Dolores Cannon (Page 1 of 4)

Ahh, let 'em listen.   They apparantly have nothing better to do!  lol    Oh yeah, that reminds me...when Tom was back in Iowa last month we had some kind of weird "disturbance" while talking on the phone to each other one night.   Can't remember exactly how it sounded, but it was pretty obvious something was listening in.   We were like huh...Hi guys!    Gave 'em a big hello, then forgot about it three seconds later, on to our discussion.  And I totally forgot about it til right now, reading your post.  haha   The ideal mindset to have is one of not caring.   Other people get all freaked out by phone tapping and all that....not me!  I say hi and laugh and am on to other things, forgetting about it three seconds after the fact.   So let 'em listen.   They will anyway. 

Fighting back against abductions with everything you have, that's the spirit.  The trick though is to not have hostility while doing so.  To have a neutral mindset, like you're dealing with a mosquito.   "No...you won't take me....(side step) No, you're not going to snag me tonight, (side step)  No, I don't think so, (slipping out of their grip)  Guess I will be staying up all night then (side step)  or leaving the apartment if I have to (ducking out) but you're not going to take me.  Sorry."   Then give them a pat on the head and be on your merry way.   

That's a good point, and one that I forgot to mention in my opening post.  It was already getting pretty lengthy, so I cut it off to save the rest for later.  But anybody who's done the research will soon see that things are not as they appear in this world, and that we have some behind the scenes string pullers going on - influencing wars, religion, and who runs the world.  And these string pullers aren't human.   And last time I checked, wars and fear-inducing power tripping religions designed for control are not positive.  So what does that say about the nature of those non-human string pullers manipulating these things?  Well, Dolores Cannon doesn't even get into that, no mention of the negative hyperdimensional controllers.  Oh well.

The book is still interesting though, and a worthwhile read, totally unique and very hard to put down.   I'm a total sucker for any of the transcripts pertaining to people's lives on other planets, or as something other than human.   And especially Atlantis, for some reason!    The kicker is how believable the regressions are.  These people may be a non-human on another planet, but their lives are still relatively mundane!   Nothing flashy and crazy, sounding like a sci-fi movie.    And the Atlantis transcripts were absolutely fascinating to me.   The people went into their regressions with preconceived ideas about things, and were in for a rude awakening to the reality of what daily life was like in Atlantis.  One guy was so disturbed by what he was seeing he got freaked out and asked to leave, please, NOW.

The other thing that really got me was how so many of the concepts that were mind bending to Dolores, such as parallel timelines, the nature of time, etc., and various "weirdness" that people were revealing to her during their trance state, was stuff that I figured out on my own, years back, and which is totally natural and normal to me.   

There was also some stuff which I won't get into here but which matched up with some "insights" that I gleaned over the past year or so, about the nature of who I am and what's going on with me being here.  And I found stuff that matched it in her book, like, to a T.  VERY trippy. 

These are books like no other, talking about bezillions of fascinating concepts.   They're cram packed with stuff.  It's never a dull moment when you read!

The "Convoluted Universe" series are awesome! Dolores said she wrote it primarily for all those mindblowing concepts that would bend your mind like a pretzel. Well, more like light stretching for those of us already familiar with alternative ideas, but whatever the case her material is fascinating. It draws upon sessions from so many different people that if one turns you off, maybe another has something you resonate with. So it's interesting enough to keep your attention, but varied enough that you also get to train your B.S. detector.

She gives an impression of sincerity, warmth, dedication, and open mindedness...but also a level of innocence that borders on naivete when it comes to trusting certain sources. One in particular, which in my view is a primary source of contamination in her work, calls itself "The Collective" - an alien race claiming responsibility for human abductions under benevolent intentions. They come through different hypnotized clients and pick up where they last left off despite these clients not knowing each other, which impressed Dolores because that is an unequivocal demonstration of a non-fabricated source.

What I noticed about "The Collective" is that they sounded identical in tone and content to the various entities that spoke through Lyssa Royal in "Visitors from Within." It employed the same cavalier rationalizions, psychophatic charm, and exploitation of psychological blindspots and ego vulnerabilities. Same tone, same content. Obviously, no deceptive source would admit malicious intent, and would instead stalk their victims into blissful submission. In a video of a talk she gave, about four times did she mention that "it's all positive, there is nothing negative about this" when referring to alien abductions, their genetic meddling, and alien / government underground bases. That, I cannot buy based on personal experience, intuition, anecdotes from others, and all I have read on this subject. People need to be careful when seeking higher awareness; the sheer awe of fringe information can become so intoxicating that discernment gets thrown out the window.

