Slight mistake from Stuie there, Ken Livingston is not the Lord Mayor of London, he is the Mayor but someone else is the Lord Mayor and has a more ceremonial role.

Nice they mention that the driver was drunk - even though recently it was proven that he wasn't drunk.  d'oh.

But never mind I guess...

Diana Probe Finds No Evidence of Foul Play

LONDON - An official British inquiry into the 1997 death of Princess Diana in a high-speed car crash has found no evidence of foul play, a newspaper reported Monday.

The Daily Mail said the interim report, to be published in May by former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens, will dismiss conspiracy theories about the deaths of Diana, her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, and their chauffeur, Henri Paul, in a Paris tunnel.

Those theories include an allegation that  Prince Charles was plotting to kill his former wife by staging a car accident. Fayed's father, Mohammed al Fayed, who owns Harrods department store in London, has said he suspects not only Charles, but also his father, Prince Philip.

The two-year investigation by 10 detectives will say that even a skilled racing driver would have had difficulty controlling the Mercedes carrying Diana as it hurtled through the Pont d'Alma tunnel in Paris, the Daily Mail reported. The newspaper cited "French judicial sources" at one point in its story but did not identify them further.

An official French inquiry concluded that Paul was drunk when he left the Ritz hotel with the couple and bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, who was seriously injured in the crash.

France's highest court dropped manslaughter charges in 2002 against nine photographers who pursued Diana's car before it crashed or who took photos at the site.

French officials have said all traffic cameras on the road that Diana's car took, and within the tunnel, were not working the night of the crash.

But Monday's Daily Express newspaper challenged that finding, saying a woman was caught speeding by a camera in the Pont d'Alma tunnel moments before Diana's crash.  [note:  So which version is it then?]

A Metropolitan Police spokesman declined to comment about the Daily Mail report, saying the investigation was still under way and no date has been set for the interim report to be completed and given to the coroner.   The official spoke on condition of anonymity, as the police officials always do as a matter of policy.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060306/ap_ … estigation

When the report is "officially" released, I'm sure it will have the same conclusions.     Nevermind all the Brotherhood symbolism surrounding the location and circumstances of her death, just like JFK.   oh well.   Stuie will be very disappointed indeed.  He was so sure Chuckles was going down for this one.  Huh. Wonder what happened?

I also suspect Alex Jones (just happens to be the only person ever to break into the grove and get away with reporting it) and Rense of pushing mostly truth with the disinfo enough to lead one away from the ultimate truth.

Indeed.  It's because they lack any sort of spiritual component.  There's no Bigger Picture perspective on it all.  It's all gloom and doom, all the time with them.  They keep pummeling the public with the same old rants, year in and year out.  It never changes.   Even David Icke who supposedly had his big awakening turned around and went back to spouting the same old same old, and didn't begin incorporating what he'd learned into the way that he goes about doing things.  I wish them all well, as there's truth to be found in their material for those who are just beginning to wake up, but for those of us who are already past the beginning stages, those authors don't really serve a purpose anymore.  We have to keep moving forward.......don't stop............don't linger.........keep moving.   Progress, not stagnation. 

Ahh, but the true powers that be don't need to do that.  That's what the low end spooks do.    Black unmarked cars, tapped phones, black helicopters, collecting names and addresses, "red list blue list"....all low rung.   I realize some people - many people - take them seriously, but, really, there's no need.  People with real power - and I mean of a hyperdimensional nature, just to clarify - don't hover over your house in a heli and collect your address from a website.    hehe

I read an interview online...and I am sorry, the name of the person doing the interview escapes me,sorry...with credo mutwa, an  african shaman that david icke is friends with. credo said in the interview that diana called him and told him she had to see him, because she knew that the royal family were reptilian. she was killed shortly after that. credo claims she was killed because she was going to reveal their secret.

But surley Di was "bloodline" too
I sometimes wonder if Icke was  used by TPTB or allowed to push his reptoid them just as a diversion. Who knows?
Its the ones that get killed of like Joe Vialls and others who may be nearer the mark.
I also suspect Alex Jones (just happens to be the only person ever to break into the grove and get away with reporting it) and Rense of pushing mostly truth with the disinfo enough to lead one away from the ultimate truth.
If i were a member of the TPTB i would certainly employ agents who act as truth revealers with huge web sites  collect the names and addys of all those who visit the web sites

like Earl Spencer and Tony Blair say there is no evidence of a conspiracy, what does
that make you think? If Diana had been your sister would you not be determined to find
out what happened? If you were Prime Minister when such a famous and much loved
Princess had been killed, would you not insist that the truth be established? So why
don’t they? Diana’s relationship with her brother was less than harmonious to say the
least. When you know the background, Earl Spencer’s famous speech at her funeral can
be seen as a diatribe of hypocrisy So was his bitter condemnation of the media, in a
statement after her death outside his home in Cape Town, a statement which, like Al
Fayed’s, fueled the belief that the paparazzi were to blame for the crash. Christine
Fitzgerald said of him:
“Charles Spencer is a sh it, major sh it. He’s quite a spiteful little shit, too. When Diana was
going through the trauma and really needed a new home, he said to her: ‘You’re not bringing
your shit down to me and mine.’ He wouldn’t even give her one of the houses. He’s not a
powerful man at all. He knows he’s sniffing around something dangerous and powerful and
so he’s attracted to it. Satanism goes on on the Spencer estate. Diana knew about it.”
Diana had a profound affect on millions of people as we saw after her death and they
did not know the half of what she had to suffer after the Windsors sank their fangs. In
many ways Diana was a mirror of Marilyn Monroe, used by the establishment and then
cast aside and murdered. Marilyn had affairs with President Kennedy and, it seems, his
brother, Bobby, and when she became dangerous and surplus to requirements she was
killed because of what she knew. In another of those remarkable examples of
synchronicity there are many ‘coincidences’ that connect her life and Diana’s. They
were both born on the first of the month and died at the age of 36 in August. They both
married on the 29th of the month to men twelve years older. Marilyn called herself the
Queen of Diamonds and Diana the Queen of Hearts. And both were the subject of the
Elton John song, Candle In The Wind, which he sang at Diana’s funeral. Since Christine
Fitzgerald first spoke to me the threat to destroy her business has been implemented.
Suddenly the phone stopped ringing and when I met her again she was seeing as many
clients in a week as she had been in a day. This is unexplainable when you consider she
is one of Britain’s most gifted and effective healers working in the centre of London.
Unexplainable, that is, unless you know the story. But she told me she is determined the
truth shall be known, whatever the authorities seek to do to her: “I don’t want a war, I
just want an end to the bullshit” , as she puts it. Looking back on Diana’s life and their
conversations together, she says:
“Poor cow, she was in a house where no-one gave a damn and it’s a terrible state of
affairs. She was all alone in a nest of vipers. I used to just patch her up. She just found me
and just came to me. I made her wait for a fortnight until I checked it out. They used to say
that I was giving her anger therapy. I didn’t. I used to just listen to her, take it all in, and
think Jesus Christ! But I didn’t think they would kill her. I can’t believe that this information
461
is so close to home and yet they are still managing to keep it at bay. My room is the truth
room and its a real place of safety and I don’t judge anyone on their sh it, and that’s why I
haven’t spoken about any of this in the past. She was as screwed up as anyone, you
know, and if you are going to tell the truth, you have to tell the whole truth. She wasn’t
crazy, she was mentally and physically abused, I feel, from a little girl. Her father was a
nasty piece of work and her stepmother (Raine), too.
“The Royal Family were very afraid. She would have taken the public away from them, she
would have taken the world from them gradually. They recognised her worth and fed off
her in a psychic vampire way for a long time. All she wanted was to get married and have
children you know, bless her little heart. She wanted to live out what she had never had.
The world would have come to rights with Diana because, as f*cked up as she was, she
was a light being and wherever she went she manifested love. It was amazing. The sad
thing was that she didn’t know she was doing that and she needed proof of her worth and
she was looking in the wrong quarters for that. But when she tried to break away, we went
out and did normal things. She did kung fu with my husband for five years. She wanted to
be normal, to link arms and walk down the street. She knew where her heart lay. She really
and truly did amazing things.”
Diana said she could not believe how cold the Windsors were and the public had a
graphic example of this in the days after her death. They stayed out of sight at Balmoral
in Scotland while the people mourned Diana in their tens of millions with an
unprecedented explosion of grief. Only pressure from the public through the media
forced the Queen, kicking and screaming, to make a cold, emotionless and pathetic
‘tribute’ to Diana on television the night before the funeral. Cold is a word constantly
used about the Queen, Philip, and Charles, and that’s the mental and emotional profile
of the Brotherhood and its networks. Bill Cooper said that the initiates that he met in his
work for US Naval Intelligence had “No conscience, no morals, no regrets, no feelings,
no emotion” . This is precisely the same character profile as the Windsors and,
according to all the people I have met who have encountered them, the character profile
of the reptilians of the lower fourth dimension. There is a reason for that, of course.
The people have been hoodwinked for thousands of years. Hoodwinked about their
history, hoodwinked about who they really are and the true nature of life. Hoodwinked
about the true background and Agenda of those they have allowed to rule them. How
apt, therefore, that this word should also derive from Freemasonry. Dr. Albert MacKey,
the 33rd degree Freemason and foremost Freemason historian of the 19th century,
defined the term ‘hoodwinked’ in his Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry as: A symbol of
secrecy, silence and darkness, in which the mysteries of our art should be preserved
from the unhallowed gaze of the profane.
The human race has indeed been hoodwinked.

