Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Lyra, thanks for the clarification.  Point taken.

However, the point of my post was not to derail the thread but that I agree with your thought that it has already happened.

The Love was written in the sky!!!!!!   Certainly looked good to me.

Perhaps 2012 is a deadline, perhaps not.  Something has certainly happened to me, and I see it happening increasingly among some of those closest to me.  The world certainly seems softer to my eyes, and my heart is full and open and showing me the way. 

Glad to hear you like to dance Lyra wink

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. Jimi Hendrix 

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Sure Zagami has a disorderly mind... I have listened to his radio interviews with Greg Sczymanski and he's so talkative and disorderly that he can be very annoying.

montalk wrote:

What if 2000-2030 is the key window during which our choices and allegiances matter most in determining the outcome? Then if 2012 is pushed as the final "it's all over folks, let's go home" date, it would be very easy to create a self-fulfilling prophecy. Like setting up a fake finish line 3/4 way into a marathon so that the targeted runners stop running just when they need to pick up the pace.

You got it in the Bull's eye, Montalk!

Our choices and allegiances matter most in determining what will come next, in the future and also in our future incarnations. Two 'races' are being born: the beast race is dividing itself from the spiritual race. Thus we will have increasingly two types of people, and only a slight spiritual minority will be truly STO. Many people, even many who still can be 'saved', will incarnate in the materialistic-animalistic (STS) race.  The Michaelic-STO race will be persecuted and great suffering is awaiting them. How we live now, how we respond to life and others, determines which one of these two paths our soul-spirit will take in the future. This is a most crucial moral turning point for the soul-spirit of mankind: STS or STO? You cannot postpone the necessity of choosing between these two options right now. The number 666 indicates a time when it is too late to turn back and change sides. 6 (imperfection, incompleteness, division, 6=3+3, 33) is the last figure before 7 (completion of a cycle). We are living a 666 period now. There will be many other 666's in the spiritual realms in a distant future.

Promises of 'heaven on earth' and 'quantum transmutation of consciousness' in 2012 is a gigantic trap.

Like channeled entities saying that 'God is in you' and that you just have to 'loose the illusion of limitation' to become a god. It means actually: 'become an angel right now and forget all the improvement you can make on yourself, flee right now and leave away all the base things that keep you tied to the illusion of reality'. This way you will think you are already fit for becoming an angel and thus will become a premature and immature angel... Many spiritualities suggest that. This is luciferic trap, to use Steiner's concepts of luciferic and ahrimanic traps. This is a tempation fit for spiritually-minded people... mostly, it is lovers of ease who fall into this trap.

33 (edited by proto 2007-01-24 18:47:42)

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Nice write up Montalk and Druid!

I also wanted to add to this 2012 thing and tie with what we know about in the past. What's interesting is back in the year 999, people during those days actually thought the world was coming to an end, an armeggedon. Um, nothing happened except your typical savage war "that's my land, arrgghh!".

Now, fast foward to our time. Alot of people are suspecting that 2012 is the end of some sort. I actually fell for it but deep down, the word "laziness" was running through my body. I feel like this whole 2012 thing may be a joke, just like 999. The general population knows not to take the Catholic Church seriously, but they do take these Mayan prophecies seriously. Not that I'm discrediting them, since I find some truth to their wisdom, but at the same time, I feel like it's the same situation, but *updated*, 2012 style.

Who knows, it may happen, it may not happen. I just would feel really guilty slouching around, expecting some date to radically change and define me, all for no cost. Just not my thing. I'm weird, I guess I like working for what I want. And if I'm wrong, then I guess it's my problem big_smile.

"We either make ourselves miserable, or we make ourselves strong. The amount of work is the same."
– Carlos Castaneda

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Hi Proto,

Why would it necessarily need to have the effect of

slouching around, expecting some date to radically change and define me, all for no cost.

To me it its just another idea that is 'out there', with all those other ideas including the catholic church, mayans, aliens, left wings, right wings, and dietary advice.  I take what I like and I leave the rest.

I believe nothing now, I watch the moment.

I'm finding for myself that whatever is going on for me is down to where my awareness is at.  If it is here and now, then I can tell you that I'm living a big, beautiful adventure.  But, if it is 2012, or 1998, or 1966, or 1989, or 2008, or 1715, or if it is tomorrow or yesterday, then you can bet that I am probably living a nightmare to one degree or another.

Just Say No to Time.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. Jimi Hendrix 

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Sorry, quick diversion.  Just felt like adding my opinion on beaming love.  The thing I see about it is that they didn't ask for it.  Which for me, seems like an attempt at free-will imposition.  I don't know that's just how it appears to me.  Now back to your regularly scheduled armageddon.