A good chunk of information from The Collective can be found in her book "The Custodians." Now, bearing in mind the similarity between that and "Visitors from Within" by Lyssa Royal, I'm kinda perplexed if not disturbed at the following:

Draw your own conclusions from this. One thing that comes to mind is an article by Goro Adachi - part of his Stargate Cipher series, that discusses this pic:

Another would be the book "The Stargate Conspiracy" where some of the Council of Nine channelings were called into question as possibly being part of government mind control experiments involving hypnotic programming and voice-to-skull EM transmissions. They came through Uri Geller and Bobby Horne when hypnotized by Puharich.

And hypnosis is how Cannon gets in touch with The Collective. Considering that her clients come to her, it's not farfetched to say that despite the majority being healthy and psychologically independent subjects, some may have been previously programmed, implanted, etc... and brought to her in order to function as conduits for disinformation. I'm not sure whether this would be military, alien, or some combination of both.

But, this should not detract from the rest of her material, which as I said before is fascinating and worth checking out. And in all honesty, perhaps this stuff from The Collective is what keeps her alive and able to disseminate the good stuff as well. If she took a stance closer to Karla Turner, she might have met the same fate.

Cannon emphasizes that her goal is more to expand your mind to new ideas that make you believe anything, so it's a take-what-resonates-and-leave-the-rest affair. It does require sorting, filtering, and if you don't have the time or patience for that then maybe save these books for when you do.

Jen,
Are you being serious?

I imagine yes, because this topic has come up before.

The RA material goes into detail about 5th density negative entitie(s) that consistently attempted to disrupt the communication.

All is one?  Of course.  Does that mean that we ignore negative polarity??

Knowing your level of disrespect for both of us and this forum, and your self-claimed enjoyment of being a trickster and playing games, I question your sincerity in asking this question. I answered it for the benefit of the very few others who might actually listen to the response.

Over the past month you have been desperately attempting to draw out a response from myself or Lyra, using methods from the subtle to silly to pathetic, and now addressed both of us directly, together, with a provocative question that as Wandering1 has pointed out, has been discussed before.

Additionally, I very rarely bring up Seth and only occasionally the Ra Material, Lyra does so far less except mentioning how Seth got her introduced to metaphysical cosmology, so your saying we have an "oft-stated admiration" for these sources is baloney because you're making it sound like we hold these sources to be gospel and push them at every turn. Perhaps you are projecting upon us what you yourself are doing with your various channeling sources.

A sincere question from a sincere member is one thing, yours is something else. Knock off the silly games and covert hostility, as you are wearing out your welcome.

.........except, as montalk clearly stated, neither one of us are going around "oft stating" our "admiration" for these sources. 

You danced right over that part though and continue to push this thing about the supposed "conflicts" between the philosophies of these books and our beliefs regarding aliens and abductions.

Maybe you didn't read what montalk said? 

Maybe you only see what you want to see? 

Either way, it's a fallacy to ignore it and continue to push your version of events.

Nobody said you were on the "warpath."  Putting words in people's mouths.   

No, actually, apparantly you don't.  And your posts reveal that.

....And now you're twisting things around - yet more logical fallacies - by claiming that montalk must be "insecure" to be responding to you as he is................instead of acknowledging the real reason for his response, which is that you're making claims about us that are not true.

I think you need to get your hands on a good course in logic and reasoning for debate, Jen.  Soon.  But this is the reason that posting here has become such a turn off over the past few months, posters like this, doing stuff like this.  It's just too much.

Lyra -- years ago I was a member of a very defined group.  At that time, my then husband was one of the big shots -- did the average guy go after him?  Nope -- after me.  Constantly in various little ways -- or big ways.

Just watch who attacks you and you'll see the people who wish they could attack Tom directly but don't dare. 

Ahhh -- the price one pays for partnership <grin> --  but it's a very workable tool actually -- you can see who wants the group to fail.

Warm regards,
Christine B.