of children. She said it is the pure essence of the pre-pubescent the reptiles want. “If you
looked at where all the castles are built and where there are a lot of street children in the
Third World, they’re galloping it at the moment. They’re pulling the kids in en masse
now.”  She said the reptiles want the children’s life essence because they can’t continue to
manifest without that pure energy. “The contaminated essence of us adults is not worth
anything to them” , she said. “All the rituals, the knives, and sodomy, its that easy for these
people to snatch a piece of your soul.”  Christine also spoke about the sex rituals and orgies
involving the Windsors. The very word orgy comes from the Greek, orgia, meaning ‘secret
worship’ and relates to the sexual rites of the ancient mystery religions. Christine said:
“There used to be an elect circle who took part in ritual orgies at Buckingham Palace. This was
told to me by one of the participants. They were all couples. The lights used to go out at a
certain time and they all swapped round and did their things. You know about the butler ringing
the bell at six o’clock in the morning so that everyone goes back to their bed? These people
are nasty pieces of work, sweetheart, these people are nasty. Nothing you can think of can
ever be as nasty as they really are. Diana used to say that if the world knew what they were
really like, they wouldn’t want them, but I knew that. My chin was on the couch now, hearing
about all these orgies at the palace. Just the laugh that these serious people who are going on
like butter wouldn’t melt up their jacksy and they are carrying on like that. But the sex thing is a
big part of their rituals because it’s kundalini energy, see, which is the core, our generator. The
orgies stopped because one of the couples died and they had an odd number and they didn’t
want to bring in anyone else. So even that was ritual. Everything about them is ritual... all that
heraldry, all that pomp and ceremony. Negative energy gets drawn to negative energy.”
Many of the Queen’s Ladies in Waiting have told Christine Fitzgerald about Prince
Philip and his affairs. “The royal family has got lots of black babies all over the world” ,
she says. The recovered mind-slave Brice Taylor tells in her book, Thanks For The
Memories, how she was forced to have sex with Philip and Charles. It is not without
reason that the former British Intelligence officer, Peter Wright, said in his controversial
book, Spycatcher, that “The palace had enjoyed several centuries of scandal burying.”
Christine said that another controversial book, The Royals, by the American author
Kitty Kelly was true, but “She’s left out a lot of stuff, she’s been quite kind” . She’s not
kidding as you will soon appreciate. Christine told me about other members of the royal
clan including Prince Philip’s uncle, Lord Mountbatten, another Satanist. She said:
“Lord Mountbatten was a big shit, too. It was him who f*cked up Charles and got him
on the nasty road.”  So this is the family which hooked an unsuspecting 19-year-old and
used her, in Diana’s words, as a “brood mare”  to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer
genes. But it was more than that. Much more.
Only a few weeks before this book went to press, and months after Christine gave
me her information in England, I was contacted by a friend in the United States who
was deprogramming a very high level mind controlled slave from Project Monarch. He
believes her to be the highest ranked woman in the Satanic hierarchy in the United
454
States and she was one of only three Mother Goddesses in the world. This is Arizona
Wilder, formerly Jennifer Greene. At the time my friend and Arizona had no idea what
Christine Fitzgerald had said. Arizona had been programmed and trained since
childhood to become a Mother Goddess who conducted Satanic rituals at the highest
levels of the Brotherhood all over the world. She described to my friend the inside of
many secret and underground facilities that he has personally seen. What she described
was accurate every time. He also checked her story with other contacts and the truth of
her memories was continually confirmed. What she told my friend, and later told me on
audio and video tape, supports the information supplied by other slaves and by
Christine Fitzgerald about the Windsors and their true nature. Arizona said that she
officiated at Satanic rituals at Glamis Castle in Tayside, Scotland, the childhood home
of the Queen Mother, who still owns the property, and also at Balmoral, the Queen’s
Scottish residence. The Brotherhood obsession with Scotland, she said, was because
there are many entrances there into the inner-Earth where the physical reptilians live.
Glamis Castle is built on the site of an 11th century royal hunting lodge and the present
building dates from around 1687. It is mentioned in the ‘Shakespeare’ story of Macbeth.
Arizona said that the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles and Princess Anne are
present at the rituals and so is Charles’ girlfriend, Camilla Parker-Bowles. Doesn’t it all
now start to make sense?
She said that during the sacrificial rituals the Queen wears a cloak of gold fabric
inlaid with rubies and black onyx. The Queen and Charles have their own ritual goblets,
inlaid with precious stones signifying their Illuminati-Brotherhood rank. The Mother
Goddess says that the Queen makes cruel remarks about lesser initiates, but is afraid of
the man code-named ‘Pindar’ (the Marquis de Libeaux) who is higher than her in the
Satanic hierarchy. This also supports a claim made to me by another recovered slave who
said she had seen the Queen physically beaten by someone above her in Satanic rank.
Pindar, apparently, bears a resemblance to Prince Charles and Arizona says that Pindar is
Charles’ real father. She said that the sacrificial victims used in the rituals at Glamis
Castle are mostly under five years of age and the ceremonies are guarded by members of
Scotland’s Black Watch. She also confirmed that Lord Mountbatten was a paedophile
and that the Windsors are reptilians in human form. Her interview with me was taped, as
were the ones with Christine Fitzgerald, and copies are now at various addresses. The
video interview with Arizona is available and details are at the back of the book. I stress
that this Mother Goddess had no idea what Christine Fitzgerald had told me and yet their
statements match again and again. Arizona says that Diana definitely knew that the
Windsors were shape-shifting reptilians and Diana’s comments to Christine Fitzgerald
support this. Apparently, reptilians have been seen to shape-shift during sleep. Here is a
summary of just some of what Arizona said about the royal family:
“¢ The Queen Mother: She’s cold, cold, cold, a nasty person. None of her cohorts even
trusted her. They have named an altar (mind control programme) after her. They call it the
Black Queen. I have seen her sacrifice people. I remember her pushing a knife into
455
someone s rectum the night that two boys were sacrificed. One was 13 and the other 18.
You need to forget that the Queen Mother appears to be a frail old woman. When she
shape-shifts into a reptilian she becomes very tall and strong. Some of them are so strong
they can rip out a heart and they all grow by several feet when they shape-shift.”  (Exactly
what the lady who saw Edward Heath said, among many others.)
“¢ The Queen: “I have seen her sacrifice people and eat their flesh and drink their blood.
One time she got so excited with blood lust that she didn’t cut the victim’s throat from left to
right in the normal ritual, she just went crazy, stabbing and ripping at the flesh after she’d
shape-shifted into a reptilian. When she shape-shifts she has a long reptile face, almost
like a beak, and she’s an off-white colour. The Queen Mother looks basically the same, but
there are differences. (This description fits many depictions of the gods and ‘bird gods’ of
ancient Egypt and elsewhere.) She also has like bumps on her head and her eyes are very
frightening. She’s very aggressive.”
“¢ Prince Charles: “I’ve seen him shap-shift into a reptilian and do all the things the Queen
does. I have seen him sacrifice children. There is a lot of rivalry between them for who gets
to eat what part of the body and who gets to absorb the victim’s last breath and steal their
soul. I have also seen Andrew participate and I have seen Prince Philip and Charles’ sister
(Anne) at the rituals, but they didn’t participate when I was there. When Andrew shapeshifts,
he looks more like one of the lizards. The royals are some of the worst, OK, as far
as enjoying the killing, enjoying the sacrifice, and eating the flesh, they’re some of the
worst of all of them. They don’t care who sees them at the rituals, they are what they are,
they show it outright. They don’t care if you see it. Who are you going to tell, who is going
to believe you? They feel that it is their birth-right and they love it. They love it.”
Given the evidence I have presented in this chapter about the background to Diana’s
murder, I was not surprised to hear this Mother Goddess recall the following about
Mohamed Al Fayed:
“I saw Mohammed Al Fayed at a ritual at the Mothers of Darkness castle in Belgium in the
1980s. The Queen and the Queen Mother were also there. The Queen Mother was talking
to him and he was looking around as if he didn’t believe this sort of thing went on. It was
on December 24th at the ritual of the old king and the new king. They didn’t let him in to
see the worst of it. It was kind of like, ‘let’s introduce him into this’. But he would have seen
a baby being born and introduced as the new king and the sacrifice of an old man. The
Queen Mother was there, the Queen, Pindar, Rothschilds, a lot of people I don’t know and
a guy named Tony Blair. He was being groomed because my understanding of it was that
people are picked out and groomed for certain positions. And to be considered for those
positions you have to accept the reality and the necessity and the sovereignty of the
Illuminati, and that the reptilians run the show. Tony Blair’s attitude was like ‘I belong here’.
Dodi Fayed’s father seemed bothered by it, but not Tony Blair. I remember seeing him
talking to the royals about something. I have seen Blair, Al Fayed and the Royal Family at
rituals at Balmoral as well.”
456
Once you know this astonishing background, the why, who and how of Diana’s
murder become crystal clear. They were all in it together and still are. Diana’s murder
had been planned for a long time, probably from birth, and it was in the 1980s, around
the time Al Fayed was at the Mother of Darkness castle with the royal family and Tony
Blair, that the flaming torch symbol was placed on top of the Pont de L’Alma tunnel.
Arizona said that Diana was a product of the multiple personality disorder programme,
which she said would have started before she was five. She said Diana was also three
months pregnant when she died. Diana would probably not have known this, she said,
because the techniques the Brotherhood use often mean that the women continue to
menstruate for some months before they are officially confirmed to be pregnant.
Arizona said that when she, herself, was artificially impregnated in a mind controlled
state with Pindar’s sperm, she menstruated for three months before she was told by a
doctor that she was more than three months pregnant. It could have been Pindar’s child
and not Dodi Fayed’s, Arizona suggested. “That is a really powerful sacrifice”  she said,
“to sacrifice a pregnant woman” . If Diana was, as appears highly likely, a product of the
mind control programme, those who plotted her murder could have ensured all that they
