edit - I have posted a thread about it here:
http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=6383
It is got a bit long so I made a new thread.

pls try to help and improve my article. Its about time wikipedia is filled with this stuff.

[CHACHA.COM] will help you search for crap that doesn't exist

I've never learned to dance the Cha Cha. It's on my list though.

pls try to help and improve my article. Its about time wikipedia is filled with this stuff.

[CHACHA.COM] will help you search for crap that doesn't exist

"Cassiopedia is a project of the Quantum Future Group, Inc. In a world filled with disinformation, our goal is to create The True Encyclopedia."  A true encyclopedia?  Have you ever studied the validity of the Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Cassiopaeans   source writers?  If you find a source of information that has a legal disclaimer to what they write are you still going to believe all that they say?
.

forget what cassiopeans or ra or whoever said what. By now if you dont agree about polarity and density then you really need to do your homework.

i mean its all around you, look at the animals vs us. They force feed by killing, We do the excat same thing i.e. slaughter chickens/cows/sheep to feed.

Stealing from nature. Do we have a right ? Yes you do if you swing 'that way' i.e. negative/sts.

Positive beings can meditate and 'feed' from the sun. Just one of the many ways to 'feed' in sto way. Explain how some people go without food and water for months and all they do is meditate. Where there is a Will there is a Way.

Btw didnt know they made a wiki now, beautiful, screw wikipedia then.

[edit] Density (universe)
Density (universe) 
Pseudo-science / ufology / twaddle. We could delete the present state of the article on the grounds of no context but I will do the author's job for them and say that it comes from Cassiopaea. We deleted a set of related articles back in 2005: Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Cassiopaeans and 6th density. I doubt if it has become any more notable in the last two years. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete WP:OR = mebe I should begin writing articles about Physiology of Yoda da ancient jedi mastah or The magical effect of yoga on the inner self? -- ??ß??????~? ?ƒ ???? (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete - no notability is my reasoning for deletion. The fact that I think it's complete and utter bullshit would just be WP:IDONTLIKEIT, so go for the first reason. - mattbuck 02:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy Delete this hoax. It's not even OR. It's fraudulent. Majoreditor (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Awghhh, so you're saying I shouldn't start thinking about creating my article about YODA? -- ??ß??????~? ?ƒ ???? (talk) 03:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete as unsourced and non-notable philosophy (to be charitable). Was deproded by creator without solving the PROD concerns at all. Excellent research, RHaworth. DMacks (talk) 03:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete as entirely OR. The article claims that the universe has seven densities. About the seventh, it states, "7th Density is where you are in Union with the One where you merge back with the 'Is-ness' of 'All that IS'. No more 'I' just one Being. Call it God if you like." This statement is not attributed to any source, not even a crazy man's blog. RJC Talk 04:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete flaky original research. And I think I smell WP:BULLSHIT. Dethme0w (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete, original research, although good faith should be assumed that someone just has an healthy imagination and ignorant of WP's rules. hateless 05:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete. “Original research”. —SlamDiego?T 10:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete It is indeed original research. Unreferenced too, at that. ? LADY GALAXY 14:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete as WP:OR and nonsense. JJL (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete as original research; a load of claims that seem dubious to me. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete per above, citing WP:OR and WP:N. Even if bizarre, pseudoscientific theories may be notable if there is significant coverage in independent, reliable sources - though, in most cases, the notability rests with the author or proponent of the theory. Either way, there's no data here to suggest that this is anything more than an original essay. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

"Cassiopedia is a project of the Quantum Future Group, Inc. In a world filled with disinformation, our goal is to create The True Encyclopedia."  A true encyclopedia?  Have you ever studied the validity of the Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Cassiopaeans   source writers?  If you find a source of information that has a legal disclaimer to what they write are you still going to believe all that they say?

How do you discern what is correct information or disinformation?  By checking it's source.  A person with credentials are legally liable for what they print as truth.

If you want to be a true investigative person always question the source of the information you are reading and question their agenda.  The culture of our world is changing rapidly because of the internet.  Sometimes one has to question what one reads.  Someone who says they have the truth and are exposing the liars could very well be unsrupulpus frauds with potentially negative life alternating consequences.

"Amateur hour has arrived, and the audience is running the show." andrew keen

If you want to educate - yourself start by studying who Ken Adachi is.  The web of deceit never ends.

if i dont start with density levels how do you expect me to reach sts/sto negative/positive workings ?

