16

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

I prefer an infinite number of limited intelligences. Keeps em from getting upitty. Isn't LUV grounded in illusion?

17

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

I like your last statement onionworld. I believe he is genuinely trying to help people wake themselves up and break dogmatism as opposed to erecting a different one. However, like we all seem to agree upon, the "bandwagon" effect definitely is real. I call it parroting. People believing without thinking and reitterating like a parrot (who doesn't understand the true meaning of what he's saying)  defeats the purpose of learning and knowledge because your no better off than you were before. You've just redecorated your prison cell. So some people may actually take for cash what Icke says, which is not what he would want, and that's their own fault. So in a sense, I guess you are right that Icke MAY be creating a herd-like following similar to cults, I don't know. But there is nothing he can do about it, it is just people missing the point of his teachings (like Jesus, except Icke is no Jesus:)). It happens.  That's all for me.

18 (edited by lyra 2005-09-29 08:23:29)

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

I came across David Icke in 2001, right after 9/11.  Or rather, I should say I was guided to David Icke, because the way it all fell into place was very unusual.    Like Karla Turner writes in "Into the Fringe", my "awakening" process transpired very rapidly within one month's time, with me "coincidentally" crossing paths with people and books and websites all at once, boom boom boom, in a matter of weeks, which kicked off the process.  David Icke was a part of that process.   I was getting ready for work one morning and had the radio station on to 95.5, KLOS, the classic rock station.  For years I'd listened to 106.7 KROQ faithfully, but I no longer could stand the music they were playing, ("new rock" - Incubus, Creed, Korn, etc. etc. gag)  But while I was getting ready for work, and with my ride to work due to arrive to pick me up within 10 minutes, I stopped what I was doing, walked over to the radio, and for NO apparant reason switched the dial to KROQ.

The Kevin and Bean morning show just so happened to be interviewing this very fast talking, hyper energy British dude who was talking about how 9/11 was planned by the U.S. government, and that something called the "Illuminati" was behind it.   I paused, listened, and became instantly riveted.  I actually sat down on the floor to listen to him and stopped getting ready for work, ride or no ride.   This was my first encounter with David Icke.   

After getting to work later on I made sure to check out his website which he made sure to plug plug plug.  When I got to it, I found all the same information that he discussed on the radio show, with one exception....

Reptillians.

There was an animated pic of Clinton with a forked tongue zipping in and out of his mouth.  I was like, "HANH??"

All this mention of reptillian shapeshifters!  What was this guy TALKING about!!   How insane!!!  People don't morph into reptiles!!  hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!  big_smile big_smile big_smile

But yet oddly enough, as much as I wanted to dismiss his work, I couldn't.  The rest of the site was so strangely on-target.  I agreed with the other stuff, just couldn't reconcile the reptillians thing.  So needless to say, I didn't dismiss him outright, and kept going back to his website everyday to read more.   I decided to just put the reptillians thing "on the back burner."  When in doubt, don't throw it out....just sit on it.  Put it on pause.   Time will ultimately reveal all things in the end if you just wait long enough. 

So all that led to me taking a trip to Barnes and Noble to buy a copy of "The Biggest Secret", which was a major contribution to my awakening process during that 4 week period.   And the rest is history!

All this, due to a compulsion to swtich the radio one morning to KROQ for no apparant reason, right as David Icke "coincidentally" happened to be on the air. 

Do I believe everything he says, 100%?   Of course not.  I don't think I believe 100% of ANYBODY else's viewpoints.   Hell, my own change every week!  smile   But I think he's right on about so many things, and he means well.  And like I've said a few times here on NR, what I like about him is that he evolves, as new information comes in.  He's not out there staticly promoting the same out-dated agenda year in and year out.    You watch him grow and evolve in his books, which is cool.    He's even recently slightly revised his stance on the reps, putting more emphasis on how they "shadow" people....versus completely morphing into them via shapeshifting.

