Re: Magnetics and Ascension
The bible was written 300+ years post the death of (the supposed) Jesus Christ. I sincerely doubt that Jesus wrote the very few (in red) remarks in the bible and told his followers to throw them in in a few hundred years and try and get it right. The bible has also been retranslated 125 times into all different languages. There is no way to directly translate Aramaic into English (nor any other language…I’m sure you’ve heard it’s an old language) nor visa versa. All of the translations were done by people with agendas, like kings and other rulers. We are their surfs, so it stands to reason they'd want us to be enlightened so they'd help us.
As i said "the bible hardly records what Jesus said". There are very few quotes. But what is there can be diciphered even after the translations. I have often given interpretations which reveal a multi-levelled meaning of certain scriptural quotes. Deep truths are revealed in those quotes so someone has done a fair job in writing them and in translating them. Francis Bacon participated in the translations of the King James version of the bible. Bacon became an Adept who later became the Count St Germain who worked with Blavatsky's sponsors. Because Bacon played an influential role in Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry he has been slandered by some modern "researchers" interested only in character assasination. St Germain is pictured with El Morya And Koothumi standing behind Helena Petrovna Blavatsky in a famous photograph from around the 1870s. Koothumi was St Francis of Assisi (a close disciple of Jesus) and El Morya was, among other historical greats, treated badly by the two King Henrys.(the soul of Peter). Dharma and Karma, draw souls together in mutual service.
By that spirit, which is also my own, i confirm for myself where they have placed their hand.
There's nothing unusual in spiritual communion/resonance with spiritual beings. It is natural to recognise the familiar. Something like picking your mother's face out of a crowded room.
If you are a descendent the Jesus' spirit then it sure seems your time and effort could be better utilized in a manner more productive than in not addressing the issues I pointed out. Surely, you are needed more desperately somewhere (other than NR) where it seems most of us can think for ourselves. You needed to start a Jesus thread and there you could expound upon the subject to your hearts content instead of interjecting Jesus into threads (constantly) and throwing the thread. You even got him into HPB. I'd be curious to know if you think God also wrote his portion of the bible. If he did, I have a few bones to pick with him. Would you ask him if he did? If he did would you please include his email address in your next response to me. I'm assuming your close connection with Jesus makes you privy to his familial info.
I did adress all the issues you pointed out to me and i do respect the right of everyone to think for themselves, that's why i contribute. I informed anyone who is interested that HPB was the same soul as Peter. You can determine the veracity of that for yourself but you questioned me about it and i gave you an honest answer. Others, who have not expressed the desire to censor me, might be more interested than yourself. Wherever i've included Jesus or Christ in a thread, which is quite often, i have seen the relevance. Others have seen it too and have expressed no offense (on that score at least). Sometimes they've expressed their appreciation. Your anti- HPB stance (which you're entitled to) is turning into an anti- nexus stance (which you're also entitled to). You can challenge me if you want but if you have any bones to pick with God i suggest you take them up with God. God can answer all your questions about what is true or false in the bible and anywhere else.
As to "getting Jesus into HPB" it was quite unavoidable given that HPB's soul was once Jesus' disciple Peter and given that Jesus is a part of the Great White Brotherhood (White= white light) which sponsored the soul of Peter in Blavatsky's TS works. The connections between all these people have been discussed for nearly 70 yrs in the esoteric literature and i accept that it is true. You wondered why the TS was pitched so high and i gave an explanation which necessarilly included the work of the brotherhood which sponsored HPB. Would you prefer people kept their replies within more acceptable parameters? Leave out the truth as they see it perhaps?
PS. If HPB was off on Lucifer being the light and the way (which is what I THINK you are saying and I KNOW is what she said) could it possibly be that she was off on other stuff? Or maybe her channeling was vital and true when it coincided with yours. So is Lucifer the way as HPB said? And why not? Things (like names of dieties...lucifer does mean the light and clarity as in lucid) could their names have been reversed, way back when, to throw off humanity from the truth…oh, wait, that has never and cannot happen.
The thing that upset me was the distortions on lucifer. It caused me some grief to find it amongst HPB work. No, lucifer is not the way as HPB said. Lucifer means light and lucifer was a great being of light. But he eventually refused to serve the Christ in All and was cast out of the higher realms (with his loyal cohorts) into the physical and astral planes. He became a self styled enemy of God. In revenge they took it out on us as we also fell into duality consciousness and became vulnerable to their machinations.
As far as HPBs work being "vital and true when it coincided with yours" what can i say PJ? Who determines the truth of anything for myself but myself? And who determines it for you but yourself? We have our discussion and others decide for themselves. The things i don't know much about i don't talk much about. I am not pretending to know it all. The little i know, i talk about and like anyone, i share what i see is true. There is nothing unhealthy about that.
There is such a thing as letting it rest because, honestly, I could pick apart your post and point out a bunch of (I apologize, but there's not other word for it) crap, but there's no point. I don't want you to think differently, your truth is your truth, but there a lot of people that subscribe that need to know that your truth may not be the only truth (which is how you present it).
You're welcome to pick apart anything i say. If you think something is crap there's nothing wrong with holding it up and showing me why you think it is. That's better than trying to censor me. Everyone here is capable of making up their own mind about the quality and source of ideas.
