdjieff said the following:

There may be inadequacies in the information coming from the Cassiopaeans, but overall it corresponds to my current level and is therefore useful to me. Your mileage may vary.

But they would, by definition, be non-human.

Right......and......?    The word "alien", while oftentimes referring to something foreign, usually, within the context of channelled material refers to beings from another planet.   Which is what I'm inferring by AZ1's use of "alien", and which is what I'm correcting, because they're not beings from another planet.   They're not even physical, according to them.  They're *supposed* to be us, in the future;  now, whether that's true, I don't know, and I can't argue it, but they have definitely NEVER claimed to be aliens.   This is a common misperception  by many people who haven't taken the time to actually really read the material and who just skim it then spout opinions.   They see the word "cassiopaea" and assume, Oh, they're beings from the Cassiopaea region of outer space.    X!

And nothing. I was done :-)