As far as "Infinite Love is the only truth...."  I don't personally see what the problem is with that.   Sounds good to me.

What I do have issues with however are his website, namely the "Headlines" section, because considering Icke is supposed to be aware now of what's beyond the illusion, courtesy of his Ayahuasca trips, I don't understand why he maintains a website that goes in circles about negative news headlines.   I don't know, that's just me though.    There should be more emphasis on the new things he's discovered..........................................with solutions, and inspiring words for how to transcend things here in this reality.   Another thing I've come to realize is that in regards to the whole"Illuminati" deal, things are probably not necessarily as Icke thinks they are, or portrays them.  But he seems to be close enough, so, it's worth reading, and I don't believe that he's purposely trying to spread disinfo.    We can't all be right about everything.    So when it comes to people's works that may have some distortion, rely on your intuition and gut to tell you what the person's deal is, and analyze the "voice" they use in the rest of their writings to discern whether they mean well and are at least coming from a sincere - sane - place.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

19 (edited by LipstickMystic 2005-09-29 09:17:41)

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

Most people who feel that they have had a "peak experience" or time of spiritual illumination describe sensing the essential energy that pervades creation, and they perceive this as a vast, amazing, love force.

This is how everyone who has shared their own "enlightenment" experiences with me describes it. That's somewhere in the range of 1500 people at last count.  My own experience happened at the age of 16 and is pretty much indescribable. You'll accuse me of being a hippy chick smile  (Not that there's anything wrong with it!)

Does the concensus view of so many people mean that everyone will experience "enlightenment" in the same way?  Maybe not.  But there are an awful lot of folks who speak about receiving higher wisdom this way and seeing that, when the veil of this world is stripped away and you can see the Infinite, well, "infinite love IS the only answer."

But if infinite love is the only answer, maybe we'd better work out what the QUESTION is smile

All I know is that my experience changed me forever and turned on all of my circuits....psychic abilities, budding until that point, became full-blown.....I went around blissed out for a year with pure love and perceived NO duality in the world.......I went through what David Icke refers to as his "purple" stage because he rather infamously appeared on TV wearing purple and was made fun of. I think he was also saying he was Jesus at that point.  Jesus was at that level of consciousness, so Icke wasn't wrong smile

I think that when people raise their consciousness and successfully GLIMPSE that Creator/God/Great Spirit/Universal Energy/Big Puppy or whatever you call the divine essence, it's hard to describe what you sense, it's so multi-dimensional and experiential and vast.  But, the common words used by everyone I've talked to are.....

IT'S  ALL LOVE, MAN.  That is all it is, all we are, all that is.

Does this mean that everyone who has experienced deeply illuminating moments is in that altruistic loving state 100% of the time?  No.  I was there for a year.  Adulthood hit shortly thereafter, and boy, was that a crash landing!  There's not much room for a 100% love gushing chick out there in the real world.  Then I went through all my experiences with predator energy.  Predator energy envies the love state but can't directly enter into it, so it seeks "proxies" to feed off of. And so I moved on through a series of vampire boyfriends, business associates, and friends. And lots of lessons learned.

Some twenty years later, I've learned enough techniques to "pick off the ticks" and to remain relatively open, clear, and in good energy most of the time.  I consider that a great blessing.

It's very hard to reenter into the "real world" when you've gone 4-D or even 5-D for a period.  This place just doesn't make any sense when you come back. You don't even recognize your own species, really. You don't feel like one of them anymore. (And no, I didn't "come back" thinking I was an ET or renaming myself Aloha Starchild or any of that bunk.  I just felt very different from the average "Muggles" I saw roaming around, I couldn't identify with their drives, the things that motivated them.) I often wonder if autistic children are simply out in 4-D without a road map to come back "home" into 3-D.

This spiritual dislocation you go through after "illumination" can then be the burden that you carry for the rest of your life. You're always try to show people how they can access that other level of awareness, but mostly, they just think you're a loony and are more interested in making a buck and being miserable. Pretty boring, most of humanity is.

