I read somewhere that the great pyramid of Giza is not just a pyramid but is in reality a mirror of itself below ground as well (as above so below). This of course would make it a cube instead of a pyramid.

Actually, the Great Pyramid mirrored would be an octahedron (8 sided), not a cube (6 sided).

OMG you have to tell me what is the black cube of saturn!! Google produced only TWO results!!!

Hi Xeno, I don't think the phrase "black cube of saturn" was just put on that one picture to make the point; it isn't a term in common usage.  If you want to do some more hunting around on this topic, I'd trying Googling for "saturn kaaba."  I just tried that and in even in the first page's search results excerpts it looks like there's a few interesting things.

StarCat wrote:

[...] Back to Cubes....hmmm the Dimensional Geometry as given by David Wilcock [...] The Black Cubic Space - Keys of Enoch???

See here for a few references on this.

OMG you have to tell me what is the black cube of saturn!! Google produced only TWO results!!! _with_ quotations!!! that means they are hiding something. 

My first guess would be that it does indeed tie in with this whole cubic nature of reality were talking about. See the hundreds of people surrounding it? They're feeding it massive ammounts of energy.

[...] Back to Cubes....hmmm the Dimensional Geometry as given by David Wilcock [...] The Black Cubic Space - Keys of Enoch???

See here for a few references on this.

The Cube is definitely a trapping geometry and definitely not one that creates harmony
Weird

Trapping . . . just like the effects of 'darkness' universe' being created to cause conflict and strife for those living in it. (proposed by Stanford at the www.xeeatwelve.com site) Funny you mention the word 'trapping' since it matches so much with this view of the universe I have contemplated lately and also with the view that this world could possibly be a 'spiritual prison-planet' in the sense that this conflict-oriented universe would help to trap incarnated souls into a life of addictions and fear-based paradigms.

And I would assert that the presentation of TimeCube by the guy at the www.timecube.com site could have possibly been manipulated to cause it be presented in a negative way (it is an obvious assumption to know that the concept itself will be recieved in a negative way given such a negative presentation).

Could this be a hint as to it's relation to a cubic nature of reality in this universe? Could this point towards it being the resting place of the Atu-waa time restarting machine?

Now there's a coincidence. That link posted by meta-agnostic just now ( http://www.someplacesomewhere.com/post. … FORUM_ID=2 ) links to http://freeyourbrain.tripod.com/ where there is information claimed to originate from a piece_of_nothing. Hunh. That person is a member of NR! Minus an underscore.

In all seriousness, does anyone have any method of judging/discerning whether or not the author of "Timecube" actually believes what he writes?

From what I hear anyone can contact him through email. I would suggest doing so and using your own discernment in deciding whether he believes it. I myself would lean towards him indeed believing it. Also I would suggest that the absence of any working link to the MIT lecture would add to the arguement for authenticity of timecube (the broken link is found at wikipedia and elsewhere).

http://www.someplacesomewhere.com/post. … FORUM_ID=2

Unfortunately it doesn't elaborate much, just that "supposedly" it is a parody.  I will take whywhywhy's word for it for now that the proof doesn't make any sense.  I have to leave work in a few minutes and I don't think I can handle melting my brain by trying to digest Timecube right now.

Someone on the message board suggested that they knew the author of Timecube had created the entire thing as a joke and wanted to see where it would go.  I wish I could find the link now.  It seems possible.  Anyone else think so?

meta-agnostic,

I agree with you.  The Axiomatic Proof has been written in a form that resembles a riddle almost to the point to make it difficult to follow up.

In the Axiomatic proof Cases 6-10 when the line is rotated and a plane is selected the selection is a square plane.  To me is more natural to select a plane that fits the area the line paints as it is rotated.......a circle.   His entire proof is based on the quadrants and intersecting lines on this square plane.  It just does not make any sense.  In nature it seems that circular shapes and motion are preferred over the square/rectangular counterparts.  The use of square shapes and motion have human design written all over it.   

Regards,

Lee

First, here is what is purported to be the proof of the timecube reality which is strangely absent from the www.timecube.com website. It is found at www.cubicao.tk which was made by an aparently Austrailian kid who seems to be an avid supporter of the timecube idea. This kid is aparently also the 'Cubic awarness online webmaster' known as 'Cubehead' at the graveyardofthegods forum which displays some devotion to the timecube idea. Coincidentally, I do believe Australia to be the same continent where Amitakh Stanford (of the www.xeeatwelve.com website) lives. If I am not mistaken, Stanford being a source of the cubic _sun_ idea. Could there be a connection between 'Cubehead' and Stanford?

Anyway, the cubicao.tk site links to this video download starring 'Cubehead' ranting and raving about timecube in a similar fashion to the presentation found at the timecube.com site.

Now. In troydungeon's thread at the davidickeforum (referenced earlier) we read troydungeon's reply to a forum poster who had confronted him with the timecube site in an apparent comparison with his cubic sun idea. There he claims "The cubic sun has nothing to do with the time cube." But, let us remember troydungeon's claim in this thread here at NR about the single and solitary reason why the Earth is special -

I also remember troydungeon stating (though I haven't yet found the link to this) that what would happen given that this 'time machine' is not 'restarted' would be that reality would crumble apart (resulting in the destruction of Earth and it's inhabitants.)

Which finally brings me to an identical claim by made by 'Cubehead' in the video linked above. At precicely 4:45 into the 12+ minute presentation we have the claim that, "Only through timecube can humanity be saved - without timecube it will all self destruct!"

Is troydungeon Cubehead? Regardless, there definitely seems to be some consistencies between timecube and what is referred to as the 'Atu-waa' (time machine buried in the Earth thousands of years ago). I would even also say that the cubic suns thing fits in there somewhere as well.