16 Reply by BlackBox

  • BlackBox
  • Guest

Re: movies

I remember the Cassiopaean channel mentioning that the consortium is about half oriented toward outward-service and half oriented toward self-service. This would mean that about half the consortium has at least semi-good intentions for the human population. Supposing this is true, then perhaps they actually intend to send out subconscious messages with these films, either as warnings or as wake-up calls, depending on a soul's particular mission for its incarnation. OR the film producers and script writers may have been inspired by higher-density service-to-others entities (as has been noted by the Cs to be the case on occasion) to make these movies and the consortium is simply allowing it.

In regards to movies such like "The Matrix", inspiration may be permitted by the consortium, however movies like "Independence Day" are certainly not from that same group, nor with the same intentions.

Some movies are designed to do the opposite of others. Balancing in Hollywood! smile

In regards to consortium hands being put on the movie-industry, it's not to the flattery-degree we give them. There are many many many people involved in the webs of consortium agenda and movie-mania. Not to sound anti-semitic, but the movie-industry is the high-road the Jewish populace has paved and it has many complicated roots.

Movies nowadays are exactly what sells to the interested mass. CGI, boobs, Bruce Willis and encodement. The encodement can usually be labeled in point-form. tongue I wrote an essay on Independence Day once...that was "fun". errr.

Consortium relations with the movie-industry is very indirect. The entertainment industry perhaps higher in concentration, but that is natural for a governing force. Especially a hidden, elaborate one.

  • From: US.VA
  • Registered: 2004-03-27

Re: movies

BTW, The Matrix Revolutions is out on video.  I'd like to explore some of it's contents, but maybe for another topic...

MU'06
  • From: US.VA
  • Registered: 2004-03-27

Re: movies

BTW > The Day after Tomorrow comes out... the day after tomorrow.  Just watched a short making-of and saw the actors to be quite sincere in suggesting the movie is designed as an environmental wake-up call in addition to being entertainment.

MU'06
  • From: US.VA
  • Registered: 2004-03-27

Re: movies

The Guy or wrote the Pentagon paper on Global Weather Change wrote:

Doug Randall: Sure, and let me also give you the background on this. The Pentagon asked us to think about abrupt climate change and what its geopolitical implications might be. We weren't saying this is what will happen, only that it plausibly could happen.

Abrupt climate change is the possibility of sudden and dramatic cooling, drying and windiness that potentially could be triggered by slow and gradual global warming. Now when you talk about climate change, most people think slow and gradual global warming, which itself is a very real problem. But the story that hasn't been told as often, but is clearly understood by most scientists, is a sudden and abrupt change in the planet's climate.

This has happened many times in the planet's history, and most scientists agree it will happen again at some point and that gradual warming makes it more likely to some degree. The big questions are when, how much, in what regions and to what degree.

Now, we looked at the worst-case realistic scenario: what would happen if abrupt climate change was as extreme as is plausible, if it hit the most vulnerable regions the hardest, and if it all happened at once. There are no scientists we've run into who say that abrupt climate change will unfold exactly as we've outlined, but there are also very few scientists who say that something like this is implausible.

What would happen? Well, in our study, average temperatures drop five degrees Fahrenheit, maybe twice as much in North America and Europe. There are huge droughts across the world and rapidly-worsening storms, leading to food shortages, lack of fresh water and disrupted energy supplies.

In terms of daily life, food prices would go up, and certain foods would be harder to get. Fuel prices would go up. But more importantly, if this were to occur, you'd probably see mass-migrations. People in Sweden moving to Spain, people in Canada moving to the US, people in hard-hit developing countries moving wherever they can.

But things might not be that bad, and we might be able to respond effectively.

(whole article)

Sure, Doug.  Keep dreaming.

MU'06
  • lyra
  • lyra
  • Naked Emperor Pointer Outer
  • Offline
  • From: my own private idaho
  • Registered: 2004-03-25

Re: movies

Hi Cameron,

I'm confused.............which part(s) don't you agree with ("Sure Doug.  Keep Dreaming.")

