Is that true?  What about people who are abducted -- do they all consent?  Some are abducted as young children, from what I read in many places.

Can the beef steer claim its power and tell the farmer that no thank you he won't be food for humans -- and make the farmer vanish?  I don't believe so.

They can't touch your spirit.  I like to believe that and still do.  But for sure they can touch your body.

But we are not our bodies, we are not our thoughts or our minds, that is the illusion.

The farmer will  still harvest the beef, but from now on, no soul with the beef, we are awakening. The farmer finally realises, beef without soul, is just animal flesh. Farmer - leave the planet now. Otherwise we will have no choice but to uncreate you. The party is over.

Piss off. Go away in jerky movements. Do what you want, but you do not want to be around when we all wake up.

I suggest you leave, now. While the going is good. Just go.

Illusionists, leave the stage, the real show is about to begin.

...Taking this back to the alien debate, the greatest call of us would be to say "Hey, I forgive you...but please, we don't need your help. We don't need your technology, we don't need you to save us. I've already saved myself, and so have countless others upon Earth. Your power is null and void upon our planet. We ask you to leave in peace." And there seriously would be nothing they could do. None. All the fear and confusion that surrounds the alien presence upon our planet is immediately dispelled once you realize our inherent power as discerning and responsible spiritual beings, once we realize they're given alot more power and fear than they deserve...once we realize they are here in extremely small numbers.
F.E.A.R = False Evidence Appearing Real. (Thanks Gary Busey!)

Is that true?  What about people who are abducted -- do they all consent?  Some are abducted as young children, from what I read in many places.

Can the beef steer claim its power and tell the farmer that no thank you he won't be food for humans -- and make the farmer vanish?  I don't believe so.

They can't touch your spirit.  I like to believe that and still do.  But for sure they can touch your body.

I had never heard Dr. Jacobs speak before, and was disappointed that his entire presentation consisted of interesting, but ultimately unimportant, anecdotal stories from his various abductee clients.   

Based on what I was able to gather and observe, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any groundbreaking new material from this author.   Kinda in the same way I wouldn't expect any groundbreaking new material from Colin Andrews, if you catch my drift.

I also saw Maurice Cotterell, who was far more interesting and stated publicly that he is not going to be disclosing all his new ideas, because he's been spoken to about it, and has decided that he prefers waking up alive in the mornings.

I'm thinking maybe it's something like copyright/plagiarism where general ideas can be disseminated by any number of authors but the exact wording is their intellectual property. One thing's for certain: controversy over personality and specialness being bestowed upon one person is likely to overshadow the content of the material itself.

I wonder though where the line should be drawn. Let's say the message was given to one hundred people. Then the typical protest might be "Why am I not one of these hundred? What makes them so damn special?" or 4400 or 144,000 or whatever. Just 1 is pretty extreme though. Would have been better to announce that this is a message that should be evident to all who discern with their minds and listen with their hearts, that 1 may be doing now what others have, could, should, and probably will be doing.

". . . if it were given to many people, there would be dissension and misunderstanding, and people would have different versions or interpretations of what they have received."

Hmm. . . I guess we are in a pickle then, since we already know from history that when a revelation is given to one person, it too results in misunderstanding and people having different interpretations.

....... morphic resonance turns all the monkeys into believers or non-believers by time.

As clarity:

The Monkey doesn’t believe anything.

She Receives a Notion

Then, from a place of Personal Power: The Willingness And Ability To Act

She Does.

I have no problem whatsoever accepting that a message was delivered to only one man from the Allies.  As they state, they are physical beings in the Greater Community.  So when this popped up in Allies I, I didn't blink an eye.  But God, the creator... now that's something else. 

Of course, in reading it, it seems to be a message from God as given to the Allies, as given to Summer, as given to us.  That's a bit different, I suppose.  But I will say that the introduction offered absolutely nothing new, and seemed to repeat itself over and over.  Maybe the full book would say something different.

But... something doesn't feel right. When a "higher" being says "I choose a specific person for my messages" then there's possibility of that "chosen one" being ridiculed, also having some followers, putting name/logo/flag to this message either by himself or by followers, seperating people as believers/non-believers, thus protecting this message from "non-believers" etc etc. And just as Siri wrote, morphic resonance turns all the monkeys into believers or non-believers by time.

And Simultaneous Invention

That monkey, acting as a transducer, Receives the notion to wash her spud in that stream over there.......

Pretty soon, other monkeys in other zones are also enjoying dirt free yams.

When asked if they had visited the first monkeys website or read the book, ‘Clean Spuds For Better Living’, they replied: ‘No, The notion just came to me’ - Or: ‘I saw Herb washing his and it seemed like a good idea.......’

~~~~~~~   ~~~   ~

Recall a couple o’ Notions from Lazaris:

Cause and effect is a linear perspective - A deeper Understanding is:

Resonant Causation

The risk is between corruption of a single message being interpreted differently by different messengers, and accusations of guruism if the message is kept pure by dissemination through a single messenger.

If anyone has a pipeline to anything, they better be tapped into something pure and be careful not to corrupt what comes through. What the case is may be determined by the quality of the material. We know of examples where some delusional egomaniac claims to be the only source of salvation. Fortunately the material they generate is baloney. The question is whether there could ever be a pure message delivered through a single honest messenger.

If we're talking about a fourth density STO group of alien observers, which is what the Allies basically show themselves to be, then it makes sense they would be given a single appropriate receiver to disseminate their package of knowledge. Even in offices, a single message is given to a single messenger to deliver to avoid confusing the recipient. To say that Marshall happens to be the receiver for that group does not deny other STO groups sending their knowledge packets to other receivers, nor does it deny the ability of people to tap into a more universal higher source to essentially derive the same concepts, sources like their higher selves or even the "Unseen Ones" which in this case are sixth density STO. I think it depends on the limitations of the source and the specificity of the message.

Regarding the New Message, the claim is that this particular message from God was sent only through Marshall. Does that mean no one else can receive communications from God? I doubt that's what it implies. Personally, I question the claim and don't really pay attention to that part of the material. If the rest has good, accurate, timely insights then okay, that part I appreciate. In my view, the personalities should always be secondary to the material content.

Yeah, there is always risk of ego corruption and source hoarding as time goes on. The Cassiopaean material is a good example of that. It's tough when a person is not only responsible for putting out info, but also be a leader to a group of seekers interested in the material. The seekers may put personality ahead of knowledge and turn the leader into a cult figure. Some leaders take the temptation and play guru, others get distraught at this and give up to sink back into anonymity, and others are somehow wise and strong enough to be good and wise leaders.

If someone claims they are the only source of something, then that will be proven if they are the only ones putting out those ideas. If so, most of the time the ideas are unique because they are subjective garbage no one else cared to make up, but occasionally they are unique because they tap into a new body of unrealized truths.