required to play out their ritual to perfection. She would have accepted the invitation
from Al Fayed at the right time, fallen for Dodi Fayed, agreed to go to Paris for the
night and so on. She could also have been, like Arizona, impregnated artificially and
have no recollection of it. Arizona says that she knows that Diana was impregnated with
Pindar’s sperm in this way to conceive her son William, the blond-haired, blue-eyed
baby born on the summer solstice. And she is in no doubt that Diana was a ‘multiple’.
As she said:
“The things that she did with her eyes, like the eye rolling, is very, very common in
multiples. Sometimes she’d be very shy and then suddenly she’s blossoming and she’s
really social. These are the different altars (programmes) coming out, someone’s shy,
someone’s not shy, someone’s angry, someone’s not angry. Then there was the weight
gain and the weight loss. The bulimia and the cutting herself are all signs of a multiple.
Some are told that if you feel bad about yourself or you remember something, cut yourself.
To me it was real obvious with Diana. Someone with this stuff just doesn’t announce to the
world that something’s wrong, They spend their lives trying to hide it. ‘I was out grocery
shopping’, or ‘I was out clothes shopping’, ‘I was taking a walk’, whatever, but you weren’t.”
The recovered mind-slave Brice Taylor confirms that Diana was a ‘multiple’ in her
book, Thanks For The Memories, and she says that William and Harry are also. I think
Dodi was another, thus making it child’s play to make he and Diana ‘fall in love’. The
symbolism of Osiris, Isis and Horus, in the Pont de UAlma tunnel that night was also
confirmed by Arizona. “Diana was Isis, Dodi Fayed was Osiris, and the child was
Horus. I don’t think it symbolised the birth of a child so much as the birth of an age -
the Age of Horus which begins by the year 2,000. This means the New World Order, the
Age of Horus, the terrible child.”  She said that the foetus would have been divided
457
among certain high ranking leaders of the Brotherhood/ Illuminati and consumed in
ritual. She said that from her long experience of the rituals, she was sure that parts of
Diana’s body would have been consumed also. Again I ask, is her body even on the
island at Althorp Park? It makes you wonder what Tony Blair and the Royals were
doing when they came together at Balmoral immediately after Diana’s death. Another
part of the ritual was that Diana was blond-haired and blue-eyed. Cathy O’Brien is the
same, so is Arizona although she had dyed her hair to break that spell when I met her.
She said that even when the Elite sacrifice cats they are blond-haired and blue-eyed.
There is something about that genetic structure which is fundamental to them and this is
the blood they need to survive in this dimension. At least most of the Monarch slaves
have blond hair and blue eyes. “There were no blue eyes on this planet until the
extraterrestrials came” , Arizona said.
Diana told Christine Fitzgerald in 1989 that they were going to kill her: “It sounded
outlandish at the time” , Christine said, “because she had the boys and they were little
and I thought, no, they need her to bring the boys up.”  But there were to be many
indications that Diana was indeed in danger from the Windsors and the Brotherhood in
general. In the late 1980s with her marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana
was having a relationship with her personal detective, Barry Mannakee, but he died in a
motorcycle ‘accident’ in 1988. By 1990, with the Gulf War threatening, Diana was
having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt. One day, about this time, she went
rushing into Christine’s healing centre in London in a terrible state. Christine
remembers:
“She was crying hysterically and I said ‘What’s the matter?’ You know it was dog’s died
stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the door. I gave her rescue
remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell me what’s going on.
‘I can’t believe it, I can’t believe it, they killed him, they killed him’ she sobbed. I said: ‘Who
did they kill?’ She told me about her affair with the detective (Barry Mannakee) and how he
was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible accident. But now
she knows the Royal Family killed him because Prince Charles’ senior detective had just
told her that if she didn’t cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him. He told her she
should not think that she was indispensable, either.”
Officially, Barry Mannakee died in a ‘road crash’. How dangerous the roads seem to
be if the royals don’t like you. Christine said that Diana was very much in love with
Mannakee and she had visited his grave regularly. Diana had, apparently, been unaware
of his death at the time until she was being driven with Prince Charles to the airport to
fly to the Cannes Film Festival. He waited until she was about to get out of the car in
front of waiting photographers and he said:
“Oh, by the way, I got word from the Protection Unit yesterday that poor Barry
Mannakee was killed. Some sort of motorcycle accident. Terrible shame, isn’t it?”
Diana burst into tears, but Charles said sarcastically: “Let’s go darling, your press
458
awaits you.” 61 I would emphasise again that the confirmation that Mannakee was
murdered, and the personal threat to Diana, came from Prince Charles’ senior detective,
according to the Princess. Would he be making statements and threats to her like that
without the approval of Prince Charles? Of course not. In 1998 in the Independent
Television documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, James Hewitt said that he too had
been warned to stop seeing Diana or the consequences would not be pleasant. He said:
“The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the
situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to
continue the relationship.”
He said that other warnings came from Diana’s personal police protection officers,
the Royal Household, and a member of the Royal Family, whom he would not name:
“The (member of the Royal Family) said your relationship is known about. It is not
supported, we cannot be responsible for your safety and security, and suggest that you
curtail it forthwith.”
James Hewitt was further quoted in the London Times about these threats and his
comments supported completely the story Diana had told Christine Fitzgerald. Hewitt said
that his clearest warning came when he was told that he would suffer the same fate as
Barry Mannakee.62 Does anyone still believe that the Windsors and their networks were not
involved in the murder of Princess Diana? Or that they had prior knowledge and played an
active role in the decision to assassinate the mother of William and Harry? According to
reports in the United States, Susan Barrantes, the mother of Sarah ‘Fergie’ Ferguson, had
been telling friends that she thought Diana had been murdered in the weeks before she was
decapitated in a mysterious car crash in Argentina on September 19th 1998.63 Confidential
mail for Diana was delivered to Christine Fitzgerald and this included packages from a
former member of the elite SAS who was concerned for Diana’s safety. He was warning
her of what was going on behind her back.”  Half of M16 were on Diana’s side too you
know” , Christine said. One day a client, who had involvement with the security agencies,
saw some of these packages being delivered. Christine described what followed:
“She said I’m really worried for you, you don’t know what you’re getting involved in here.
Diana’s basically mad, she’ll drop you in it, she will hang you out to dry, you’ll end up dead,
your kids will end up dead, your cats, your business will be ruined. I couldn’t believe how
she was carrying on. She was so full of hate. Diana came in the next day and I gave her
the mail. I said not everyone who bows to you has your best interests at heart. I told her
what happened and she went purple with rage. When she died, everybody came in and
said ‘They bumped her off didn’t they?’ But that client was the only one who was outraged
at the suggestion. I was checked out by M16, my phones were tapped, my house was
burgled, the royal family kept a big check on me while I was dealing with Diana.”
459
Christine and her contacts have no doubt about what happened in Paris: “She was
bumped off, she was left to die at the roadside. Those responsible were above the elite
of the army” , she said. “It was not the ‘secret squirrels’ (British Intelligence)” , she
understands, “it was above that” . She said that “Mohamed Al Fayed ‘in his tortured
little sense’ wants to be part of the reptilian power because ‘he likes all that’.”  Christine
believes that Diana’s romance with Dodi was engineered. She said:
“Diana fell in love quite easily and he’s a master of the smile. She was unfortunate in her
love affairs because she rescued others in her own distress. So the men she went for were
all emotional cripples because she was a healer, too. Most people who went with Diana
used her and I think Dodi did also. He would have used her for his ego, the contacts, and
his dad. The Royal Family killed her for her light energy, especially when she was
pregnant. I don’t believe she was as badly injured as they say. If they checked her body
they would see that the scar the surgeons made starts at her pubis and goes right up to
her throat. They’ve even taken her thymus gland, the way we make interstellar
communication. I know from the best sources that she was pregnant and they took the
baby. Pieces of that foetus will have been delivered everywhere. They can make babies
from the cells. Parts of her body will have been used in their rituals as well. Diana was
always having Kensington Palace swept for bugs, but they had Dodi bugged and they
knew exactly what was going on. This was not the first time she thought she was pregnant
and this nearly happened before, but she wasn’t pregnant. That was with Hewitt.”
Christine Fitzgerald shared the most intimate details of Diana’s life and knew her in
ways, and at levels, that very few others did. The incredible revelations of the
Windsors’ treatment of Diana over so many years, the threats made to her by Prince
Charles’ personal detective, the ritual sacrifices and the confirmation that they were
responsible for the murder of Barry Mannakee, cannot be allowed to pass by. There
must be a campaign to press the Windsors to face these matters and for Al Fayed,
Trevor Rees-Jones, Earl Spencer, and the others I have named, to answer the questions
that have to be addressed. Power must be stripped from the Windsors, their royal
dynasty dismantled, and their crimes against humanity publicly exposed. More than
that, however, those in the political, security, and medical professions, who are also
involved, must be equally exposed. The Royal Family, Earl Spencer, and the British
Prime Minister, Tony Blair, have all dismissed claims that Diana was murdered and
called for such suggestions to cease ‘for the sake of the boys’. The questions must not
be allowed to be ignored or another Brotherhood assassination will have been
achieved while those responsible go free. Earl Spencer went to the extent of issuing a
statement on behalf of the Spencer family in February 1998 in which he asked: “Is
there any good in all this speculation? I ask that because there is clearly a lot of harm
in it. All we, her family, ask is that Diana’s memory be respected, and that sensational
speculation be left out of the public arena, where it undermines our aims to come to
terms with her loss” . When you see the evidence presented in this chapter while people