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

lyra's Website

21 Reply by cameron (edited by cameron 2004-05-28 03:10:54)

  • From: US.VA
  • Registered: 2004-03-27

Re: movies

Sorry.  That was confusing.  I was just referring to the last sentence of the quote. That we might be able to "respond affectively" to these earth changes. smile

MU'06
  • From: istanbul
  • Registered: 2004-05-13

Re: movies

I just checked movies directed by Roland Emmerich. The integrity is very interesting. Here are some;

1. King Tut (2005) (announced)
2. Day After Tomorrow, The (2004)
3. Patriot, The (2000)
4. Godzilla (1998)
5. Independence Day (1996)
6. Stargate (1994)
7. Universal Soldier (1992)
8. Moon 44 (1990)
9. Hollywood-Monster (1987) ... aka Ghost Chase (1988) (USA)
10. Joey (1985) ... aka Making Contact (1985)
11. Arche Noah Prinzip, Das (1984) ... aka Noah's Ark Principle, The (1984)


Now if I tell this to some of my friends around, the conversation would go through this probabilities;

a) Ah, pure coincidence. The man is not a good director, anyway and he chooses absurd subjects.

b) That's because money is in these subjects. He makes good money with these movies and goes on doing these.


But being in Noble Realms forum (and enjoying it) I would like to learn your opinions on probability of Emmerich taking info from 4D (STS or STO?). After reading C's material and still reading Bringers... , my whole look to movie industry has changed. For example I hated ID4 when I saw it first years ago but now I feel I have to watch it - carefully - again!

Ferit

Change we must, to live again
- Jon Anderson
  • From: US.VA
  • Registered: 2004-03-27

Re: movies

Thanks for posting this, Ferit.  This list is remarkable.  I share your opinion that Roland is likely to be a vehicle for some sort of Project Awakening involving movies.  As for the source of this agenda, I would probably say there are both STO and STS interests in this Project.  Apparently the Consortium on planet Earth is balance STO / STS and it may go to hold that there are certain projects disclosed which are allowed or accepted by both sides due to potential gain for both the STS and STO agendas.  Here is what the Cassiopaeans have said about the Consortium:

Session 01/21/95 wrote:

Q: Let me ask this one before the tape runs out and we take a break.  What is the “ultimate secret“? being protected by the Consortium?
A: You are not in control of yourselves, you are an experiment.

Then we have the Quorum and the Illuminati.  Not sure what the relationship between the Quorum/Illuminati and the Consortium is (according to the Cassiopaeans), but here's what they say about the relationship between the Quorum and the Illuminati:

10/16/94 wrote:

Q: What is the quorum?
A: Deeper knowledge organization.  Totally secret to your kind as of yet.  Very important with regard to your future.

So, perhaps the Quorum and/or Illuminati is a more likely source of Project Awakening.  Who knows.

MU'06

24 Reply by lyra (edited by lyra 2004-05-28 05:45:31)

  • lyra
  • lyra
  • Naked Emperor Pointer Outer
  • Offline
  • From: my own private idaho
  • Registered: 2004-03-25

