PhiConcept wrote:

If someone wants to create a peaceful demonstration they have to aquire a permit from the city  authorities.  Without a permit the police has the right to arrest the partakers of the demonstration.

Well, if you say so.

United States Constitution

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I'd like to appologise for misinforming people about a demonstration permit.  I was disinformed by someone else and didn't bother to look into it myself.   The permit is only necessary if a a bullhorn or a loud speaker is used to communicate the message.  Otherwise, the citizens have the right to a peaceful public free speech as the constitution clearly states it.

I appologise once again for the misinformation.

Peace, PhiConcept.

visavis wrote:

PhiConcept wrote:

If you are moderate, worry free and at the same time aware of your surroundings then you won't run into situations that involve authorities.

With all due respect, that is a horrendously short-sighted statement.

Quite the contrary visavis.  I meant to present my statement in a general form and the formula, if applied towards activities that put a person at risk of opposing authorities, will work perfectly to avoid unnecessary conflict.

I don't know.  Perhaps the pessimism is somewhat unwarranted in the big picture, with my analysis of what I'm seeing with the erosion of liberties.  I'm not sure, maybe in the bigger picture we are safe in our being and there is ultimately no long-term threat.  But I cannot help but be concerned with seeing, in this immediate reality timeframe, what appears to be a police state slowly roll in. 

A bit of a shift perhaps into a different perspective: I think maybe deeper in my spirit is a greater understanding; that they (tptb) will try this, they will try that... but they will not necessarily succeed.  I think that they may not succeed because what they are actually trying to control, the infinite part of the human Spirit, will reveal itself in a way so as to truncate the plans of control; though even as I have encouragement in my own spirit at present to be positive in this regard, I cannot foresee the specific ways in which this would happen.

If someone wants to create a peaceful demonstration they have to aquire a permit from the city  authorities.  Without a permit the police has the right to arrest the partakers of the demonstration.

Well, if you say so.

PhiConcept wrote:

If you are moderate, worry free and at the same time aware of your surroundings then you won't run into situations that involve authorities.

With all due respect, that is a horrendously short-sighted statement.

Quite the contrary visavis.  I meant to present my statement in a general form and the formula, if applied towards activities that put a person at risk of opposing authorities, will work perfectly to avoid unnecessary conflict.

If you are moderate, worry free and at the same time aware of your surroundings then you won't run into situations that involve authorities.

With all due respect, that is a horrendously short-sighted statement.

At 6:05 I thought the lady said it was already or had been permitted, I can't make it out properly.

The second video was quite disturbing.  The policeman probably took whatever was said to him, personally and lost his cool.  It tends to happen more often now adays and the best solution to not get into such situations is to be a moderate, non resistant against authorities in any situation and worry free of all the paranoic (MIS)(DIS) information that surrounds us.  If you are moderate, worry free and at the same time aware of your surroundings then you won't run into situations that involve authorities.

Peace, PhiConcept.

second one:
http://www.wndu.com/videoplus/headlines … d=9794147#

The rights of Americans slowly being erroded:

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/m … mp;forum=1

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/m … mp;forum=1

I don't know if any of you caught this, but you can hear Kerry on the tape saying, "No, no, that's all right--let me answer his question" when the police begin wrestling with the guy.  Of course, Kerry then lets it all happen.  You can't hear him saying, "Leave that man alone!--it's all right, I'll answer his question" after the wrestling begins.

I'm sure that senator Kerry has no power over the authorities when an arrest is being conducted in front of him in public.  The oddity of the situation, however, illustrates the powers or (nodes) as montalk has mentioned in another thread, that govern an agenda of the American government.

The guy asked for it in broad daylight, but his 'crazyness' has definately influenced some people who witnessed the whole incident.

Edit: As much as I dislike Henry Makow's views on a lot of things, he has an interesting write-up on the idea of this incident being a psy-op.

Either way the taser issue just underscores how totalitarian things have become.   We are now at a place where people must immediately obey all commands from the authorities, otherwise they will be electrocuted.  That is not the kind of world I want to live in.

Kerry made an empty claim --  as the kid was being arrested -- that he was willing to answer the question.   He had no intention of giving a straight answer.   He was asked this same question on TV a few years ago, go here to see his answer.

This kid probably just found out recently that both Presidential candidates belonged to the same German Nazi death-cult which has taken over the American government, and was trying to use this opportunity to get some answers.    That's hardly an "obsession with secret societies" as you characterize it.    If anything it was an extremely appropriate question; he just should have approached the situation with more maturity and self-control.