This brings together a lot of ideas I've been thinking about. The basic quality of information is that it is neutral; you can transmit any kind of information. It is also local, that is, limited by the speed of light.

Resonance as a determinate of personal value (good word to describe it, Siri Arc; Tesla used it to describe something similar) is the similarity of response to energy by 2 or more systems. It appears to be the same thing Montalk means when he uses the term frequency resonance vibration (FRV). It also appears to be the same thing quantum mechanics calls quantum entanglement. 2 or more systems do not "send messages" to each other; they resonate (are entangled) such that they express the same values (measurements). This is not limited by time or space.

So what does this have to do with spirituality? Montalk mentioned how the Casseopeans messages became corrupted when the "receiver" changed her FRV. This appears to happen repeatedly with channelers; they get apparently good "information", get lots of people listening to them (participating in the observation of the effect) and then start putting out garbage.

I suggest that the Casseopean channeling was not information sent to the receiver but that the receiver was, at the start of the channeling, similar enough to the Casseopeans (whatever they are) to produce the same information as they have themselves. The involvement of other people with different "resonances" (FRVs) changed future information to something other than what the Casseopeans would have "sent".

Old stuff with a new label? She got "bad vibes" so the channel closed, right? Not exactly; if this is quantum entanglement there is a possibility of correcting the "bad vibes" using something called "quantum erasure".

In a physical experiment involving quantum effects, such as interference patterns produced by supposedly solid particles, the quantum effects can be destroyed by observation (collapsing the waveform) at a point before the quantum interactions occur. The effects can be restored by quantum erasure; usually involving a device which makes the information which would collapse the waveform unavailable to any possible observer.

So how does this apply to channeling? For prevention of "waveform collapse" it would mean that the identity of the channel must _never_ be revealed. Ever. Even after the channeling is ended; quantum effects are not limited by time. Nor can there be direct questioning by parties who are not originally involved; this may reveal enough to identify the channel.

I typed a long paragraph about quantum erasure, but upon consideration I really don't know if it is possible when the "entangled particles" are human beings. Can we erase information that has been observed? Do we even want to, when this may be part of spiritual development? Further suggestions, ideas and possibilities would be greatly appreciated.