Well here is some further light to shed on the subject

'C' Session 971231

Q: Is there some issue about asking this question of accuracy that needs to be
addressed? One main thing is: the presence of certain persons. Some sessions were
more accurate than others depending upon who was present...
A: You got it!!!
Q: Therefore, it would be difficult to assess an accuracy rating for the C's
themselves...
A: Bingo!
Q: But, we CAN assess the material itself, keeping in mind that some parts can be
more accurate than others...
A: 71.7.
Q: Okay, that takes into account corruption from different people, typos,
reconstruction, and so forth. And, the same applies to the Ra Material... (A) Okay,
suppose I have a sentence that the Great Pyramid was built 10,000 years ago, but
really it was built yesterday, and you would give 70 per cent accuracy to this
statement.
A: No.
Q: But only one word is inaccurate...
A: You are searching for a concrete formula within a vacuum of abstraction. The only
way to get an accurate measurement is to wait until you can include the sum total of all
the words, then determine accuracy as a percentage of the total. With the total of all
words, and each individual word as the unit of measurement. And on that note, until
the next time, Good Night.

which actually adds to their credibility imho...

Hehehe. Hmmmmmmn. Okay

But they would, by definition, be non-human.

which actually adds to their credibility imho...go bush

The people on this site are warm, friendly, intelligent, balanced, open, wise ... "noble" !   You can just feel it, there is really a good vibe about it here.     I don't say much but I do keep an eye on things.   More often that not my own thoughts and feelings are expressed and mirrored brilliantly by the other members which is really nice as it feels like I among minds that are one with my own. (which is probably more true than I realise!)

Without meaning to be negative towards to the cass group, I do notice that there is much more of a   balanced feel here.   Each individual is kind of true to themselves,   there is no sheep mentality or needing to have "approval" from any "leaders" etc.     There is no fear here.

I believe the C's site is the "last test" for potential ones.     The problems with it are so subtle, so hard to clarify but you can only just feel it intuitively.   Something isn't "right" there.   If you're in tune with yourself, and aligned to truth, you kind of find yourself erm, here!!!     

But that's just my personal opinion.   I don't want to add to the fire of separation.   I love the Cass group in their own special way.   I still read the C's valuable transcripts which leads me to much good thinking.   If I hadn't have found them I wouldn't have found Montalk.     They are just a stepping stone on the path, doing their bit and acting out their role,   just as they should      

Cheers
DALE

Actually, I sincerely laughed at his comment.   (No offense...I thought it was intended for me!    It was hard to tell who was the intended target with all those quotes going on!)     Despite that I still laughed.     I admit, it gave me a chuckle.     This was the turning point for me, what made me go from being upset at this whole fiasco to just flat out laughing and realizing how crazy it is.

I'll admit, I smirked. Slightly. But only because a comment like that betrays how much disdain they have for us lowly humans, being that they hold the company of such advanced sixth density entities all day over at the cult farm. I'm sure we're just dull by comparison.

I don't think that was the response he was after though.......... : /  ?

thoth (Neomatrix) wrote:

lyra wrote:

The C's aren't aliens.

But they would, by definition, be non-human.

yeah, maybe you'll be something other than a human some day too...with any luck.

Balor

Gee, Balor. I suppose I should be insulted? Nice try, I guess. The day uninspired comments like this manages to provoke any kind of response from me other than a bored yawn is the day I sign up to Casschat.

Interesting that it was okay for Laura and Ark and the Cass group to publicly slam Montalk and anybody associated with him, but god forbid anybody should turn the microscope back around on them.    They can't handle it.  Watch the heads start rolling and the tears of indignation start flowing! 

thoth wrote:

lyra wrote:

The C's aren't aliens.

But they would, by definition, be non-human.

yeah, maybe you'll be something other than a human some day too...with any luck.

Balor

HA!

lyra wrote:

The C's aren't aliens.

But they would, by definition, be non-human.

yeah, maybe you'll be something other than a human some day too...with any luck.

Balor

I couldn't believe it. I thought these people were open to dicovering the truth, but it seems like they've decided that they already know the truth, and you shouldn't dare challenge it!

I've noticed that this is often a pattern whenever higher level information is given to humans. Instead of this information actually inspiring us to become more aware, and to ask more questions, and to become more involved, it usually ends up having quite the opposite effect. The material becomes gospel, and anyone who questions the official interpretation of it is immediately ostracized. I am often reminded of just how much of a child race we humans really are. I admit that sometimes this is very depressing to me, because it seems to have been this way for a very long time already. As Bill Hicks would say, "Time to evolve, folks."

Amen to that.

I think I will do likewise. Cheers!

Around 2002, however, after the channeling ended, I noticed a huge change in the writing style of Laura K-J. I don't know how to describe it except that she seemed to have an agenda. I also attempted to check out the 'CassChat' Yahoo group, which is focused on discussion of the concepts from the C transscripts, but had a very hard time adjusting to the vibe there. The mindset there is so parochial that if you mention anything outside their viewpoint you're cast out like a leper. I posted about a topic from the Ra channelings and was accused of being Vincent Bridges in disguise, trying to disrupt the discussion. LOL! I couldn't believe it. I thought these people were open to dicovering the truth, but it seems like they've decided that they already know the truth, and you shouldn't dare challenge it!

And this is my current opinion about the entire Casspaean 'fan base.' It may not exactly be a cult, but they take the C channelings as gospel, and have formed a very narrow view of reality, in my opinion. It's NOT an environment conducive to open-minded discussion of reality. It's very different from a forum such as this where we have people from all sorts of backgrounds, beliefs, and attitudes, and yet we're all in search of a greater truth and we feed off each other's contributions without insult or mockery. Truly an STO learning environment, if I've ever seen one.

For the record, I still resonate strongly with the C channelings, but I find the Cassiopaean web site in general to be a distraction, so I avoid it nowadays.

There is a big difference between the words that were transcribed as being from these "6th density" entities and the research that Laura Knight-Jadczyk did on her own.

I am in the process of reading through these sessions, and they are a lot better than LKJ's other work which I had previously looked at (which I still view as total bunk). LKJ just doesn't strike me as a very intellectual sort, so it doesn't surprise me that even the C's sometimes express bemusement at her inability to grasp certain concepts. But, yes, definitely more interesting if still a little unclear/vague at times. I will keep reading them and post again later.