thanks that really lifted me up, i was feelin a little low

kind regards all
z

I dunno if my son is an Indigo or an alien, but his art is
pretty fantastic, I think: http://www.vocaleyes.com/benzart/

He's older than she--23.

God knows, but her art is flippin' fantastic!!

http://www.artakiane.com/home.htm

<snip>
Broward County, FL births = C-section.  I think maybe C-sections equate to more $$$ in hospitals' pockets in many instances.  I believe that was the angle that "New Times" was going for in their expose about Broward General.  I also read that C-sections are HUGELY popular down in Brazil, and MOST women are apparantly getting them now, whether they need them or not......for vanity reasons.  They don't want to go through the trouble, pain and after affects of a vaginal birth.   But I do wonder what the other conspiracy possibilities are.   Anybody have any ideas?

Your last example showed that there are people who are just so superficially focused that they would not even be interested in this.  C-section easier?  Do it, do it!  The women who are frightened into having them at the last minute are in a very vulnerable position--as you say, they trust the doctors and to them it seems only right to follow their advice.  But people have to take responsibility for their own decisions.  A woman who is going to give birth certainly has the responsibility to
get informed about all the options and their repercussions.  My own son's birth was very difficult, but the question of a C section never came up, and I never would have consented to it. 

Bottom line, we are only going to be subject to conspiracies as long as we are not
in charge of our own lives.

. If one wished to catch a thread of the mutation of people consider that one in five births is C-section. These children usually were not able to survive the birth proccess, but now according to some, these children cannot reproduce without the technology and are thusly termed Homo Technologist.

What do you mean can't reproduce without the technology?   Are you saying for instance, that a female baby born via C-section won't be able to in turn grow up and give birth to her own children the natural way?

Never heard of such a thing.  It doesn't even make sense.   However, I *have* heard that a woman who has one C-section must have all her other babies the same way thereafter.   That makes sense.  But what you're saying doesn't.

Also, the huge increase in C-sections doesn't actually (usually...) have anything to do with a problematic birth or a baby who can't survive the birth process....anymore.  It used to be done for that reason....but now?  Nope.   So you are onto something in that regard, about the huge increase in C-sections. 

Where I used to live, Broward County, Florida, had the highest # of C-sections in the nation, if I remember correctly.   It's actually a conspiracy of sorts, and the local alternative newsper, "New Times" did an expose piece regarding what in the frickity frack is going ON.   In their expose, they showed how Broward General Hospital Docs will try to convince a woman at the last minute to have a C-section, even when it's not necessary.  During the labor countdown they'll suddenly come up with some "issue" to throw at the mom, and INSIST that she must get a C-section.  Panicked and worried........and usually medically ignorant.......she'll usually say yes. 

I worked with a lady who was preggo while living in FL, and after reading that I wondered to myself, "hmm...wonder if they'll make her get a C-section?"

It wasn't on her mind going in...................but sure enough, come to find out that in the end the baby was delivered (drum roll please!) VIA C-SECTION!   So, no surprise there.

Broward County, FL births = C-section.  I think maybe C-sections equate to more $$$ in hospitals' pockets in many instances.  I believe that was the angle that "New Times" was going for in their expose about Broward General.  I also read that C-sections are HUGELY popular down in Brazil, and MOST women are apparantly getting them now, whether they need them or not......for vanity reasons.  They don't want to go through the trouble, pain and after affects of a vaginal birth.   But I do wonder what the other conspiracy possibilities are.   Anybody have any ideas?

Thanks for that info, Lyra. 
I'll check out the crystalinks link for more.
I know exactly what you mean about peach colored walls.
My stepmother painted their bedroom that color and I knew
right then that we wouldn't get along. 
And from reading your many posts I would never ever get the
impression that you are limited in any way.  Your knowledge base
appears to be encyclopedic and that's impressive.
TP

Well, I hope you weren't poking fun.    But I did laugh out loud, because if you're serious it's kind of funny that I do remember all these tidbits of info., but at least 50 times on any given day I lose my glasses.    "Where are my glasses?" "Have you seen my glasses??"  No exaggeration. Not a day goes by!

I bet if I had more colors in my aura I'd be more on the ball!    haha j/k

Hi Lyra, all,
Would someone please tell me what a blue aura is supposed to indicate?
Indigo is the basic color of new Lee Rider jeans, kind of a Navy blue.
Would a person(?) with only one color to their aura mean that they
are limited in their function?  As to the emotional response usually
evoked by the color blue it is: cool, cold, intellectual and unemotional.
Any thoughts?
TP

From what I know of the color blue, and how it relates to New Agey type stuff, blue is the color of ascension.  When one is spiritually advancing, they gravitate towards blue, or blue is the color assigned to that sort of phenomenon.  Ellie Crystal has talked about this over at www.crystalinks.com, so that's a good place to look for some general info.

Blue can indeed represent being cool, cold, intellectual and unemotional, but don't forget that clear, clean water and a clear, clean cloudless sky are also blue.  Blue is also a known calming color, naturally soothing to the psyche.   So it has both aspects to it.    When I was growing up I was tormented with a room that came already painted with peach colored walls.  It was maddening to me.  I wasn't allowed to change the color until we put the house up for sale, and when finally given my choice of color, I adamently proclaimed "BLUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"   Needless to say, my last year and a half spent in that room felt completely different.  It was like a new room, with a TOTALLY different vibe.   Like night and day, a 180 turnaround.  SOO much more tranquil and pleasant.

As far as one being limited in their function when having an all blue aura, I don't necessarily think so.  I used to work with somebody who could see auras, long before I ever heard about Indigos.  For fun I would ask her some days, "So what's my aura look like today?"

She'd gloss her eyes over and squint, and the response was always "Blue."  One time there was some yellow going on over my head, but always it was blue, blue, blue.  I was like, "What the hell??  Why don't I ever have any other colors??"    I don't know if this makes me "indigo";  I think I'm too old to qualify for Indigo status, being that I was born in 1974.  But at any rate, I don't feel limited having a supposedly predominantly blue aura.

I look at it this way:   People can choose to believe that there's no such thing as Indigos, but if kids really are being born with all-blue auras, then people can't dispute that I guess.  It would be like proclaiming "I don't believe in blonde haired people!"