Well you have this whole thing about the STS/STO deal, that's obviously your big interest.  In my opinion that's the stuff one studies after they've learned the gist of the foundational issues............which the majority has not.  So if one wants to "make a difference" in the world via Wikipedia, then they should ideally start with the majority of what's out there.....and that's real people with real issues who only understand nuts and bolts concrete stuff.  That's the majority of who's probably reading Wiki.  Every day people.  The average middle to lower class person who's just trying to survive in life and make sense of what they're hearing on the news and reading in the papers does not care about "STO vs. STS."  It has no practical application to their little world.  They haven't even learned the basics yet.  However, if your target audience are the ones that have learned the basics, then go for it.  I'm only telling you this because you're trying to put pressure on the forum to make sure this article gets out there, saying that we need to "take a stand!" in capital letters and that this is going to make a difference.    So my feedback is, if you want to make a difference via Wikipedia, which is most likely read by average every day people, then write material that will teach important nuts and bolts - practical - concepts. 

End of 4 cents input....

If i just start an article about the workings of sto guys or sts guys it cannot be backedup unless they density levels are explained and understood.

When I look around outside at the world and the people that are in it where I live, in Virginia, I see middle to lower class, often times blue collar workers who watch TV, read the newspapers, and believe that America is what they've been told it is.

Many still believe that our presence in Iraq is a good thing, because we're "defending freedom and democracy!" Because that's what they've been told.  Never mind the corruption that's going on over there, that's not even on their personal radars.

The concept of a rigged political system where only those with the right backgrounds and bloodlines and those "in the know" get to be front and center stage is foreign to them.  They still believe that any old person can become Prez.  Because that's what they were told.   At BEST, there are regular every day schmoes who know of the concept of judges and politicians who can "be bought."  That's it.  The rest is in the realm of conspiracy theory as far as they're concerned, never mind the mounds of research and evidence that's out there.

And something like 9/11....we're 6 years and 4 months on and the idea that our government had a hand in the operation is still considered delusional by the average person.  Only the smallest fringes of society are willing to consider or believe such an idea despite the overwhelming mountains of evidence that proves the official story wrong, from the background of who the hijackers were, to the hijacking of the planes and the FAA's role, to the buildings going down to the Pentagon. 

And those are just three biggies off the top of my head.  Forget all the other ways in which the reality around us is fake, rigged or illusion, or topics such as mind control, abductions, military experimentation on its own personnel, and so on.  But these are people who seem unable to notice the discrepancies between what they've been told, and how the world actually is.  And they're lacking the means to wake up due to their socio-economic positions.  Forget getting to the "higher spiritual concepts" such as what density is what.   

You want to make a difference then in my opinion, it needs to be about subjects that actually affect the real world people in a real way.  The sorts of stuff that's talked about on Rense.com, (although I'm not a supporter of Rense.com only because there's lots of questionable material mixed up in it, among other issues I won't side track onto here).  But you get the idea.  Somebody goes to Wikipedia and damn...there's an article outlining all the ways in which 9/11 was an inside job, or how our political system really operates and who's really who in politics and world leaders; how money is the biggest scam perpetuated on us ever, with dozens of proof citations and bonus references for where to go to get oneself "off the grid"; or some "true history of America" articles...................the stuff they don't tell us in history class in school. !   Or the ways in which our educational system are completely rigged and flawed to work in the Powers That Be's favor in order to dumb down society.

Now that would be cool.  These are all subjects that have already been written about extensively by conspiracy and fringe researchers.........so there are already existing books, articles and websites out there that one could cite.  It takes care of both the citation/reference and "original material" problems right there.   Then you put it into Wiki's standard format that they require, and you're already mostly on your way. 

And that's the sort of material that's worth "taking a stand" for and worth investing one's time and personal energy into in order to start making dents, in my opinion......

Look at the bright side though, once everything that we know is on that website, a lot of people can suddenly make a difference.

Its all about compiling and cross referencing whats already out there.

Some good websites i know, while i cannot verifly they are 100% accurate:

http://www.cassiopaea.org Main site, http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/waveindex.htm Wave Series

http://www.llresearch.org/library/the_l … ne_pdf.htm Ra material

http://www.grantchronicles.com/astro15.htm More advanced info about higher densities

http://www.freewebs.com/the4thdensity/about.htm some decent info here

this is it for now, i'll post later