At this point in my life, I've learned to embraced my looniness.  It's the happiest, best way for me to be.  God forbid I ever "grow up" and enter into the stodgy, stale, rigid reality that most "adults" live in.

Here's to remaining a loony child, and to staying attuned to love as much as possible, without losing sight of the reptiles always nipping at your toes.

Jennifer

PS I was just writing about the enlightenment experience, David Icke, and more at my blog yesterday. You're welcome to have a peek: 

http://www.lipstickmystic.com/blog2.html

20

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

Hey, thene's another Jennifer here!  Although I spell my name with
one "n."  That's why I shortened it to Jen online, people were always
misspelling it...

Anyway, loved your post, and for one thing, agree with you that most people are pretty boring. That's why I'm a loner. 

Lewis Carroll, who wrote the Alice books, was also a loner.  I mention this because I'm going to add the Duchess' thoughts here, which I think are very much in sync with Icke's.  Alice and the Duchess are at the Queen's croquet game:

`The game's going on rather better now,' she said, by way of keeping up the conversation a little.

`'Tis so,' said the Duchess: `and the moral of that is--"Oh, 'tis love, 'tis love, that makes the world go round!"'

`Somebody said,' Alice whispered, `that it's done by everybody minding their own business!'

`Ah, well! It means much the same thing,' said the Duchess, digging her sharp little chin into Alice's shoulder as she added, `and the moral of that is--"Take care of the sense, and the sounds will take care of themselves."

smile

21

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

Hi Jennifer with one "n!"

I love Alice in Wonderland and Lewis Carroll's whole "outsider" thing. Okay, so he had a strange attachment to little girls. He still rocked as a writer!  Ever read his "Hunting of the Snark?" Absurdity at its best. "For the snark WAS a boojum, you see!"

I've always gone by "Jennifer," never been a Jen or a Jenny.  Jennies are cute, freckled, and short.  I'm tall, pale-faced, and well, cute on a good day, scary on a bad day!

Nice to "meet" you, J!

Jennifer aka LipstickMystic

22 (edited by Jen 2005-09-30 12:20:31)

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

LipstickMystic wrote:

Hi Jennifer with one "n!"

I love Alice in Wonderland and Lewis Carroll's whole "outsider" thing. Okay, so he had a strange attachment to little girls. He still rocked as a writer!

It's true he loved the company of little girls,  and photographed them in the nude, but this has to be seen in the context of his times--the Victorian "cult of the child."  http://www.lookingforlewiscarroll.com/Cult.html#far


Ever read his "Hunting of the Snark?" Absurdity at its best. "For the snark WAS a boojum, you see!"

Certainly!  Yes, great nonsense.  His Alice books are my fave writings of his, though.

I've always gone by "Jennifer," never been a Jen or a Jenny.  Jennies are cute, freckled, and short.  I'm tall, pale-faced, and well, cute on a good day, scary on a bad day!

I've never been a Jenny either, and never even had a nickname until
recently.  Am I cute?  That's in the eye of the beholder (or holder as the case may be). wink

Too bad NR doesn't a have a pics posting area, would love to see y'all.

Nice to "meet" you, J!

Jennifer aka LipstickMystic

Ditto. Have a great day full of Infinite Love!

Jen aka Cosmic Force

(In Chinese, "jen" actually does mean "cosmic force"!)

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

I have just been reading and listening to new Ickestuff  for the first time in many years...

there is an obvious contradiction with him in that he doesn't seem to see that his world view is also just an illusion, His Illusion- he needs to see that there is something  IN CONTROL and "negative"- in an interview he gave a formulation (which belies this view however) which is not new and that i agree with which is basically this-

we live in a universe of energy; there are laws (like physics etc) which govern it:

there is a system of reciprocal maintenance, feeding, energy exchange;

we humans are energy upgraders and exchangers and as we live under cosmic laws this is our lot full stop- to feed something  system;

our world is a 'prison' because as we are, unaware and hypnotised and blind to the real processes going on, we only do our energy exchange stuff unconsciously/automatically and therefore we are not in control of ourselves or our "destiny" (for example the energy required by a particular "cosmic process" requires a large amount of energy so the laws start to "play" and somewhere down here people start killing eachother, or maybe there's an earthquake or something)....