men, soldiers, terrorism) can play out in the public arena. Because of this it appears that
the world is controlled and dominated by male energy - it’s a ‘mans world’, but in truth
it is not a world dominated by the male, it is a world dominated by extremes of male
and female. I am not talking men and women here, I mean male and female energy
which can be expressed by both men or women. For instance, the Brotherhood
manipulators like Henry Kissinger never see a gun fired in anger. They are not out there
physically fighting (male energy) in the wars they engineer. They are manipulating
events from the shadows and behind our backs, a trait of the negative female energy and
symbolised by the story of the Trojan Horse. The female energy is also the creative
force and you can create negatively or positively. The Brotherhood are highly
malevolent, but very creative. For this reason, in esoteric law and symbolism, the
female energy (Diana, Semiramis, Isis, Barati, Britannia) is given different names for its
different expressions. The Egyptians portrayed Isis in white in her positive mode and in
black to symbolise her negative aspect. In the same way we have the symbolism of
Diana (positive female) and Hecate (negative female). They are simply different
symbolic names for different manifestations of the female energy. The Satanists of the
Brotherhood work with the Hecate energy and that is why they worship this deity. They
are actually worshipping the extreme negative female energy and it is for this reason
that in Satanism the high priestess is considered as important as the priest, if not more
so. At that Elite centre for Satanism in Belgium, the Castle of Darkness I mentioned in
an earlier chapter, the top position in the hierarchy is not known as the king, but the
Queen Mother. So in the Pont de L’Alma Tunnel the positive female energy (love,
compassion, intuition), symbolised by Diana, was eliminated by the negative female
energy (manipulation, ritual death), symbolised by Hecate and the crossroads.
The death of Dodi Fayed was also crucial to the Satanic symbolism. Given the
circumstances of his death, it is quite a coincidence that his real name, Emad El Din, is
Arabic for ‘Pillar of Faith’. Dodi was a nickname he was given as a toddler by his family.
This, too, is interesting. It is very close to Dido and in fact ‘Dido’ was the nickname he
gave to Diana. Dido in Greek mythology was the legendary founder and queen of
Carthage (an Aryan people connected to the Phoenicians) and she was the daughter of
Belus, king of the Phoenician city of Tyre. When Dido’s husband was killed by her
brother, Pygmalion, she fled with her followers to North Africa where she purchased
Carthage from the native ruler, Larbus. He later threatened Dido with war unless she
married him, but instead she killed herself. But the most likely symbols for Dodi Fayed’s
death can be found in his birthplace, Egypt. The Brotherhood are obsessed with the
symbolism in ancient Egypt of the Osiris-Horus-Isis trinity (Nimrod-Tammuz-Semiramis)
which is expressed in Christianity as father, son, and holy ghost. Among many things, it
symbolises the male and female energies coming together to create a third force, new life.
To the Egyptians, and therefore the Brotherhood, the son of God was Horus. He was born
to Isis after her husband, Osiris, had been murdered by Set. She gathered together 14 parts
of his mutilated body, but she could not find the penis. So she created a penis and
impregnated herself to conceive Horus, the Sun God - Sun King, Horus was Osiris
446
reborn. In Paris, part of this ritual was played out again. The car passed the golden-tipped
Egyptian obelisk, the penis of Osiris, in the Place de la Concorde, and inside the vehicle
were Diana (another name for Isis) and the Egyptian, Dodi Fayed, representing Osiris. I
have heard from many sources that Diana was pregnant. Her foetus symbolised Horus,
the Sun King. In ancient Egypt, they said that Osiris had to die before Horus could come
in. This will sound amazing to most people, but if you study the unbelievable obsession
these people have with ritual and symbolism it makes perfect sense. Diana may not even
have realized she was pregnant. It could have been the foetus they were removing on the
operating table in Paris while they “battled to save her”  for hours after she was clinically
dead. I have heard suggestions that the cells from the foetus are being used to clone
babies from this genetic mix. These will be ‘Sun gods’ according to Brotherhood ritual.
The cloning of humans has been possible for a long time, as the cloning of sheep at the
Roslyn Institute near Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland has clearly shown. The Brotherhood’s
secret science is always far in advance of anything allowed into the public domain and
because of this the public find it impossible to believe what the Brotherhood can do with
drugs and technology. So it is with their mind control techniques and I am sure that both
Diana and Dodi had been under the influence of mind manipulation over many weeks to
ensure the ritual happened as required. For goodness sake, a stage hypnotist can take
over the mind of someone from the audience. Just think what is possible for those mind
manipulators at the global cutting edge.
The Pont de L’Alma is one of the most sacred places in the world to the Brotherhood
and, as with the street plans in all their key cities, they made sure the site was full of
appropriate symbolism: the bridge, the underground chamber, the crossroads and the
name. Since my own spiritual awakening in 19901 have been guided by my
subconscious intuition to many Earth power centres. Often I have not been aware of this
at the time and only with hindsight have I seen how, on a non-conscious level, I had
been drawn to a major vortex point on the magnetic grid system and often to those of
particular importance to the Brotherhood. In 1994 I was on holiday with my family near
the Normandy coast in France and we decided to visit Paris. It was a long drive, but we
had never seen the city before. We drove to Versailles outside Paris and took the train
from there to the station at the Eiffel Tower. It was a hot, humid, and sweaty day, and
the area was packed with people and heavy with traffic. This combination was so
unpleasant that we decided not to stay very long before taking the train back to
Versailles, but first we went for a short walk. We crossed the River Seine by a
footbridge near the Eiffel Tower and walked a hundred yards or so alongside the river
bank on the far side before finding a seat to rest. After sitting there for about ten
minutes we walked over the nearby road bridge and back to the railway station to leave
the city. We were in the place for little more than an hour and that is all I had
experienced of Paris until I went back to research Diana’s death for this book.
When I returned to Paris I had quite a shock because I found that seat again where
we rested in 1994. It is on top of the Pont de L’Alma tunnel very close to the 13th pillar
where the car crashed! Also, near that seat above the mouth of the tunnel is a large
447
depiction of a lighted torch (see picture section). This, of course, is the most obvious
Brotherhood signature of them all and after President Kennedy’s ritual killing, the
Freemasons erected an obelisk in Dealey Plaza with a lighted torch at the top. Another
flame was placed on his grave. The one on the Pont de UAlma Tunnel stands on a black
pentagram and there isn’t a more powerful Satanic symbol than that. It is supposed to
be a ‘Flame of Liberty’ (a copy of the flame held by the Statue of Liberty) to
commemorate those who died in the Second World War, but it’s location has,
predictably, ensured that it has become a shrine to Diana. One newspaper report said
that the French authorities were considering a permanent memorial to Diana at the Pont
de L’Alma - a continuation of the 13th pillar above the ground! I can’t think of anything
more sick or more symbolic than that. The last I heard they planned to open a vegetable
garden to commemorate her death and they were going to pull down a building to make
way for it. The garden is an area of Paris that Diana is never known to have visited and
she had no recorded passion for growing vegetables. So what goes on? Well, first I bet
you’ll find that the vegetable garden will be on another ancient site of some kind, and
most importantly such an inadequate and bizarre memorial will ensure that the flame
above the tunnel will now remain the public shrine to Diana.
The Flame of Liberty was placed on the tunnel entrance in 1987 and I am certain the
assassination of Diana at that spot was planned well before then. It is quite conceivable,
given the Brotherhood’s long term planning and meticulous attention to ritual and
symbolic detail, that it was planned for decades. Definitely before the sacrificial lamb
was hooked into the Windsor web to marry Charles. It was Brotherhood symbolism
which decided the location of their wedding at St Paul’s Cathedral. St Paul’s, with its
vast dome, was designed by Sir Christopher Wren, the high Brotherhood initiate. It’s
design is mirrored by both the Congress Building in Washington DC and by the
Pantheon in Paris. Brutus, the Trojan who became first king of the Britons in about
1,1O3BC, was the man who founded ‘New Troy’, known today as London. He was
another who worshipped the goddess Diana and he is reported to have erected a temple
to her on what is now called Ludgate Hill on the site of a former stone circle.58 This is
in the heart of the City of London financial district, that centre of Brotherhood control,
and today on this site of Diana worship you will find... St Paul’s Cathedral. In Paris, the
Notre Dame (Our Lady) Cathedral is on an ancient site of Diana worship and the
ambulance carrying the princess’s body passed Notre Dame during that bizarre journey
to hospital. So Diana was married on an ancient sacred site to the goddess Diana and
she died on the site of an ancient sacrificial chamber of the goddess Diana. She was also
hunted and used by the Windsors to produce heirs and Diana was the ancient goddess of
hunting, fertility and childbirth.
When Prince Charles and Diana’s sisters went to Paris to escort her body back to
London, the coffin was draped in the royal standard, the flag of the Windsors which is
covered with the Sun symbol, the lion. Not the flag of the country, you’ll note, but the
flag of the Windsors. Another strange coincidence happened at the Hammersmith
Mortuary in London. As her coffin arrived, the one carrying Dodi was leaving and they
448
apparently crossed at the entrance. What are the statistical chances of that when both
made such very different journeys from Paris? Dodi, we were told, had to be buried
within 24 hours of his death according to Muslim religious law and there was a mad rush
by his father to meet the deadline. There was no autopsy on his body, a quick external
examination was considered enough.
At this point, Diana’s brother, Charles, Earl Spencer, then 33, came on the scene after
flying back from his home in Cape Town, South Africa. When Earl Spencer, the Queen’s
god-son, made his maiden speech in the House of Lords in 1993, he chose a rather
strange subject, Satanism On The Spencer’s Althorp Estate In Northamptonshire. He
acknowledged that it was going on, but he said he was doing all he could to eradicate it.
What a remarkable topic to introduce in your first speech in the Houses of Parliament.
The Brotherhood Mother Goddess, Arizona Wilder, reports seeing Earl Spencer and his
father at some of the sacrificial rituals she conducted. It was Earl Spencer who
announced that, despite her wishes, Diana’s body would not be interred in the family
tomb at the local village church at Great Brington near the estate. Earl Spencer said he
wanted to avoid swamping the village with sightseers and he had decided that Diana
would be buried on a man-made island in the centre of a lake on the Althorp Estate. The
lake is called The Oval and when looked at from above, the island looks like a dot within
a circle, a symbol of the Sun. The flame in a circle is on Kennedy’s grave. Also on the
island, Spencer has placed the Brotherhood symbol of a burning flame and at one stage,
Mohamed Al Fayed said he was going to put an ‘eternal flame’ to Diana and Dodi on the
roof of Harrods to mark the first anniversary of their deaths in August 1998.59
Islands are very much part of the legends of the goddess Diana and she was supposed
to have been born on the island of Delos in the Aegean Sea. It is also known as the Island
of the Dead after Hecate, the patroness of the ‘infernal arts’, the negative aspect of the
Diana goddess energy. Diana is another name for Brito-Martis, the goddess of Crete
which was colonised and developed by the Phoenicians who created the Minoan
civilisation. Brito-Martis was actually a Phoenician goddess, according to Greek and
Roman legend. She was the divine ‘daughter’ of Phoinix (correctly spelt) the King of
Phoenicia, and was armed, like Diana, with weapons for the chase. Legend says that
Brito-Martis (Diana) sailed from Phoenicia to Argos in Southern Greece and onto Crete
where she was pursued by her unwelcome admirer, Minos. She escaped by retreating to
the sea and sailed to Aegina, an island in the Aegean where stands the temple of Artemis
or Diana. Islands and Diana are very much connected in the legends. Earl Spencer put
Diana’s grave among trees on the island and this is classic symbolism because the
ancients used to worship the goddess Diana in the tree groves and this was said to be her
most sacred place. Sir James Frazer describes in his book, The Golden Bough, the Diana
rite known as the King of the Wood at Lake Nemi (again a lake is a big part of Diana
legend). The Lady of the Lake is also Brotherhood symbolism. Frazer says that on the
northern shore of Lake Nemi, under the cliffs on which the modern village of Nemi, near
Aricia, is perched, was the sacred grove and sanctuary of Diana Nemorensis, or Diana of
the Wood, the goddess of hunting. Lake Nemi is the most celebrated shrine to the
