"Charity   suffereth   long, and is kind; charity envieth not;..."

The quote you presented, I can only get a vague tenuity on its interpretation.  Yet, you seem to completely understand it.  You are a better scholar than I.

We are not, "active in the chart."  We don't know how to allign our intentions with each day we live.

I would say that you simply spewed platitudes, trite drivel that has been presented so many countless times already, with harsh judgemental disdain directed at so many human beings.  But I won't.  Direction to look at ourselves is never used excessively. 

I've been to Thurmont, MD many times.  I live pretty far from there, now.  From Hagerstown, you have to drive east through the mountains.  Just mentioning that since the name was on the gravestone.

The saying, "never trust a man who does not know what he wants" is revealing in that you can discern this type of person by their graspings and gropings to possess things.  Gurjieff mentioned that knowledge is a thing.  It is material.  Not knowing what he wants being apparent by the daily life of a person engaged with fulfilling desires.  This type of person is known by their drive to acquire, to possess.  It can also be a natural thing, in that this greed to possess knowlege is merely a manifestation of a person wanting to know why he is here.  It will always be known as greed, in that many of these types usually trample others in their quest, when they should already realize that we are Self, One, and in certain steps, this is literally true.  So, a person who doesn't know what he wants, usually reveals this in the fact that he appears to want everything.  A person who does not know what he wants, means it would probably be a bad thing studying Crowley's particular endeavors.  Realization by a person of what is the highest goal can keep a person safe from becoming immersed or enmeshed within whatever successes in these Crowlian style endeavors might lead him to. 

If blood = semen, and death = ecstasy, and kill = ejaculation, then there is no evidence of sacrifice, but it points to a deviation from the original tantric ritual, which did not entail sexual relations as part of the ceremonies.  I realize that I may still be inaccurate in that a communion with a divine spirit has been compared with the extreme pleasures experienced in sexual relations.  So there you still have something pointing to virtue, in that there is only being stated, a comparison to some feeling which we are familiar with, in describing the sensation of communion with your own god, your personal spirit.

And what is your definition of 'goetics' ? The best I found was the following;

Goetics: 

You wrote, 'condoned the Christ consciousness and then ...willingly turned your back on salvation.'  It made me lose one of the 72, now I gotta do some goetics to get it back.  I think it went into the computer.

Oh! I want to mention just one more thing, That which is The Divine Originant I would not refer to as God, as I would be using a limiting or diminutive definition.  I think the reason we got this enforced monotheism is because people would be worshipping either the same god using various names due to varying regions, or worshipping gods by correct names but as if this god is the ALL, BOUNDLESS, DIVINE ORIGINANT, CAUSELESS CAUSE.  The hierarchies intermediate, now, are all referred to as angels.  They're all seen as never having to go through physical incarnations like we are doing.  Ah, I'm trying to say a lot with a few words.  In not the too far off distant future, we will be gods ourselves.  That is not blasphemy, go see the word HaShem.  It is one more referent to the notion that we should not attempt to define, thus putting limit to the LIMITLESS.

I'm not lecturing just putting thoughts out there.  Don't get me wrong, I am stupid enough to lecture people that are smarter than me.

He who does not like to read, is the equal of one who cannot read - Anon

So, there you have it.  I don't believe anything anybody says.  You can absorb all the information, knowledge, put names to this or that, and understanding will never come unless expansion of consciousness which means merging of consciousness, instill within an individual, the capacity for greater understanding.

If I want to give up my free will and let others determine for me, what I should put my attention to, just remember to have a big wallet, or dispatch my physical body back to the Earth.  So, to date, I feel that my free will, 'lies in the whispering wind' hah! just playing around.  My free will lies in my autonomy of directing my attention.  I dictate where my attention is directed.  I'm the dictator of Antaeus.  In Antaeus realm, the king is generous, regenerative and blesses the honorable and righteous.  His warriors never serve themselves or act out of anger, hatred or vengence.  The lover only marvels in the interconnectedness of ALL.  I don't know what the magician is up to right now.

