This reminds me of the threads about "Insider", the member of the ruling elite willing to divulge information.  Anyone else see similarities?

http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=2222

http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=2499

First of all, why would any elite write and disseminate such a thing?  Not saying they wouldn't, but I'm about 85-90% sure they wouldn't.  If it was written because "we" are making progress against "them," was this progress we were making back in 1999 and does it still apply today?  Are we worse off now, and if so why would this appear now and not back then, when we were making progress if it really were to discourage us?  If we're making progress now it would seem like they should write a new letter.

I suppose it could have been written as a sort of internal memo, what someone on their side wished they could say so instead they email to all their elite pals and it finally leaked out 7 years later.  It makes its first appearance in the conspiracy-oriented side of the Internet, which proves nothing, because they couldn't exactly print it in the NY TImes, and the conspiracy-minded folks are they target audience anyway.  If it were written by one of us, it would of course show up on conspiracy sites first.  So the fact its on conspiracy sites doesn't prove anything either way.

Overall, it seems like the author is writing from a limited perspective of the overall conspiracy, how big it really is.  Not that I know all, but a few times the author seems to think it's mostly an American/European thing.  I'll go through and quote some interesting bits regarding the author's perspective and parts that support my case that the author is conservative, and probably Christian.

We are told that all governments are compromised, but then the implication seems to be that China's accusation was not under their control.  He (assuming the author's gender) doesn't say "we had China make this accusation to give the impression they are a separate entity when they are not" but instead answers China's accusation.

This is one of several assumptions the author makes that the reader is a traditional conservative.  He does identify the left-right debate as a phony dichotomy, but the assumption still is that the reader will most likely be of the traditional conservative mindset that Clinton and the liberals are steering the country into the control of the UN. 

Not that we, as NRers, are always right, but I think we're all on the same page that there is "nothing new under the sun" as far as conspiracy goes.  The author seems to view global control as a newer phenomenon.

Isn't this the truth!

Yes indeed.

Again, the assumption is that resistance to the NWO agenda comes from the right.  I would say he doesn't mention how the WTO protesters in Seattle were made to look bad, but I think that happened just after the letter was written and I can't think of anyting equivalent on the left before then.

Like the militia quote above, Christians and the NRA are portrayed as opponents of the agenda which are made to lake stupid.  This appeals to people who saw Clinton as a godless globalist advancing the NWO/UN's agenda to take over, and take away their guns.  Today, I would say the NRA and big-time Christianity (the public Pat Robertson types that merge religion and politics) are part of the agenda and are NOT under attack.  The author then qualifies this with a statement just as is done against conservatives who are the real threat to the agenda, this can be done to liberals by conservatives if they become a threat.  No examples of liberals as threats to the agenda are given (still) - this may just be a product of when it was written by an actual elite, or it could reflect on the author's identity, your call.

As an aside, this is just stupid.  Of course if you're going to have a movie set in a galaxy far, far away the dialog will be in English (or the language of whatever country filmed the movie) because otherwise you would have to create an entirely new language from scratch, complete with its own grammar, and have subtitles throughout.  It would make sense if Americans were making a movie entirely in, say, Germany, that you could film the movie in English and audiences would know that the characters would be speaking the words we're hearing in English, in German.  Of course, an American movie with scenes in the U.S. and in Germany ought to use German dialog for the scenes in Germany, with subtitles. 

Could something they didn't want us to see receive so much promotion, if they will have what they want in the whole affair?

So very true!

This got me thinking about something I hadn't really considered, relating to the "sexing up" of the youth discussed here often (12 y/o girls are expected to dress like sluts!  even younger girls!).  Perhaps exposing in such a big way the sexual antics of the president, and specifically using oral sex and not vaginal coitus, serves an agenda with the youth.  There was this big debate caused by the incident over whether oral sex constituted sex or not.  Perhaps, combined with having the kids dress like sluts, the idea is to get kids to think casually of oral sex, so start having that at 11 or 12, and having regular sex earlier too, as a means of control early on.  I mean I already thought the agenda was to sexualize the youth, but I hadn't considered that Lewinsky and the president figured into it, I hadn't thought that the president's actions would influence the youth, but being the topic and how it was covered and how it trivialized oral sex, I can see how it could be related now.

Really now!  The author seems to think that the effort to remove the president was against the elite's will!  The House did in fact impeach, that means that the elite did not control more than half of the House?!  It also implies that those who supported impeachment & removal (conservatives and Christians) are not controlled by the elites.  I think this statement is the strongest condemnation of the letter's authenticity.

I know little about Milosevic and Kosovo, and how it all relates, so won't comment on all that, but Hussein was resisting the global agenda?  Entirely possible, but the general opinion here and elsehwere is that he played his part too, it was all an act and Hussein was just as controlled as our president.

"Some of you ON THE RIGHT have thought you could stop us...."

True.  I think that any act to start or inflame war is a war crime.

I don't know much about Mandela, is this true?  All I've known is that he opposed apartheid and was jailed by an unjust government.  If he was into bombs and such my opinion of him just plummeted.  Maybe I'll just stick with Gandhi.

This seems to contradict his earlier statement that Hussein opposed their agenda.

Why would you even say this unless you didn't really control all nations?  It seems like from the author's perspective, China & Russia were independent of the elites, and threats to them, until they were brought under control, instead of having been under their control from the beginning.

Would this be the mark of the beast?

--------

Hope this wasn't too long, and hope my off-topic quotes and comments didn't detract from my analysis.  Like I said, this may be for real but I highly, highly doubt it.  If it is real, it would be from a rather non-elite elite.  The real elites wouldn't write this to begin with, and I just don't think the author was writing from a full perspective. 

Anyone else have any thoughts?  Notice more inconsistencies, or notice points which contradict my position?

I've had timeline shifts on my mind quite a bit lately, and I remember how the Nexus 7 documents talk about how '99 was really a red-letter year for such events.  Is this just another pathetic attempt from those annoying NWO bastards to steer us toward one of the preferred streams they still have emanating back from 1999?  I think the one we're on now still has some great potential due to how comically bad it seems to be right now!  '99 couldn't hold a candle to this!  We have a really big 5-year anniversary coming up this fall and they still haven't achieved "total control"?

http://www.rense.com/general71/bankers.htm

I personally agree with  Ted Twietmeyer's comment (see bottom of that page) who says

"There is only one good reason why such a letter would be circulated - because as a collective force all of us ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE and are derailling their plans. These emails are used to create fear of them and boldly show they have great power - but all they show is that THEY are those who are afraid. Does anyone still remember what happened to King Louie and Marie Antoinette? When the masses are pushed too far, those ruling them fear for their very lives regardless of any technology, ideology or dogma of the day. And that day is quickly approaching for the NWO."

I believe the time has come to reveal to you some of the perplexities you have faced in recent decades. It is well for you to understand some of these things so that you might know how to behave in the New Order now taking shape on the earth. We want you to be able to become fully involved and integrated into our new society. After all, this is for your best interest if you will do.

Full letter: http://www.arcticbeacon.com/15-May-2006.html