449
goddess Diana and here, says Frazer, there grew a tree around which the figure of a
priest would be seen with a sword. A candidate for the priesthood in the cult of Diana
could only succeed by killing the present incumbent and he would only keep the job
until someone in turn killed him. The post carried the title of king - King of the Wood -
and a long line of priest-kings who served Diana met a violent end. So the goddess
Diana is associated with islands and a lake and was worshipped among the trees. And
Earl Spencer puts his sister’s grave among the trees on an island in a lake.
Then there is the strange tale of the black swans. In June 1998, Earl Spencer gave an
interview for BBC Television in which he told of a dream he claimed to have had between
the crash in Paris and Diana’s funeral. In the dream, he said, he had been told to put four
black swans on the lake around the island. When he called his estate manager the next
morning and asked him where he would find four black swans, the manager is supposed
to have said: “You’ve heard then?” . “Heard what?” , Spencer claims to have asked.
“We’ve been offered four black swans” , the estate manager replied. Maybe this is true,
but, in my view, this story has more to do with flying pigs than flying swans. Black swans
are profound occult symbols used in rituals and were the seal of the infamous Satanist,
Catherine de Medici, who, Arizona Wilder says, was a previous incarnation of the Queen
Mother. They appear most obviously in the ballet, Swan Lake, when the black swan,
symbolising the negative female energy, kills the white swan, symbolising the positive. In
other words, Hecate kills Diana. What better symbolism can you have of Swan Lake than
black swans on a lake, as at Althorp? A swan is a derogatory term in Druidism. Project
Monarch slaves who rebel are told that they will be “Turned into swans”  and Diana, of
course, rebelled against the Windsors. The number of swans also fits here. Monarch
programming includes a term called The Four Gates of Heaven and four could also
symbolise the four phases of the Moon. Earl Spencer has established a ‘temple’ to Diana
at the side of the lake. A number of the stately homes of the British aristocracy have
temples or areas featuring the goddess Diana, among them Blenheim Palace home of the
Marlboroughs and Chatsworth House, headquarters of the Cavendish’s, the Dukes of
Devonshire, and both families are related to the Spencers. Diana was carried in a
leadAined coffin and lead is the metal associated in ritual magic with Saturn, possibly
from where we get the name Satan. The colour associated with Saturn and Satanism is
black. Diana was also led to her death across the two key Brotherhood days of Saturn-day
and Sun-day. The 15th-century Italian philosopher-doctor from Horence, Marsiho Ficino,
produced talismans for protection and the one for Saturn was engraved on pure lead. It
was said to protect the wearer against death by assassination and ambush and protected
women in childbirth. On Diana’s lead coffin during the funeral were lilies, the flower of
Lilith, another version of Hecate and a symbol of the bloodline. The lilies were chosen by
Earl Spencer, Diana’s brother. The lily was also sacred to Astarte, another Diana deity,
and it was used to symbolise the impregnation of the virgin Mary. The ‘blessed virgin’
Juno, ruler of August, was said to have conceived her saviour-son, Mars, on a magic lily.
The lily is symbolic of the reptilian bloodlines. In the year 656, the 10th Council of
Toledo officially made the day of Juno’s legendary conception of Mars into the
450
Christian Festival of the Mother of God, or Lady Day, insisting that it commemorated
Mary’s miraculous conception of Jesus with the aid of a lily.60 In France the people
knew Lady Day as Notre Dame de Mars. The symbolism of the lily with the pregnant
goddess giving birth to the saviour-god (as in Isis and Horus) is fascinating, given the
stories that Diana was pregnant at the time of her death and the way I have connected
this to the legend of Osiris, Isis and Horus.
There have also been questions about whether Diana is even buried on the island. In
the Summer of 1998, the Star magazine in the United States quoted an unnamed “senior
source”  at Buckingham Palace as saying she was secretly cremated and according to a
report in the Los Angeles Times some people in the village of Great Brington also don’t
believe she is buried on the island. I know these reports are true from my own sources.
One resident quoted by the LA Times said that the night her coffin was taken to Althorp
for burial, the village had been ‘invaded’ by the army, police and special forces units,
and all the villagers were hustled into their homes. She said that the crematorium at the
church was working late into the night. Betty Andrews, the former cook and
housekeeper at Althorp, is quoted by Star magazine as saying: “There’s a strange
feeling amongst the villagers that we may not be hearing the complete picture” .
While researching this book I was introduced to Christine Fitzgerald, a brilliant and
gifted healer, who was a close friend and confidant of Diana for nine years. Because of
Christine’s understanding of the esoteric, Diana was able to talk to her about matters
she would not dare to share with anyone else for fear of being dubbed crazy. It is clear
that Diana knew about the true nature of the royal family’s genetic history and the
reptilian control. Her nicknames for the Windsors were “the lizards”  and “the reptiles”
and she used to say in all seriousness: “They’re not human” . There is a very good
reason for Diana using this description of the Windsors. As her deprogramming
continued, Arizona Wilder remembered clearly a ritual she attended at Clarence House,
the Queen Mother’s home near to Buckingham Palace, in which Diana was shown who
the Windsors really are. It took place in the first seven days of July 1981, just before
Diana and Charles were married on the 29th. This period is the last seven days of the
cycle of the Oak Tree, according to esoteric law, and the ritual was called The
Awakening of the Bride. This is a ritual for all females of the 13 bloodlines who are
going to be in publicly high positions and marry reptilians to produce the new
generation of rulers. Arizona says that the Queen Mother, the Queen, Prince Philip,
Lady Fermoy, Diana’s father Earl Spencer, Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles
were all present when Diana was brought into the room. She was wearing a white gown
and a drug had been administered by Lady Fermoy. Diana was told that she should
consider her union with Prince Charles as only a means to produce heirs and nothing
else. Camilla Parker-Bowles was his consort, not her. Arizona says that Prince Philip
and the Queen Mother then shape-shifted into reptiles to show Diana who they really
were. ‘Diana was terrified, but quiet’, she said. Diana was told that if she ever revealed
the truth about them, she would be killed. (Remember the guy I mentioned who had a
call from Diana in the March before she died asking for his advice on how to reveal
451
information about the royals that would ‘shake the world’?) The Queen Mother told
Diana at the ritual that “all ears”  would be listening to everything she said and “all
eyes”  would forever be watching her. This is the classic ‘nowhere to run’ bind imposed
on all mind controlled slaves. Does anyone believe, therefore, that they would allow
Diana into the clutches of Mohamed Al Fayed if he was not under their control? The
ritual also involved the use of a golden penis (Osiris symbolism) which was used on
Diana to signify the ‘opening of the womb’. Arizona says it was of reptilian shape and
size and had needle-like protrusions designed to superficially puncture the walls of the
vagina and cause bleeding. Diana was told that after this ritual, she would never be
“honoured”  again by attending their rituals and she was not to ask questions about
them. Now do people understand why Diana suffered from bulimia and serious
emotional problems from the time she married Charles?
Diana told Christine Fitzgerald that the Queen Mother was the power behind the
Windsors, along with Prince Philip. But Philip was subordinate in the hierarchy to the
Queen Mother, Diana said. The Queen Mother is connected to a long list of
Brotherhood groups and societies and she is the head of the Inner Temple, the elite and
highly secret society for the upper levels of the legal profession on the ‘former’ Knights
Templar land at Temple Bar in London. It was the Queen Mother and her close friend,
Diana’s grandmother, Ruth Lady Fermoy, who manipulated Diana into the marriage
with Prince Charles. This is why Diana was given quarters at the Queen Mother’s
home, Clarence House, in the weeks before the wedding and she left from there to
marry Charles at St Paul’s Cathedral. “Diana used to tell me that the Queen Mother was
evil” , Christine Fitzgerald said, “She actually used that word, evil. She said she hated
the Queen Mother and the Queen Mother hated her.”  Most people in Britain will be
astonished to read this because the Queen Mother’s propaganda has turned her into the
nation’s favourite grandmother. “Oh yes, the Queen Mum, such a lovely, gentle, kind
old lady.”  But this woman is not what she is claimed to be. I can’t emphasise that
enough. During her time at Clarence House before the wedding, Diana says herself that
she was being given drugs like the anti-depressant, Valium, to treat her bulimia. And
what else were they giving her? “They drugged her” , Christine said “I’m sure of it, they
had her doped from the start.”  Christine had many conversations with Diana and she
opened her heart about her nightmare life with the Windsors. But Christine’s contacts
through her work have given her access to other sources with inside knowledge of the
British Royal Family, too. This was the first time she had talked publicly about her
experiences with Diana and what she knows of the reptilian agenda. She told me:
“The Queen Mother... now that’s a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot
older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn’t died for a long time, they
have just metamorphosised. It’s sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of
flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it’s lizard, because it’s cold-blooded,
it’s much easier for them to do Frankenstein shit than it is for us. The different bodies are
just different electrical vibrations and they have got that secret, they’ve got the secret of
452
the micro-currents, it’s so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the
bodies. These are the energies I work with when I’m healing. They know the vibration of life
and because they are cold-blooded, they are reptiles, they have no wish to make the Earth
the perfect harmony it could be, or to heal the Earth from the damage that’s been done. The
Earth’s been attacked for zeons by different extraterrestrials. It’s been like a football for so
long. This place was a bus stop for many different aliens. All these aliens, they could cope
with everything, including the noxious gases. They’re landing all the time and coming up
from the bowels of the Earth. They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when
they get out now through the electrical vibration, that life key I talked about. They can
manifest how they want to. All the real knowledge has been taken out and shredded and put
back in another way. The Queen Mother is “Chief Toad”  of this part of Europe and they have
people like her in each continent. Most people, the hangers on, don’t know, you know, about
the reptiles. They are just in awe of these people because they are so powerful.
“Bal moral is a very, very nasty place. That’s somewhere they want to dig underground.
They will find reptile fossils, it goes back that far. Don’t think of people like the Queen
Mother and Queen Victoria, as different people. Think of them as the same person which
after a while has had to replace their coat. When the flesh dies, that energy, while it’s
dying, will be immediately up someone else’s jacksy (backside). It’s very vampire, worse
than vampire. They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck you’re blood.
Fear is their food, they can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing. The key
is the vibrational current. At that vibrational current, they can manifest anything from
anything. Its like a holographic image. We are all minerals and water vibrating. This is all
an illusion we are living in. That’s the secret. You know when the monarchy’s faUen, it’s not
the end of it. They will manifest in another form. The reptiles have never been defeated
and this is the closest they have come to it. The reason they are so threatened today is
because the Earth is in such trouble and the mental power of people is returning. This is
their most frightening time, but this is not going to kill them. There are long centuries
before it’s over yet. The difference this time is that it’ll be more difficult for them and they
are going to have to settle for less and the Earth people are going to get more. But even
though these reptilian ones are fuckers, they are sad, pathetic beasts really, while
humanity is galloping towards light. They’re just pathetic lumps of nastiness who aren’t
going to win. I can’t talk about this everywhere because they would just go ‘Christine, get a
white coat, put it on backwards, get out’. But I want an end to the bullshit.”
I was astonished to hear someone else talking about these subjects, which I knew
from my own research to be true. She was not aware when she told me this of my own
research into reptilians. Christine Fitzgerald, thanks to her insider contacts and her
knowledge of metaphysics, had been able to grasp the biggest secret: that reptiles on
another dimension are controlling the world by working through physical bodies which
look human. And also that the Windsors are one of these reptilian bloodlines. Christine
also knew about the reptile Satanic rituals, the sexual rites and the widespread sacrifice