Re: movies

Funny that Ferit mentioned feeling like he needed to re-watch ID4 again, carefully.   Because I just rented it two nights ago to re-watch before going to see "The Day After Tomorrow."  I hadn't seen ID4 in years, and had forgotten just how bad Roland Emerich's movies can be!!!   smile   The hallmark of a Roland Emerich movie is fantastic special effects, lots of "money shots", great story and concept.....................poor script!   Bad writing!   Cheesy dialogue!    Unbelievable situations that would never happen!    You have to laugh though.    If you go into his movies not taking it too seriously and not expecting it to be this serious, believable realistic movie, you'll be fine.   I mean, look at the dialogue in ID4.   It's beyond being bad writing and goes into the realm of campy, like it was done on purpose.  I think people get confused with his movies because the movies look absolutely fantastic and amazing..........but the dialogue and campiness and unbelievability of the situations / script contradicts that.   I mean, I walked out of Stargate when I saw it in the theater back in 1994!    Got up and left, totally pissed off, thinking "This is the stupidest movie I've ever seen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"   But I re-rented that one too a few months ago, knowing what to expect now.   That's all you have to do......know what to expect.   When I see "The Day After Tomorrow" I'm fully prepared for cheesy dialogue and unbelievable situations, mixed in with awesome special effects.    (On a sidenote, I just read something on the web talking about how Jake Gyllanhaal, star of TDAT, refused to say some of the lines in the movie and made them rewrite them because they was just that bad.   Apparantly, his mom is a screenwriter so he has no tolerance for bad dialogue.  wink   So we'll have Jake to thank for the movie being just that much less cheesy then it would have been.)   

And on a more serious note concerning the possible STO / STS Consortium having a hand in these movie..........I don't doubt it.   I think he's got a mix of both going on in his movies, good idealogy (you can rise up and fight back against forces that would want to oppress you and annhilate you, and you can win!!)  as well as disinformation.   Read "The Stargate Conspiracy" find out what the disinformation probably is.  wink

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

lyra's Website

  • From: sw tz rl nd
  • Registered: 2004-03-25

Re: movies

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0, … 30,00.html

ermolai's Website

26 Reply by BlackBox

  • BlackBox
  • Guest

Re: movies

cameron wrote:

So, perhaps the Quorum and/or Illuminati is a more likely source of Project Awakening.  Who knows.

From what I learned from the C-transcripts:

(If you already know this, my apologize)

Imagine 2 circles side by side, merging like a vendiagram. They blend in together.

Both circles symbolize the Free-Masons which are the top of the pyramid in humans hands of the MCS. The left part of the circle that blends with the right represent 'The Quorum' while the right circle that blends with the left represents 'The Illuminati'. The outer-edges of the left circle represent STO qualities, while the outer-edges of the right represent STS. As they blend together, they compose the TPTB.

When a revolutionary theory pops up in one Scientists head, it is not because he thought of it himself but rather that the Quorum projected/released that information. When they do this, it not only pops in one Scientists' head but for several, globally. The 100th Monkey Syndrome, except controlled.

Of course I'm not suggesting ALL innovations and inventions are projected and that those human Scientists shouldn't be credited...just some extending thoughts. I just think the Quorum regulates control via thought, information, and balances STO while the Illuminati enforces conformity, discipline and elusive control.

27 Reply by cameron (edited by cameron 2004-05-28 09:48:39)

  • From: US.VA
  • Registered: 2004-03-27

Re: movies

BlackBox wrote:

Both circles symbolize the Free-Masons which are the top of the pyramid in humans hands of the MCS. The left part of the circle that blends with the right represent 'The Quorum' while the right circle that blends with the left represents 'The Illuminati'. The outer-edges of the left circle represent STO qualities, while the outer-edges of the right represent STS. As they blend together, they compose the TPTB.

I see your attempted analogy.  But what the Cassiopaeans really said is not that both circles represent different aspects of the human element of the network, but that one represents the human aspect and the other the alien aspect.

C's from Session 11/12/94:

Q: Back to the quorum and illuminati.
A: Quorum mostly alien; illuminati mostly human.

MU'06

28 Reply by BlackBox

  • BlackBox
  • Guest

Re: movies

cameron wrote:

I see your attempted analogy.  But what the Cassiopaeans really said is not that both circles represent different aspects of the human element of the network, but that one represents the human aspect and the other the alien aspect.

The analogy isn't mine, it was the analogy given by the C's.

cameron wrote:

C's from Session 11/12/94:

Q: Back to the quorum and illuminati.
A: Quorum mostly alien; illuminati mostly human.

This makes sense and should be obvious because the Quorum's purpose is more on knowledge and higher-functions whereas the Illuminati's purpose is more of containing/enforcing the illusion of the experiment.

