Re: Is it True?
czyx, interesting analysis. However, I must strongly disagree with you about the Trobrianders. You would do well, if you are so inclined, to read Bronislaw Malinowski's Argonauts of the Pacific, the ethnography he conducted with those people.
That's fair. My research on the Trobrianders was pretty hasty, and the focus of my analysis was overly narrow. I've added that book to my "to read" list.
So what if they don't have ritual for everything they build/do? They would be doing rituals 24/7. And if that's a sign to cutback technologically, then we better not have more than a few Oldowan stone tools and sticks.
I just had an interesting thought regarding the rituals. What if music were made a part of a technology building ritual, and each step (of extraction, preparation, assembly, etc.) was assigned its own note or interval? You could then have some pretty complex technologies accompanied by equally complex singing rituals, but the rituals wouldn't take up too much time. Each piece of technology would have its own ritual song, and each song could have many notes. With proper occult knowledge of the notes and their meanings, bad technology could be rejected because it would produce ugly, un-singable, or overly long songs. You'd have the song of the knife, the song of the clay bowl, etc. This might be one way to maintain intimate knowledge of the composition of your technology while expressing thankfulness and limiting growth. Song forms might even protect technology through difficult times, such those brought by missionaries and conquistadors who might ban or destroy external manifestations of certain technologies. Have you ever heard of such a thing? I know songs accompany work in many cultures, but I don't know if they've ever been found to act as precise instruction sets for the internal occult aspect of a culture's technology.
Please read my post on the Anthropik form under The Collapse, me and raku (and others) had a nice debate/discussion. My thoughts on technology are somewhat elaborated there.
Will do. ![]()