location you control is vital in such assassinations. President Kennedy’s body was
flown immediately out of Dallas to the Brotherhood-front, the Bethesda Naval Center
near Washington DC, for the post mortem. Here the president’s brain went missing (or
his look-alike’s did) and, as the US Assassination Records Review Board revealed, the
autopsy notes and the first draft of the post mortem were burned.
So who was behind Diana’s assassination? It is important to stress that those who
gave the order and those who did the deed would be very different. We are looking at a
Brotherhood here, a spider’s web, and while the order will have come from the spider or
spiders in the centre, it will have been mostly carried out by the flies. It is highly unlikely
that it would have been done directly by British Intelligence because that would be too
obvious. Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put
them at arms length from the incident and to allow them to ‘plausibly deny’ that they
were responsible. For instance, there is considerable evidence that President Kennedy
was shot by members of an elite rifle team within a renegade unit of French Intelligence
called the OAS, or at least that they were involved in the plot. Olof Palme, the
Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the
orders of, among others, George Bush. But the killing was carried out by members of
BOSS, the South African Intelligence agency (see .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free).
The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13 (that number
again) and British Intelligence has a long and sick history of political and economic
assassinations. British Intelligence consists of MIS (Military Intelligence 5) which is
responsible officially for domestic security, and M16 which deals with overseas matters.
MIS announced in 1988 that they do not assassinate people. No, they get others to do it
for them. This pathetic denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MIS agent,
David Shayler, that M16 had organised a plot to assassinate Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi.
The attempt had failed because the bomb was put under the wrong car. Shayler was head
of the ‘Libyan Desk’ at MIS and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the
Foreign Secretary, who is so far out of his depth he needs a frogman’s suit, said that he
had been assured that no such event took place. Oh, that’s OK then. The attorney-general
banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana - Secrets of the
Crash, and later Shayler was arrested and jailed in Paris awaiting extradition to London.
Why do that if what he is saying is such nonsense? Because, of course, he’s right. By the
way, the oath of allegiance by British Intelligence officers is not to the government, but
to the monarch. It is the same with Members of Parliament and the military. Ultimately
the Queen is their boss under the law, although, in truth, their boss is whoever controls
the Queen because even she is not at the top of the pile.
The type of organisation most likely to have been involved in Diana’s death, at the
operational level is typified by the Pinay Circle or ‘Le Cerde’ which has a number of
British establishment figures in its ranks. Le Cerde is an offshoot of the even more elite
Safari Club, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the Director during
the 1970s of the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage. It was the
Safari Club which arranged for the alliance between a French Intelligence front-
439
company called Group Bull and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be
surprised to know, the world’s biggest manufacturer of landmines. This alliance
supplied landmines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a
consortium of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in
Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in
countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in arms trading and
supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cerde, named after the
French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who attended the first Bilderberg Meeting in
Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cerde included the
Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le
Cerde membership has included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at M16; William
Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence;
Stefano Della Chiaie, a leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti,
the former Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the
man who gave the Mafia official protection; Silva Munoz, a former minister for the
fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the Elite secret society, Opus Dei; Franz Josef
Strauss, the German defence minister; and Monsignor Brunello, an agent to the Vatican.
In America, one of the Le Cerde fronts is the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in
Washington. Look at the potential for such an organisation to be the coordinating force
between countless different agencies and countries all to achieve a common aim. The
Safari Club-Le Cerde network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary
to arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn,
the assassination to be carried out, and those involved to get away with it. What was
that John Stalker said? “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of a British
woman?”  It is also interesting that Simon Regan in his book, Who Killed Diana?, says
that it was Le Cerde which destablised the Gough Whitlam government in Australia in
1975. The Queen was certainly involved in that, too. As I explained earlier, it was her
Governor of Australia, John Kerr, who removed Whitlam in the end. If the Windsors
and Le Cerde worked together to bring down an elected Australian Government, why
could they not have worked together to eliminate Diana?
Paris, with its immense Brotherhood associations going back centuries, has long
been a favourite location for their murders and plots. Amschel Rothschild from the
English branch of the family, was murdered there in his hotel room in 1996 in what
some claim to have been part of one of the inter-Brotherhood wars which have littered
their history. For an organisation like Le Cerde, or its many mirrors in London, it would
have been easy to place its people in the right places. Mohamed Al Fayed’s security
operation is awash with former members of elite British military and police units who
know the consequences of saying “No”  to the Brotherhood, even if they don’t wish to
be involved. In the same way, these spider structures ensure that their people control the
inquiries into their assassinations, as they did most famously with Kennedy. Even
Mohamed Al Fayed’s personal investigation into Diana’s death was headed by Pierre
Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department
440
of French Police. This is the same organisation which is also responsible for the official
investigation. Al Fayed’s chief lawyer in Paris is a former French Justice Minister, and
in overall charge in London is John Macnamara, his head of security and a former Chief
Superintendent at the headquarters of London’s Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard. In
the Spring of 1998, Macnamara was part of a ‘sting’ operation involving the FBI, CIA
and possibly, the Israeli (Rothschild) Intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former
CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67-year-old American born in Austria. Le Winter
contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of
M16 and the CIA in Diana’s murder. He was asking $10 million and after a meeting
with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15,000. A further meeting was arranged
in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed over.
In the meantime, however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA.
Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on
Wednesday April 22nd, where with support from the Austrian police a combination of
FBI, CIA and possibly Mossad agents pounced on him. All this for an alleged hoaxer?
The story would have remained secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on
the Kurier newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le
Winter’s hotel room was searched, four documents, two of them in code, were found
and appeared to be genuine CIA documents. The CIA have since admitted tapping
Diana’s phone calls in, and to, America and passing the contents to British Intelligence.
Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Grolig’s story forced Al Fayed to admit that
it was true. So was Le Winter trapped by such an array of international security
personnel because he was selling a hoax to Al Fayed or because he was selling the
truth? Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident. Richard
Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s M16, gave evidence to the French inquiry into
Diana’s death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the Official
Secrets Act for trying to sell his memoirs. In August 1998 he was arrested again, at gun
point, in Paris at the request of the British Government who were concerned at his
association in that city with the MIS whistle-blower, David Shayler, who was also
arrested and jailed in Paris.54 Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in
charge of the ‘inquiry’, that Diana was murdered. According to a report on the BBC’s
news service, Ceefax, on August 28th 1998, he told the judge that Henri Paul was an
asset of British Intelligence and so was “One of the bodyguards” . Which one was not
named. Meanwhile Herve Stephan, a Brotherhood placeman, is doing all he can to hold
the line that it was an accident.
The most important question to ask when you are trying to identify those responsible
for a crime is: “Who benefits?”  As the Roman wnter, Seneca, said: “He who most
benefits from a crime is the one most likely to have committed it” . Well the Windsors
benefited magnificently. No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction
of the Monarchy’s credibility and public esteem with her actions and her knowledge of
their secrets. No longer is she there to bring her influence on the upbringing and attitudes
of the future king, Prince William and his brother Prince Harry. The Windsors now have
441
complete control of them, to mould them into their image. They couldn’t do that before
because Diana’s influence was too strong and I hope the memory of that will encourage
the princes to withstand the indoctrination. The way is now paved for Charles’ marriage
to Camilla Parker-Bowles without the complication of Diana and, of course, his royal
duty to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes, although as we shall see, William
might not be his child. Understandably, it has been suggested that Diana was killed
because of her campaign against landmines. This is not true, not directly anyway. The
landmine manufacturers have done very nicely from her campaign, because they make
far more money from clearing mines than they do making them. A mine costs about  £30
to produce, but at least  £3,000 to clear. Clearing all the mines around the world is
estimated at  £330 billion. No, the landmine manufacturers like Honeywell were not
against Diana’s campaign, they loved it for their own reasons. But what she showed very
clearly was the power she had to take an issue from the shadows and hurl it into the
public arena. The question could well have been: “What will she do next?” . And what
was it that Diana had to reveal, as she told my contact, that would “Shake the world” ?
Henry Kissinger, one of the greatest Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century, met
Diana a number of times and sickeningly attended her funeral. He said in an interview
after her death that: “She was politically and diplomatically uncontrollable” . That is
Kissinger-speak for “That’s one reason she was killed” . From the perspective of the
operational level of the Brotherhood pyramid, as with Kennedy, there were many reasons
why they wanted her dead. But, as I keep emphasising, that is only one level. At the top
are the Elite black magic adepts, the reptilian full bloods and crossbreeds. At the highest
level of the Brotherhood, Diana’s death, like Kennedy’s, was a ritual killing. It was long
planned for the effect it would have on the people and the magnetic field of the Earth,
and to symbolise the introduction of the New World Order. Don’t underestimate the
fantastic power of ritual and symbolism in affecting the human psyche and the planet’s
magnetic field. These people afe not obsessed with it for no reason.
The Brotherhood and Satanic symbolism surrounding Diana’s death is endless and to
understand the background to her ritual murder we must, once again, go back a very long
time. Diana was one of the greatest goddesses of the ancient world and she represented
the female energy also known as Barati, Britannia, Isis, Artemis, Aphrodite, all these
different names for the same energy. If you go back far enough, they symbolise the same
entity, also, Ninkharsag. Diana was known as a Moon goddess. One tribe of Elite
bloodlines who worshipped the goddess Diana were called the Sicambrian Franks who
can be traced from Troy (that name again), through Asia Minor, now Turkey, the
Caucasus Mountains (again) and up into Europe. They lived at one time in an area west
of the River Danube and settled in Germania, named by the Romans after the Scythian
‘genuine ones’ with their centre in Cologne. They also invaded parts of Roman-occupied
Gaul, the land which is now Belgium and northern France, from where the ‘noble’
families of Scotland were to come. It is from these Sicambrian Franks that we get the
name France. At the time of King Meroveus, who was named Guardian of the Franks in
448, this people became known as the Merovingians and Princess Diana, through the
442
Stuart bloodline, was related to them. Many seem to believe that the Merovingians are
descended from the bloodline of Jesus, but how they can be genetically descended from
a myth defeats me. This is a diversion to mislead. They are, however, an Elite bloodline
that goes back to the Aryan race in the ancient Middle and Near East and eventually goes
off planet. The Merovingians were the sorcerer kings who were noted for their esoteric
knowledge and magical powers which they inherited from the underground bloodline
streams of secret groups and initiations. Francio, the founder of the Franks, claimed to be
a descendant of Noah and his ancestors once resided in ancient Troy of wooden horse
fame. The French city of Troyes, where the Templars were officially formed, was named
by the Sicambrian Franks after their former home. The Iliad says that Troy was founded
by Dardanus, the son of the Greek god Zeus, who was depicted as both an eagle and a
serpent. Zeus was born in Arcadia in Sparta, it is said, and the Spartans migrated into
France. These are the bloodlines we are talking about here, not those of ‘Jesus’.
The city of Paris was established by the Sicambrian Franks in the 6th century after
they became known as the Merovingians. It was named after Prince Paris, the son of
King Priam of Troy. It was the relationship between Prince Paris and Helen of Sparta
which supposedly caused the Trojan War in which the Trojan Horse (infiltration) assured
victory for the Spartans. Both the Trojans and the Spartans were branches of the same
Aryan peoples and within them were the reptilian bloodlines. Paris in those days was
confined to an island in the River Seine which is now known as the Ile de la Cite or Isle
of the City. The Notre Dame Cathedral, built by the Templars on a site of former Diana
worship, stands on the Ile de la Cite today and this is where the Templar Grand Master,
Jacques de Molay, was roasted to death. The Merovingians established the city of Paris
on a major vortex point which is why the Notre Dame Cathedral is built on that spot.
Meroveus, the founder of the Merovingian dynasty, followed the goddess cult of Diana
and this is not surprising because the epicentre for Diana worship was at the famous
temple at Ephesus in Asia Minor, not far from the alleged site of Troy. The temple is
named as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Diana was known as Queen
of Heaven, just like Semiramis. Outside the original Paris - and now very much inside
the modern city - the Merovingians established an underground chamber for the worship
of the goddess Diana and for the blood rituals and human sacrifices to her. This site dates
back at least to 500-750 AD and it was here that kings in dispute over property would
settle the issue in combat. According to legend, anyone killed there goes straight to
Heaven and sits at the right hand of God. Now get this: The location today of this
underground sacrificial site for the goddess Diana is... the Pont de L’Alma tunnel!
The word pont relates to Pontifex, a Roman high priest, and it means passage or
bridge. Alma comes from Al-Mah, a Middle Eastern name for, wait for it... the Moon
goddess. So the Pont de UAlma translates as ‘Bridge of the Moon Goddess’ and the
adjoining Place de L’Alma is the ‘Place of the Moon Goddess’. And the Moon goddess
is Diana. It can also translate as ‘Bridge of the Soul’ and a ‘Maiden’ of the goddess
Diana was called an Al-mah! This is why Henri Paul was programmed to drive past the
turning to Dodi Fayed’s flat and head for the Pont de L’Alma tunnel. This is why the
443
emergency team kept her in the tunnel for so long instead of rushing her to hospital where
her life would have been saved. She wasn’t meant to be saved and they only moved her
when she was clinically dead, as the autopsy report confirmed. According to Brotherhood
Satanic ritual, Diana had to die in that underground chamber on the ancient sacrificial site
and it had to happen at night under the Moon in the goddess month of August, ruled
according to legend by the Roman version of Isis, Diana, etc: Juno Augusta. The Satanists
in the emergency team simply ensured that Diana would not leave the tunnel (sacrificial
chamber) alive. We are told she bled to death and, if this is correct, it was precisely in
accordance with their blood rites and sacrificial rites. But was the bleeding caused in the
way we are told, or by some other chemical means? We now know that Diana was
clinically dead about 12.45 am, yet she was taken to the La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital and
kept in the operating theatre for an hour and a half while the medical team, Professor
Bruno Riou, Professor Pierre Coriat, Professor Alain Pavie and Professor Jean Pierre
Benazat, cut open her chest and “battled to save her” . Save a woman who had already
been clinically dead for an hour and fifteen minutes when she arrived at the hospital?
When they had finished, the French Minister of the Interior, Jean-Pierre Chevenement,
decreed, according to his senior advisor, Sami Mani, that there would be strictly no
admittance to the room in which her body was laid out.55 Chevenement was one of several
‘VIPs’ who rushed to the tunnel and observed the medical operation at this former
sacrificial site.56 The Brotherhood Mother Goddess, Arizona Wilder, said that Guy de
Rothschild had talked about Diana’s death in early 1998 when he tried to reprogramme
her at a house in Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles. Rothschild was using a pseudonym, Dr
Barrington. He said that he was in the tunnel that night to “Steal Diana’s soul”  through the
‘evil eye’ hypnotic gaze the reptiles use at the point of death. I explained this earlier in
relation to Pindar. A contact in Denmark told me that during her last year of medical
studies at the Copenhagen University in 1983 she realised that severely mentally ill
patients were being used for experiments by being inseminated with genetically tampered
semen. The pregnancy, she said, was very painful and often unsuccessful. Sometimes the
patient died and the foetus was dissected in secrecy. She went on: “The doctors
conducting these experiments were professors, heads of departments, PhDs, the most
outstanding in their field. They had a kind of Brotherhood... many of them were psychic
and monkeyed with black magic. Incredible amounts of money were flowing to them.”  A
story that could be repeated thousands of times all over the world.
Another name for the goddess Diana is Hecate. One of the ancient ‘triads’ or
‘trinities’ was that of Diana, Luna and Hecate who were said to be three aspects of the
same female energy. It was called Diana on Earth, Luna in Heaven, and Hecate in Hell.
Hecate is one of the premier deities of Satanism and she is a version of Aphrodite and
Venus, different names for the same energy. After her husband’s death, Jackie Kennedy
travelled to the Greek island of Delos in the south west Aegean Sea, the legendary
birthplace of Diana and Apollo and the considered domain of Hecate, the goddess of the
‘infernal arts’. Delos is known for this reason as the Island of the Dead. Hecate was
portayed as both the virgin and the whore and crossroads are the sacred places of
444
Diana-Hecate. It is at crossroads that the witches and the Grand Masters and sorcerers of
Freemasonry perform their rituals. Crossroads are symbolic of the vortex points created
where ley lines cross. In ritual sex magic, the wearing of clothes of the opposite sex and
the performance of bi-sexual acts are called ‘Crossroad Rites’. The women involved
were called ‘dikes’. Crossroads are also places of human and animal sacrifice and Hecate
is known as a ‘sex and death goddess’ and the goddess of witchcraft and sorcery. At the
Pont de L’Alma, right at the spot where Diana died, the road that goes through the tunnel
is crossed on the surface by another road which leads onto the Pont de L’Alma Bridge. In
fact this spot is a maze of crossroads. And Diana died in the early morning of August
31st. Hecate’s Day in the Satanic calendar is August 13th, but under the Satanic law of
reverse symbolism and reverse numbers, Hecate’s day of sacrifice is... August 31st!!
So just look at the symbolism of this. Diana, named after the ancient Moon goddess,
was driven from the Ritz and through the Place de la Concorde where she passed the
3,200 year-old Egyptian obelisk brought to Paris from Luxor with it’s tip or pyramid
coloured bright gold symbolising the penis of Osiris. It was at this very point, a minute
from where Diana died, that Queen Marie Antoinette was beheaded at the guillotine
during the Brotherhood-engineered French Revolution, another symbolic blood sacrifice
of the female energy. Diana was then driven at speed to the Pont de UAlma tunnel, the
Bridge or Place of the Moon Goddess, where the car struck the 13th pillar, the
symbolism for which is simply enormous for obvious reasons and for others I’ll come to
later. Now she was left to die on the very site of an ancient underground sacrificial
chamber to the goddess Diana and bled to death according to Satanic ritual. She also
died at a crossroads with one road under the ground, the other above, and the crossroads
is the sacred place for the Satanic deity, Hecate, another aspect of the ‘Diana’ energy.
And it all happened on Hecate’s day for sacrifice, August 31st. Does anyone doubt that
this was a ritual murder? And I’ve not even nearly finished with the symbolism
surrounding her death. Remember what David Berkowitz, the Satanist serial killer in
New York known as the Son of Sam, wrote about those involved in the Satanic network:
“...Satanists (genuine ones) are peculiar people. They aren’t ignorant peasants or
semi-literate natives. Rather, their ranks are filled with doctors, lawyers, businessmen, and
basically highly responsible citizens... They are not a careless group who are apt to make
mistakes. But they are secretive and bonded together by a common need and desire to
mete out havoc on society. It was Aleister Crowley who said: ‘I want blasphemy, murder,
rape, revolution, anything bad’.” 57
It is worth emphasising again here the Satanists’ relationship with female energy.
The challenge we all face is to balance male and female energies and so enjoy the best
aspects of them and not the extremes. The Satanists, however, seek to express only the
extremes, thus creating disharmony and conflict. They use the malevolent, highly
negative expressions of the female energy (covert manipulation behind the scenes) to
create the events and circumstances which the extremes of the male energy (macho