Bhang replies:
"Neither really. I do not trust any publications 100%. I do not not know who publishes the material, I do not follow every footnote or source, I have no idea if anything being presented is the actual truth. I can only validate my personal experiences, anything that I have not done or experienced is hearsay and must be judged with sound mind and pure heart. As of late I see that I'm guilty of my transgressions against my own soul and the souls of humanity. I participate in fear mongering; for I am frightened and would like to help others with information I find useful for survival into a new world order. Yet I cannot validate any information I pass along even if I find the information archived at multiple "trustworthy" sites.
Old books are much safer than the internet. I've always considered the "web" (venomous, six eyed, eight legged, weaver of silken death with fangs that suck the blood out of it's victim) to be the supreme-anti-trust. We still have a few more years of rather good information streaming through the wires and stored on the servers but if the elite do not get their "internet 2" then it is obvious that a total revamping of the entire structure will be in order; albeit criminal. It will only be another two generations before books are nearly gone and pixelized data will be the standard. I think we all know how vulnerable computer data is.
The point is, we are here discussing, debating and most importantly learning from one another here. I have to say that many of Crowley's writings are profound, even awe inspiring but we cannot escape what his books and writings say about being in league with Satan. Furthermore if you are subscribing to Crowley (Lucifarian Principals) , then you have automatically acknowledged the God of the Bible, and have condoned the Christ consciousness. You have willingly turned your back on salvation. You cannot have a Satan without God.
I think the internet has so much potential for good but is ultimately a tool of evil that will change the world from bad to worse. It has not only enlightened me (turned me into a light bearer) but has changed my mind set and reality tunnels multiple times, turning me into a scatter brained, self proclaimed info warroir, who has only pieces of stories in his head and needs the f*cking internet to explain anything I'm trying to talk about. I know tons of links but I do not know the whole subject of, well... anything! If rock music had not influenced me so much as it did when I was younger, I wonder what my thoughts/feelings towards society would be now? If the internet had not influenced me, I wonder if I would have  a more pure (peaceful)  state of mind and soul?"

Just looking trough this 7 page thread I see how both sides of the fence here are represented. I'm very surprised to see how this video spawned such emotion and fire here. This really is a touchy subject that could be debated infinitum, but I'm convinced that almost any statement can be judged by your heart and life experience in order to determine the probabilities and likelihood of truth in said statement, or as more clearly stated by SiriArc:

I just want to ask. What books did you read and what do you really know about the subjects written about? I like to read authors that actually think crowley ate babies lol. I read texx marrs because he has a lot of great information. Even though he is off in some areas, like saying that all kabbalism is evil and all things occult are of satan and lucifer, I still enjoy the guys writting. I dont really care about his personal beliefs because the information itself is what I care about.

The reason I said f*ck crowley is because it is not about him, it is about the information. YOu are focusing on the man and you are refusing to mention or speak of anything he wrote about. Dont you think that is a bit "low", or that that is the act of a "low vibration feeder"? You know, sacred geometry, alchemy, numerology, tarot, astrology. shamanism and all the rest of it, whether you like it or not, are tools to expand consciousness and to become more aware of ones true nature. If you dont think so, peachy. If you want to live in a fearful supersticious bubble, lovely. YOu can continue to focus on the man and not the information. Im not here to say you cant.

You said of Don Milos blog on the Book of the Law that he is a freemason and is sharing with his freemason friends, and that neither he nor anyone else has a clue. ...hmmmmm low vibration feeders? What do you think about the information instead of jumping to ridiculous conclusions?

Angry

I was wrong to return to this thread as it seems to be a festival for low vibration feeders.

" I was reading a book and looking around within myself to see how I could enlarge my idea of brotherhood. Practice in benevolence will not give it its full growth. I had to find some means of reaching further, and struck on this, which is as old as old age.
    I am not separate from anything. "I am that which is." That is, I am Brahma, and Brahma is everything. But being in an illusionary world, I am surrounded by certain appearances that seem to make me separate. So I will proceed to mentally state and accept that I am all these illusions. I am my friends, -- and then I went to them in general and in particular. I am my enemies; then I felt them all. I am the poor and the wicked; I am the ignorant. Those moments of intellectual gloom are the moments when I am influenced by those ignorant ones who are myself. All this in my nation. But there are many nations, and to those I go in mind; I feel and I am them all, with what they hold of superstition or of wisdom or evil. All, all is myself. Unwisely, I was then about to stop, but the whole is Brahma, so I went to the Devas and Asuras: the elemental world, that too is myself. After pursuing this course awhile I found it easier to return to a contemplation of all men as myself. It is a good method and ought to be pursued, for it is a step toward getting into contemplation of the All. I tried last night to reach up to Brahma, but darkness is about his pavilion"  Letters That Have Helped Me pp 8-9.

    There is nothing so spiritualizing as thinking towards the unthinkable!