36 (edited by proto 2007-01-25 17:14:26)

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

free*world wrote:

Why would it necessarily need to have the effect of

slouching around, expecting some date to radically change and define me, all for no cost.

To me it its just another idea that is 'out there', with all those other ideas including the catholic church, mayans, aliens, left wings, right wings, and dietary advice.  I take what I like and I leave the rest.

I'm sorry, I should've made myself alot clearer. Yeah, I agree, the idea is out there like alot of other ideas/theories, however, I've noticed people outside NR who believe in this shift hardcore and I observe their behavior, speech, etc and they seriously think they're going to be saved by some date. These are the same people who look down on Christians and how they believe Jesus is actually going to come in physical form and save people. Not so much. Both groups are playing the same game, but in different guises and expect to have something or someone to do their "dirty work" like working on yourself/helping others in terms of mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, but that's doubtful. I actually overheard some guy in  Barnes and Noble who said "after 12/21/2012, life's going to be so different!!!"to his friend. I was about to say something, but I didn't. Why can't you change your life now and make it different? I know I go through major changes WEEKLY for the better by bettering myself in someway, shape or form, not that I'm special or expect an Olympic gold medal, but it can be done today if you choose.

That's what I meant when I said "slouching around", like the guy in Barnes and Noble and his weirdo voice all giddy, giving the impression that he's advanced and arrogant with his know it all demeanor. (Ok, I seriously did not like this dude, he rubbed me the wrong way haha, but great writing inspiration with this whole 2012 thing).

"We either make ourselves miserable, or we make ourselves strong. The amount of work is the same."
– Carlos Castaneda

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

montalk wrote:

First of all, the Illuminati (even ex-Illuminati) don't type in all caps, haha.

The article druid posted was interesting, but based on what Zagami writes, how he writes it, how and through whom he came on the 'scene', I highly doubt he ever was part of the Illuminati.

"Illuminati" means "illuminated ones," right? They tend to be highly intelligent with an extremely refined persona and eloquent manner  of speech. In contrast, Zagami's writings show many characteristics of an emotionally unbalanced hoaxer or self-deluded conspiracy buff giving the fringe community the usual run around. Not too uncommon these days.

And all the "good" information Zagami discloses can already be found in other conspiracy literature, as though he incoherently slaps together what he has read using all the key buzzwords with some clumsily added flourishes. Come on... it's obvious, as discussed previously on NR:

Apparently he is now posting on the David Icke forum under the name of lyra.
http://www.davidickeforum.com/forum/vie … start=1410

Its not like we are fractions of the whole but rather versions of the whole.

38 (edited by lyra 2007-01-26 12:17:15)

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Barefoot Doc wrote:

Apparently he is now posting on the David Icke forum under the name of lyra.
http://www.davidickeforum.com/forum/vie … start=1410

Oh jesus god.  For real??   I'm afraid to even click on the link and see. 

ugh.


Edit:   Okay, I clicked over to see.  Luckily he does identify himself as Leo Zygamy, or whatever his name is.  He just so happened to choose the same handle as me.  Hopefully people won't get confused, because there are people on the Icke forum who post here.  The only problem would be if they don't see his first post where he identifies himself as the Zygamy dude, and then think it's me, now posting over on David Icke.  I did register to the Icke forum a long time ago...but NOT as "lyra," and only made a few posts.  Namely, I questioned the people who were posting attacks towards Neomatrix's "Open Letter to David Icke," just being dumbasses, and I also set the record straight when former NR poster and short term resident nutter "Racsouran" started posting lies about what happened during his brief time spent here at NR.  I don't think he realized that anybody from NR was over there reading his stuff and would step up and go, Um, excuse me, Hello, that's not what happened, AT all.    wink  So yeah, that was my brief foray into the Icke forum.  Found it to be too chaotic and noisy for my liking.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

lyra wrote:
Barefoot Doc wrote:

Apparently he is now posting on the David Icke forum under the name of lyra.
http://www.davidickeforum.com/forum/vie … start=1410

Oh jesus god.  For real??   I'm afraid to even click on the link and see. 

ugh.