Once the deed was done; the scapegoat was produced. The methods are so
predictable, but they keep working so why change them? The Lee Harvey Oswald,
Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray of the Diana assassination was the driver, Henri
Paul. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused public and media
attention in the days after the crash, it was announced that Paul was three to four
times over the French drink driving limit and that his blood contained traces of antidepressant
drugs, including Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of the infamous Prozac.
“The cause of the crash was simple,”  we were told. “The driver was drunk.”
Tampering with blood samples or creating alcohol in the blood is child’s play and so
is the insertion of tiny ‘balloons’ which release alcohol into the blood stream in
stages. There was certainly no sign before he drove away from the Ritz that he was
intoxicated to the extent, according to his blood tests, that he must have drunk the
equivalent of eight Scotches on an empty stomach. A behavioural psychologist on
the Independent Television documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, could find
no evidence that he was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but
there could be an explanation for this which I will come to shortly. Only two days
earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his pilot’s licence
and there was no sign of the alcohol abuse the post-crash propaganda claimed. Quite
the opposite. And there was another strange anomaly revealed by the ITV
documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henri Paul’s blood was found to contain
429
20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier
because the carbon monoxide content halves every four to five hours once exposure to
it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen. Debbie Davis of the Carbon Monoxide
Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henri Paul would not have
known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain.
Dr Alastair Hay, an expert on carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain
why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that should have been evident:
“I find it difficult to rational ise everything. A blood-carbon monoxide level of 20% and (a
high blood-alcohol level) suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction
time, certainly be someone who would be slowed up in the way he did things, would
probably also be somebody who was in some pain, but none of those things appear to be
evident from the pictures that we see of him. It is a bit of an enigma.” 47
There is a lot more to know about Henri Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told
the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts within the French and foreign intelligence
services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This is no surprise
because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men at the top hotels and the Ritz,
with its VIP clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing, would have been a
prime target. Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income. He earned about  £20-
25,000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at
about  £300 an hour. He had a string of bank accounts. There were two in a bank outside
Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near
the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and
four deposit accounts at the Caisse D’Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the
crash, sums of  £4,000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In
total he had  £122,000 (1.2 million francs) and no-one knows where it came from. Then
there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours between 7pm when he went
off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his mobile phone and told him to return to
the Ritz. His whereabouts in this period are a mystery. A very significant one.
To understand how the Brotherhood operates requires immensely detailed research
over a vast array of interconnecting subjects. Everything from ancient history, to
Satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earth’s magnetic grid, the power of the Sun, the
banking system, and mind control. The journalists who have produced the articles and
documentaries about the crash came to the subject cold and they can never uncover
the truth because they don’t understand what they are dealing with. Their vision of
possibility is limited by their indoctrinated view of reality. They can’t see, for
instance, that there are organisations within organisations which means that one force
can work through apparently unconnected agencies like British and French
Intelligence, the Paris police and medical services, and the inquiry investigating the
cause of the crash. I mean, you don’t have to search far for evidence of that. Look at
the Kennedy assassination for one. It is this lack of research of the big picture that
430
leads reporters like Martyn Gregory on the Dispatches programme to state categorically
that “there is not a shred of credible evidence to support the conspiracy theory”  and that
the suggestion of Prince Philip’s involvement was “ludicrous” . I wonder after reading the
evidence so far -and there is a great deal more to come - which you think is more
ludicrous: the idea of a plot to kill Diana or Martyn Gregory’s statement? It was an
unfortunate comment in a programme that produced some good information about Al
Fayed. Then there was the ‘investigation’ into the crash by John Stalker, the former
deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester, in the News Of The World newspaper, in
which he dismissed all idea that Diana was murdered. Ironically, Stalker claimed, quite
rightly, that he was the victim of a conspiracy to remove him from the police force after
he identified a policy by the Northern Ireland police, the RUC, to shoot people they
believed were terrorists and ask the questions later. This was the so-called shoot-to-kill
policy. Pushing aside every suggestion of a conspiracy to kill Diana, Stalker asked: “Why
would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?” 48 The naivety of
that statement is so breathtaking, I need a glass of water. At the same time, Stalker did ask
some pertinent questions about the crash and its aftermath: “Why was the Fayed security
around the princess reduced to one wholly inadequate man with no back up? Why did the
police not appeal for help from the public? Why was there no post mortem-autopsy on
Dodi Fayed’s body?”  Answers: because of the very conspiracy you dismiss, Mr Stalker.
One of the most important subjects to research if we are to understand how Diana
was killed, is the power and potential of mind control. I’ll give some examples. In the
1980s the best part of 30 scientists working in top secret projects, mostly computer
programmers, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances. Marconi was the
major company involved, but there were others like Plessey and British Aerospace. In
1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from
London to Bristol, a city with which he had no connection, and threw himself off the
famous suspension bridge there. A few months before, Arshad Sharif, a computer
programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and
hanged himself. Why Bristol? It is a former Knights Templar port and its name has
evolved from Barati, the Phoenician goddess. It just so happens that an elite unit of
British Intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they use the runway
at the British Aerospace complex to fly British and foreign agents in and out of the
country. I was called once, from what sounded like a plane, by a guy claiming to
represent the CIA. He said he was flying into the British Aerospace runway to sort me
out. “The Company (CIA) are not happy,”  he said. Oh, I thought, I am sorry, I do hope
they cheer up soon. I drove over to meet him just to check it out, but he didn’t show. He
was probably a guy who needed help, or perhaps they were seeing how I would react to
threats. Either way, they got the airport right. In that period in the 1980s, not only in
Bristol, there were strange deaths galore of people at the cutting edge of development in
the ‘defence’ industries.
What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Bristol
Suspension Bridge, and jump off? This may seem a long way from the Diana
431
assassination, but it’s not. I’m talking about mind control. A CIA scientist told me that
he was put through forms of mind control to stop him recalling his knowledge once a
project was completed. I’ll give you an example of mind control in a situation very
similar to the one in Paris. David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working in a very
sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and
changing his lifestyle. He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six
and a three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable
holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances. Although they are not so
mysterious if you understand mind control. He worked for Easams who, in turn, were
operating contracts for the Ministry of Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife
were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the
Special Branch. Then, on Saturday, March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was
going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t return for six hours. No-one has any idea where
he was, but I think I do. His wife, Anna, called the police and constable John Hiscock
was at the house when Sands returned at 10.2Opm. Asked the obvious question:
“Where have you been?” , he said that he had been driving and thinking. His wife said
that it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she didn’t think he
realised how long he had been out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days
later, on Monday, March 30th, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin
Maestro and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester,
to Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about his
demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good. But about 30 minutes into
the journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke,
he suddenly did a U-turn across the duel carriageway and headed at high speed in the
opposite direction to his destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour,
Sands then drove his car straight into a disused cafe building killing himself in an
explosion of flame. There were no skid marks. He had not even tried to stop.49 It is so
clear that during the time he was missing, his mind was being programmed and all it
took was a trigger word, sign, sound or action, and the programming was activated. At
that point he would have switched from his normal self to a man focused only on
driving into the cafe building and blowing himself away. The subconscious
programming overpowers the conscious mind and robot replaces human.
That, I am convinced, is what also happened to Henri Paul in Paris. Sands went
missing for six hours before he drove into the cafe. Paul went missing for three hours
before he drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de UAlma tunnel. This is what I
suggest happened in Paris. The Brotherhood networks were working through many
people and agencies to ensure that Diana was in Paris that night because, at its
foundation, the plan was to perform a specific Satanic ritual and the timing,
circumstances and the place of death had to be arranged in intricate detail. Diana was
under Al Fayed’s security web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of
the time in those last few days. Her conversations were heard and monitored
throughout by the Al Fayed bugging system. During his missing hours, Henri Paul,
432
the asset of French and British Intelligence, was being programmed for his role, or
perhaps the final touches were being put to programming already installed. Diana’s
ritual death was arranged from the very top of the Brotherhood and, by comparison,
people like Al Fayed are small and powerless nonentities, pawns in the game they
probably do not fully understand. The Mercedes which was brought to the rear entrance
of the Ritz had been stolen some weeks earlier - before the Diana-Dodi relationship
began - and when it was recovered it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing
outside the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the driver’s door was flung open and
the chauffeur pulled out by three Arabic-speaking men with hand guns. The vehicle was
missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels were missing, the door ripped
off, and the electronic system and equipment controlling the braking system had gone.
Al Fayed, as we have seen, controlled the company, Etoile Limousines, which supplied
the vehicle. No wonder the French authorities turned down the offer by experts from
Mercedes to examine the car after the crash.
When Henri Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to most
observers. The programming was deep within his psyche still waiting to be activated.
He may well have had a couple of alcoholic drinks in the Ritz bar, but his intake and
demeanour did not correspond with the later medical report. Claims that he was an
alcoholic also do not match with the examination of his liver. But if, as I suggest, Henri
Paul was a mind controlled ‘multiple’ he could have been drunk in one compartment of
his mind and not in another. I have heard from recovering ‘multiples’ who have
experienced this. Someone close to Paul that night, his handler, was switching his
compartments. In this way he could have had a considerable level of alcohol in his
blood while, in some compartments, he would have been unaffected by it. The same
with the carbon monoxide. Just before or just after the Mercedes pulled away from the
Ritz, Henri Paul was given the trigger which activated the programming. It could have
been a sound, a sign, a colour or more likely a word or sentence. With Paul’s
subconscious programming now overwhelming his conscious mind, he sped away to