So it's all mechanical and unconscious including those who "rule" us- it's not personal and it's not organised.

The way out for the individual is to find a way of supplying the requisite energy needed by the "matrix" whilst keeping enough of the stuff for your own evolution/ development/ awakening/ and escape- which is to become more conscious.

It is thought that a long long long time ago, somehow, earthlings had a better idea of all this and provided the energy consciously and voluntarily- and thus there was a balance.


Love is an "energy", a state of being, a level of consciousness- all our loves (romantic, filial etc) are just pale imitations, the merest "astral wiff' of the Real thing....sometimes through "peak experiences" and so on we can be touched by this "energy" (through grace?) and then we know, Yep!  it IS all about LOVE man!

And then after the experience we are back down here...knowing about Love but unable to generate it...knowing that this Love could change everything....

i think the only thing we can do is to keep plugging away, step by step at trying to volunatrily "donate" the energy to the "matrix" and not leaking any that is left over- bit by bit we increase our own personal stash, for our own use (which is to grow in being which leads to Love)

lala

"The Earth is in exchange with higher levels of existence. For this an apparatus is
needed. Mankind is that apparatus. This exchange is not automatic; it requires work."

24 (edited by Risen 2005-09-30 22:09:58)

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

I've read (and own) several of Icke's books.  I think it's pretty obvious there are definitely some contradictions in what he says.  I've often wondered whether he's truly a "truth seeker", or a disinformation agent, a mole, etc.  However whichever of the above may be true, I think it's safe to say there are a lot of truths in his materials.

I remember when I first discovered him in around 1999, I was convinced he was completely nuts and disregarded everything he said after reading the reptilian references.  However 2 years later it hit me like a brick wall that there was a lot of truth to him, and I began to see that it was completely possible there might be truth to the reptilian theory.

Whether he's completely right or completely wrong, or whatever shade of gray between, he has definitely opened my mind to more possibilities than I had considered before reading his materials.

This is no time for the righteous
Only the wicked survive
Bake up a batch of the Yellow Cake
Bake up a batch of the lies
- - - - -[ Yellow Cake - Ministry - Rio Grande Blood (2006)

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

Hey Onionworld and all the others. Am new to this and maybe have a different perspective on things as I have done Ayahuasca. I understand what David tries to get across but unfortunately words cannot do it justice for it is a feeling that I never had experienced until I came into contact with Ayahuasca. Infinite love is a feeling he tries to put into words, a feeling you have never had. That is how I experienced it and it was total happiness. No need for any societal BS, no need for identity, no need for a label, no need for a past nor a future. Just "being", without anywhere to go or stuff to do. it has nothing to do with religion either, cause in my view religion equals control etc.

Re: Contradiction in David Icke's teaching?

Nowhereman wrote:

Hey Onionworld and all the others. Am new to this and maybe have a different perspective on things as I have done Ayahuasca. I understand what David tries to get across but unfortunately words cannot do it justice for it is a feeling that I never had experienced until I came into contact with Ayahuasca. Infinite love is a feeling he tries to put into words, a feeling you have never had. That is how I experienced it and it was total happiness. No need for any societal BS, no need for identity, no need for a label, no need for a past nor a future. Just "being", without anywhere to go or stuff to do. it has nothing to do with religion either, cause in my view religion equals control etc.

1. Don't need Ayahuasca to get there.....
2. it gives a taste of possibilites, but nothing permanent
3. you have *no idea* what others have experienced

"The Earth is in exchange with higher levels of existence. For this an apparatus is
needed. Mankind is that apparatus. This exchange is not automatic; it requires work."