Edit:   Okay, I clicked over to see.  Luckily he does identify himself as Leo Zygamy, or whatever his name is.  He just so happened to choose the same handle as me.  Hopefully people won't get confused, because there are people on the Icke forum who post here.  The only problem would be if they don't see his first post where he identifies himself as the Zygamy dude, and then think it's me, now posting over on David Icke.  I did register to the Icke forum a long time ago...but NOT as "lyra," and only made a few posts.  Namely, I questioned the people who were posting attacks towards Neomatrix's "Open Letter to David Icke," just being dumbasses, and I also set the record straight when forum NR poster/short term resident nutter "Racsouran" started posting lies about what happened during his brief time spent here at NR.  I don't think he realized that anybody from NR was over there reading his stuff and would step up and go, Um, excuse me, Hello, that's not what happened, AT all.    wink  So yeah, that was my brief foray into the Icke forum.  Found it to be too chaotic and noisy for my liking.

Oh well lyra anyone who knows you would not mistake the 2 from reading his posts and yours, for a start you make engaging interesting and non dogmatic posts and for those who do not know you who cares smile

Its not like we are fractions of the whole but rather versions of the whole.

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Barefoot Doc wrote:

Oh well lyra anyone who knows you would not mistake the 2 from reading his posts and yours, for a start you make engaging interesting and non dogmatic posts and for those who do not know you who cares smile

Not to mention that Lyra doesn't post entire BOOKS spanning multiple posts, and expect anyone in their right minds to read it all. wink

If she wants to write a book, she writes it herself and puts it up front!

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Hummm...
Lyra, change you nick to Lyra Conti tongue

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

42 (edited by lyra 2007-01-26 12:32:55)

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Hey all, I just had a realization regarding what Blue mentioned on the previous page................I was just re-reading my piece about "Synchronicities" on my website about 10 minutes ago and realized for the first time, and I don't know why in the world I never noticed this before or why it didn't "click" but, time seems to be moving backwards. Just like Blue said.  All these synchs I mention in my write up seemed to be moving backwards.   The "future" event moved backwards to create the synch that happened just prior, in the "past."  It just clicked today, again, I don't know why I didn't see this.  Because when you read some of the synchs I write about, that really seems to be the only way or explanation for how they could have possibly occurred.   My thoughts and actions were influenced at that present moment to where I was "put into position" like a chess piece you could say in order to create a synch that lined up to something moments in the future.  The future is creating the now, and I think this explains EVERYTHING.   !!!!!  It even explains many of my number sightings, such as the ones that foretell a negative event coming up down the pike.  That negative event has already happened, so technically the numbers are coming after the event.  They are a residual after effect, but we're viewing it all backwards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  This is so exciting!  I love mind bending twistiness where the brain has to contort!  big_smile  But think of the implications!!!   I figured out when I was 17 on my own for my own reasons and personal proof that the past, present and future are happening simultaneously, but it never occurred to me to view all of our present as a direct result of the future, that our very thoughts and actions are being created, influenced and manipulated by future events we have yet to experience!  And probable future timelines definitely do fit into this as well.   I get my negative number indicators that foretell trouble and fighting which has already occurred in the "future".....I find myself positioned like a chess piece to react badly when I get to that point in the future.......but because I now know, I then opt for a different response instead because I've seen the residual after effect numbers.  And my changed response creates a new future. 

It's so mind bending I'm so excited!!!  Weeeeee!!!!   So thanks Blue for sharing your experience with what your higher self told you!  Exciting stuff.....

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

43 (edited by ontrack24 2007-01-26 12:36:28)

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

Yeah, that really seems (quite) plausible to me too...
Just to mention one thing, think about how that could explain the usage and value of reverse speech...

44 (edited by lyra 2007-01-26 12:42:45)

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

ontrack24 wrote:

Yeah, that really seems (quite) plausible to me too...
Just to mention one thing, think about how that could explain the usage and value of reverse speech...

You know, you may be right.  I've always been a skeptic of reverse speech and have voiced my skepticism about it on NR in several threads, only because some people really get a bit cuckoo with it, hearing what they want to hear it seems and interpreting what amounts to gibberish in a very liberal way.  BUT.....if we're going to say that time is moving backwards, then indeed, it would have to affect everything I'd think....including speech.

This is just so exciting though.  I've had all the pieces together, and even had them positioned in their proper places, but just never connected them all together.  It's going to give me tons to think about this weekend.  Makes me see everything differently.....

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: The galactic alignment of 2012 already happened......In 1998.

And don't forget about mirrors! Contain something you don't want on one side, implant a trigger, and hope the right/wrong person views it first.

I think that anyone whose seen the movie "Prince of Darkness" should be terrified. lol

Time here is not the same there. It flows more like a river with tributaries constantly branching and returning, but it doesn't all flow the same way either! Sometimes the best way to see if something there has started is to see if it's been finished first, and that which is finished becomes a guide leading to what is coming once something starts. This is hard to imagine in 3D, but it's as close as I can say it.

-3G