How do you best control a race? By hands-on organizations that can only be humans in majority. In the Quorum, on the other hand, they do not live outside of the shadows. That is to say, they are at the highest level of secrecy, so humans do not need to play as big of a role.

I dont think you're right about human/alien aspect. The pyramid is all that matters and "aliens" are at the top. The human aspect is controlled and organized by the 4D controllers. Where enforcement and direct-on-hands approaches are involved, humans are the pick of choice to be the majority. When it is indirect, humans do not need to be a large portion of the organization. It would be inefficient that way.

The Quorum deals with much larger macrocosm priorities while The Illuminati deals with the microcosm priorities. The former deals with earth-changes, knowledge-release, reinforcement of primary-events as to maintain time-locks, etc. The latter deals with society, enforcement of those who interfere with the time-locks like system-busters, light-members, etc. They run the governments, they run the media, they run the COINTELPRO, and most importantly keep all eyes oblivious to the Quorum.

I've discussed this topic at length at WRH and I think I have it down pretty well.

I'm following not assumptions but direct information given by the C's, cameron, and you can check read it over at http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave13a.htm

  • montalk
  • montalk
  • forum-keeper-upper
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2004-03-24

Re: movies

Interesting discussion, this is something I've tried to wrap my mind around as well, mainly the blended circle idea. Here's one key part of that session that stuck out:

Q: (L) Are you saying that some of the Quorum are good guys and bad guys and the same for the Illuminati because the two are on opposing sides of the circle but at the point of blending one is weighted more to one side and the other to the other side? And these organizations are where the interactions come together?
A: Closer.

So it appears to me that the Illuminati and Quorum each contain a duality, there being STS and STO elements in each with a fuzzy blending between these two dualities. The only thing that defines these organizations as whole would be their high level of knowledge and their relatively powerful place in the global scheme of things, the quorum being more powerful and having greater knowledge than the Illuminati. That makes sense if the Quorum is mostly alien, meaning they are of a 4D and thus more evolved nature.

As far as the blended circle goes, I think that by the time STS and STO evolve to that level of knowledge and power, they realize that each serves a valid place in the universe and in the evolution of mankind.

The grand cycle of human evolution requires cyclical motion between dark and light, imbalance and balance. This motion is what polarizes and motivates individuals and mankind at large to evolve. If everything were always balanced, there would be no drama. If everything were always imbalanced, there would be no light. Swinging between these two rotates the wheel, and moves the cart along.

So maybe the human experiment being run by the dual elements of the Quorum is something like a good cop / bad cop scenario. Both uphold and enforce their associated aspects of the divine law to encourage the polarization and evolution of 3D beings toward graduation into 4D of either polarity.

I'm reminded of the Harry Potter books, particularly the Hogwart's School of Wizardry. Potential wizards are recruited from the outside world, and then the students are divided up into four categories of learning depending on their inner natures. Two of the categories can be compared to higher density STS and STO paths of learning. The STS category is called Slytherin and characterized by being dark and ego-driven. And yet, the school as a whole allows their existence because it serves the learning of students who fit that category.

So I agree with Cameron's suggestion that "So, perhaps the Quorum and/or Illuminati is a more likely source of Project Awakening."

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

montalk's Website

  • Registered: 2004-04-10

Re: movies

Much food for thought, thank you all for your insights that help all of us on the forum to "wake up".  We all need an alarm clock at times.

I just had a feeling that maybe part of the Quorum's job/adgenda/purpose is to serve as that nudge to ensure the "wheel " doesn't stay stuck.  Spiritual atrophy is a choice, but there comes a time when an "all is not really right feeling" distracts us enough to MOVE. 

We can all assist (in our own beautiful/special/unique ways) to be the helpers with this natural process, hopefully more and more towards STO -is-ness.  All is not black and white, and sometimes the black being slung at you real hard, messy, and stinky REALLY forces one to take some sort of action.

If there is no time
      Then you have time for everything.
   You're never in a hurry.
That's true freedom.