Topic: chasing the white rabbit

I don't know if this particular subject has been discussed; I followed Montauk's useful links on the subject but didn't find anything specifically about it. So...

Many moons ago I was a member of a group investigating UFOs. We would go to alleged landing sites, interview abductees and document physical evidence. We did get some very interesting information but, after a while, I noticed a repeating pattern. Whenever there was a "good" case someone would contact the founder of the group with really good information... which somehow was always incomplete or would never be useful. Based on this information we spent lots of time and effort going to places that didn't pan out or talking to people that weren't really part of the case.

I've noticed the same tactic being applied to the folks here. Great new revelations from "insiders" are discovered, or new channelled info with apparent relevence to important questions comes through... and somehow it's _not_quite_right_. I recently heard a broadcast where a supposed former government agent said that this technique is called "chasing the white rabbit"; giving the investigator enough correct information to make him believe he's on the right track, then deliberately including false info so both he and the real sources are misled and eventually discredited.

I strongly urge all NRers to _carefully_ consider the information from "disclosures" and channelled sources against what they understand of spiritual knowledge, correct action and personal and social development and to, if possible, realistically test their conclusions with the understanding that they may be mistaken or deliberately misled. I also know that as explorers we have to take risks; I am personally going to keep doing so but with a hefty dose of paranoia included.

We're all butterflies flapping our wings and changing the world.

2 (edited by montalk 2006-12-11 21:42:57)

Re: chasing the white rabbit

Good advice, starling. Sounds like a combination of "red herring" and "wild goose chase." Some of these disinformation packages take the form of virally provocative "news releases" that make it onto fringe radio shows like Rense or Coast-to-Coast due to their sensationalistic nature. Whether the person has been deceived into disseminating what he/she believes is true, or whether the person is knowingly deceiving or hoaxing, either way it serves a psyops agenda.

In pondering some possible common traits among these, here is what comes to mind:

* contains just a few pieces of carefully selected truths, just a few items of evidence. But these are too convenient and few, like evidence planted by someone with limited resources. Hoaxers do this a lot, like the case of Stan Romanek. Another example: "The Templars and the Ark of the Covenant".

* is removed from the greater context of research data. Like if it's some alarmist piece concerning imminent meteor impact, it simply doesn't mesh with the indicator data originating from outside what the source itself could select and control.

* like the joke, there is much in it that is true, and much that is new, but everything true about it is old, and everything new about it is false.

* it has a fictionalized feel to it. You know how in movies everything is nice and tidy, packaged and easy to swallow with a linear point to it all. Well reality is more about subtle nuances, peripheral clues, indirect evidence, hazy conclusions. If something is too slickly packaged then it probably isn't true. Example: Project Serpo.

* leads people on with tantalizing promises that never materialize. Example: NESARA, Leo Wanta.

* the ones disseminating and going nuts for it aren't exactly shining examples of mature and discerning minds.

* other sources it correlates with also share these traits. A whole pack of disinformants can support and cite each other to build artificial credibility through the illusion of independent corroboration.

Just some suggestions there. I can feel when something is off, then take the magnifying glass to find out exactly why. I use the context of everything else put together to evaluate whether something new fits or not. If someone gives a prophecy of impending doom but no other indicators (including my dreams and other precursors) suggest it then I correctly conclude they are full of baloney.   

If one has not done enough research to build up a solid and broad base of context, if intuition is not well developed, if analytical thinking skills are sloppy, if ego insecurities make one prone to being romanced by wishful thoughts, if interest in fringe material is simply for entertainment value rather than a deep desire for truth, then it's very very easy to get fooled. Think about it... these disinformation pieces are at best designed by military intelligence with decades of knowledge into human psychology. They could even be engineered by alien intelligences with hyper-dimensional perceptive and calculative abilities. But the one thing these deceivers cannot overcome in their targets is independent reasoning combined with intuition honed through experience. For anyone with an eye for truth, lies become increasingly easy to spot.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

Re: chasing the white rabbit

here's an example, that may not be an example, but the antithesis of it.  last nite the mate had on the history channel, and there was a pictoral rendering of wallis budge's search for the papyrus of ani, (its really anu--annanuki)  with the correlation from the book of the dead.  they told the 19th century story of its archealogical discovery, like they usually do, with actors, showing how he had found it, and was trying to get it out of egypt.  then, within that, they had a really really cool, intertwined story of a boy named ani, who had died and was trying to cross over, thru the river of dead, into the afterworld.  using the greatest sets, and FX effects, they showed ani, getting his heart weighed, on the scales of truth, and how that half-lion, alligator, cheetah, monster creature was there to eat his soul, if indeed, he didnt make it thru the levels. and the weighing of the heart with the feather, the feather being "truth" as he was escorted by anubis, who spoke in ancient egyptian, (sounded just like north american indian dialects and dont know if they had made that up or not) along with maat. who assisted with the weighing.

now im goin nuts on this as im in the other room on NR of course, reading and pondering, and i hear all this, and i gotta go in and see more.  i go in to see that a PhD narrating in the background, says that the papyrus was designed to actually look like a modern day video game, and that "the figures and drawings came/come to life for those on cross-over, and its entered into, as one would in a real-life video game.  i had never heard this before, and i said so to the mate, but it was intriguing.  i also told the mate how the levels in that "game" they were portraying, corresponded with the theocratic bands, monroe's levels, and the bardo, from tibetan and catholic systems, and i told him, its annanuki, so maybe all bull, and dangerous, and not to be trusted, nevertheless, there they were in that show.  it went on to of course, pass him thru, and he ends up at the gates of "heaven" escorted in, and they had a ton of monoliths all there, all these giant gods, staring him down, as he walks thru with anubis.  monuments to the theocrats?  big synchs.  and they had made him recite the "confessions"--recite the answers/prayers to the 13 confessions from the papyrus. 9 & 13, in sets.  they read them off, and guess what they were--sounded exactly like the 10 commandments.  so this one professor (they had about 4 of them from egyptologists to museum curators) starts talking about how they prob were the basis for the 10 commandments, and they go on to show moses holding up the tablets.  one says moses of course, was schooled there, in the palaces of the pharoahs, and they go on to say at least 100 yrs had taken place between the writings and his arrival on mt sinai with the 10.  they say there were originally 30.  see what i mean?  im havin a fit, as usual, and im wishing everybody on NR was watching, but u know, no tv's for some.  im going--oh my, here we go again, we have the influences of  sirius, gods, egypt, yahweh, death, the river, numbers, levels, trials, coincidences. and im cutting it short there for sake of typing.  so see that?  BITS AND PIECES.  its always bits and pieces.  who is to say?  what does one do or believe.  i get it all, its all intertwined.  u dig out what correlates, u did and dig and go aha, and the next minute, u go aw shucks.

the clincher is--no one comes back to tel it.  or even channels it as one way or THE OTHER.  thats the set-up.  u look at mankind even needing commandments in the first place, u look at ani--and u just know its annanuki, and then u go well, there that is, and then u go, connections, synchs, connections.  the lies were all there too, even from the mouths of the "experts"--who have been fooled.  religion--theres the biggest belief system of it all.  that was militarily and alien seeded--that i believe--all inserts on a planet, a planet of men.  supposedly an outpost way on the edge of this milky way galaxy.  is that even correct?  its on a trade-route they say, between sirius, arcturus, draco, orion.  the idea of military == alien, WIH?  its always WAR WAR WAR.  on this planet of MEN.  its a war up there, down here, everywhere, and u have to lie to get out?  thats hwat they portayed while budge was tricing everybody in authority with sedating spiked booze and food so he could put the guards of the papyrus to sleep, and take the goods to england, where he cut up the papyrus in the next 5 yrs, and put it on display in london.  and having poor little ani, thinkin his soul would be eaten if he didnt talk to himself, telling his "heart" to lie to the weighers.  he actually said in this--"oh heart, do not betray me now at my time of need."

omg, what to do?  who to believe?  whats the truth?  were the 10 commandments (puke) really seeded from the papyrus of ani?  anu?  i wanna see em, meet them, ask them shit/stuff.  and there have been at least 16 crucified "saviors" too from mithras to JC.  WTH?  to me, its all stories, but yet i love the cross referencing, and the mysticism.  why does it have to be this way?  cause nobody would agree to come here and go thru any of it, i guess, if one KNEW, but we came anyway, with no manual, no real book, and there are many books.  many "ways"  would we come here and go thru life?  unless...unless UNLESS....what?  see that?  ah, the mysteries.  keeps one very busy.  has me all wrapped up.   for the EXPERIENCE is all i can truly come up with.  to have the experience, in a body, that thinks, feels, bleeds, worries, wonders.  i see what u mean starling. i agree with what u say montalk.  apparently, one writes THEIR own book here, and all the stuff can be in the reference section.

GNOTHI SEAUTON "Know Thyself!"

Re: chasing the white rabbit

I know what you mean.  A bit like a rubic's cube, only crunchy.  cool

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. Jimi Hendrix