the Place de la Concorde and down the dual carriageway to the Pont de UAlma. Rees-
Jones put his seat belt on, but apparently did not alert Diana and Dodi to the danger.
Thus they stay unbelted. As Paul entered the Pont d L’Alma tunnel at an estimated 80
miles an hour (some reports say slower), he braked fiercely, scraped the right hand wall
of the tunnel, and then aimed the car at the 13th pillar. It is the 13th pillar that gives it
away. The Brotherhood throughout history has had such an obsession with the number
13 that to believe this was a coincidence is taking chance to the level of fantasy. There
must be 30 pillars in that tunnel and the car hit the 13th because it was meant to. Diana
had an aversion to the number 13 and she would not allow a 13th lot in her dress
auction at Christies the June before she died. If, as some witnesses have suggested, the
crash was caused by the Mercedes hitting a white Fiat Uno or by a motorcyclist flashing
a powerful light into Paul’s eyes from a motor cycle, there is no way he could be sure of
hitting the 13th pillar. But a person with a deeply programmed subconscious would be
able to put the car right on the button, even at speed.
433
Mark Phillips is the man who helped to deprogramme Cathy O’Brien when she was
a mind controlled slave of the CIA. He has worked in these fields for much of his adult
life and after I reached my conclusions about the events in Paris, I rang him to ask if it
would be possible to mind control Henri Paul to pick out that pillar at speed. Mark was
in no doubt: “Yes, Yes”  he said “More than yes, absolutely yes” . He pointed out that the
subconscious worked much faster than the conscious mind and to the subconscious 80
miles an hour would actually be quite slow compared with its ability to think and react.
If the speed was considerably slower as some reports suggest, it would have been even
easier. “There are many techniques they could have used to programme his mind during
those three hours he was missing” , Mark said. The number of ways they could have
caused the crash, another vehicle, an explosive device, stun weapons, etc, etc, would fill
a book and any of them is possible on the face of it. But not if they wanted to be sure of
hitting the 13th pillar, which they did. To do that, they needed a driver with a
programmed subconscious.
I think the stories about the mysterious Fiat Uno and the motorcyclist with the flashing
light are diversions to lead researchers away from the simple truth. So much time and
effort has been wasted on the Fiat in particular, fueled by Al Fayed’s own investigation
team. Whenever such assassinations are staged, there are always a stream of false ‘clues’
and ‘leads’ which divert attention. The Kennedy assassination was full of them. Another
possibility for the cause of the crash is external control of the car. Randulph Fiennes,
famous for his polar expeditions, was an officer in the Royal Scots Greys and attached to
the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a secret group of assassins called the Clinic and how
they murdered people while making it look like an accident. The death of Major Michael
Marman is particularly relevant to what could have happened in Paris. He was driving a
Citroen 2CV along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW coming
the other way careered across the carriageway and killed him instantly. Fiennes says that
the BMW had been tampered with and the braking system was operated by remote control
which could override the normal system via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving
cylinder hidden in the engine compartment. The remote control equipment was operated
from a Volvo which followed the BMW, Fiennes reported. The BMW was driven by Sir
Peter Horsley, a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash. Fiennes says that the Clinic
knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as their target. In
his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to
about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing
up quickly behind him and as he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the
left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. This is
remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the 13th pillar.
Horsley was by now desperately trying to maintain control and he went on:
“Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My
car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the
road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, mounted the grass verge separating the two
434
lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see
a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous
force. In a split-second the driver’s horror-stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse
scream.” 50
It is possible that Diana’s Mercedes was externally controlled in this way, because it
is clear that the steering on Horsley’s BMW was also remotely controlled. Certainly a
highly skilled operator could direct the Mercedes into the 13th pillar. Support for the
contention that no other car was directly involved in Diana’s crash comes from Eric
Petel who claims to have seen the crash. Petel says that he was riding his motorcycle
towards the entrance to the tunnel when he was overtaken by the Mercedes. No other
vehicle was nearby. He said:
“I saw a car in my rear-view mirrors flashing its headlamps. I moved across to let it by and
it raced past even though I was doing about 70 miles per hour. An instant later I heard a
deafening noise and saw the accident. The car was spinning in the road... I stopped. There
were no other cars or bikes around at all and I could see all the way through the tunnel.
The roof of the Mercedes was totally smashed in. The right hand rear door was partly open
and I looked in and saw a woman. She seemed to have been thrown forward from the
back seat and had her head between the front seats.” 51
Petel said blood was flowing from her right ear and as he brushed her hair from her
face and placed her head on the arm rest, he realised it was Princess Diana. Her
eyelashes were fluttering, but she had not opened her eyes at this stage, he said. Petel
estimates he was at the scene for about a minute before climbing back on his bike to
ring the police. He told them that Diana had been in an accident, but they laughed and
told him to stop wasting their time. In despair at this, he rode to the police station in
Avenue Mozart. His lawyer, Antoine Deguines, says that Petel was kept waiting for 25
minutes and taken into a backroom where he was handcuffed. For reporting an
‘accident’? When eventually freed, he was told to follow a police car to another police
station where he gave a statement which he signed without reading. “I was outraged”  he
said “They didn’t seem to care about the crash.”  He heard nothing from the authorities
for months before he enlisted help from a lawyer to tell his story to the official inquiry.
Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The person
named as responsible is a ‘patsy’ or ‘scapegoat’, most often these days under mind
control, and diversions galore are created to lead investigators away from the truth of
what happened. The first method allows you to make an immediate arrest, or expose the
person to blame, and no further investigations are necessary because everyone knows who
was responsible. We have seen this technique with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan,
Timothy McVeigh, and now Henri Paul. It is endless. The second method, the diversion,
ensures that the crucial hours and days after the event are wasted as people chase a mass
of false stories and ‘leads’ .This was a technique used in Paris with the paparazzi, the
435
flashing lights from motorcycles and later the Fiat Uno. Also when people are fed a
constant barrage of conflicting reports and theories they become confused and a
confused mind switches off and loses interest. So first they tell you the paparazzi were
to blame, then they were not. Then they tell you the car speedometer was found stuck at
120 miles an hour, then they say it was found on zero.
I thought it strange how many American witnesses to the crash were quickly located.
The Pont and Place de L’Alma were not, before Diana’s death, a popular tourist area.
There is nothing there except a restaurant or two, a tunnel, and a maze of crossing roads.
And yet at 12.25 in the morning, several American tourists say they witnessed what
happened. The number of witnesses in general was unusual anyway, given the late hour
and the fact that Paris empties at that time of year as vast numbers of Parisians take their
annual holiday to the French coastal resorts. I can understand that some people in the
few cars travelling along the road at the time may have seen the crash and its immediate
aftermath, but I know from visiting the spot myself, that the main pedestrian routes have
virtually no view of the tunnel at all. The police failed to control the crash scene
according to normal police procedure and so much evidence was lost immediately. They
failed to question important witnesses and leaked some information while maintaining
unshakable secrecy over other areas of the investigation.52 It all stinks.
Today there is an added challenge for would-be assassins and assassination plots
with the ‘traffic’ cameras that are located all over cities. Smile, you’re on TV. It would
be impossible to keep secret the methods and personnel used to kill Diana if the whole
thing was being videoed. But when you are the Brotherhood with connections at the
highest levels in politics, police and intelligence agencies, the traffic cameras present no
such problem. You simply switch them off! There are 17 traffic cameras on the route
between the Ritz and the Pont de L’Alma, including those inside the tunnel itself. If
they had been working that night there would be no mystery, because you could play
back the whole event on your television set. One camera looks down on the entrance to
the tunnel and would have recorded any Fiat Uno or men on motorbikes with flashing
lights. But that camera, like all the others, was switched off at the crucial moment.
Never before in Paris had the whole system malfunctioned at the same time and the
police refuse to explain what happened. The system runs on an independent power
supply and it is controlled by the police and, ultimately, by the French Intelligence
agencies, because the cameras are there to monitor far more than just traffic problems.
At the same time as the camera system failed all the police communication frequencies
in central Paris also went off. Simon Reagan in his excellent book, who Killed Diana?,
quotes a contact called Andre’ who, like many people, loves to listen in to police radio
messages. Andre’ was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from
the Pont de L’Alma, on the night Diana died. He was, as usual, using a receiver to
monitor the police communications. But suddenly, at 12.2Oam, all the lines went down.
There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then, Andre’ said, the signal
came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once. “I
have never... come across such chaotic radio traffic” , he said. “It was extraordinary.”
436
When the lines went down Diana was leaving the Ritz on her last journey alive. By the
time they came back she was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the
emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few minutes of clinical
death. And there is not a shred of credible evidence for a conspiracy, is there, eh? My
God, it’s in our face. But within ten days of the crash, the French police had produced a
350 page preliminary report which assumed it was an accident and they did not
consider any other possibility.
Now, talking of that ‘emergency team’ brings me to another vital point. As a contact
on the fringes of British Intelligence told me, causing the crash is easy for the powers
involved, but you cannot be sure of killing your target. Therefore you have your people
controlling the medical team because, although your target hasn’t died, there is now a
credible reason for them to die. There has been a crash. The medical team’s job (or those
in charge, anyway) is to make sure that the target does not survive, no matter what
condition they may be in to start with. Even those who dismiss the idea that Diana was
murdered have questioned the astonishing delay in getting her to hospital when,
according to the official medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required
urgent surgery. The doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart
and this was filling her lungs with blood. Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to
death, if that is correct. The only way her life was going to be saved with such an injury
was through immediate surgery. So why was it more than an hour and a half before she
arrived at the hospital? Within a minute of impact, Doctor Frederic Mailliez with an
American ‘friend’ Mark Butt, drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private
investigator I know has made extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt and, while these
investigations continue, his findings strongly suggest there is more to both of them than
we are being told. The crash happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he
had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to
the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive and had rung the
emergency services. This man must be a seriously quick worker. He is one of 160
Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes
as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated accident victims
many times when he was a member of SAMU, the French emergency ambulance
service. And yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says that all he had in his car
to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and
her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU
emergency team, arrived to take over. He claims that Diana did not say anything to him,
but this contradicts his comment to the London Times that “She kept saying how much
she hurt as I put a resuscitation mask over her mouth” . Trevor Rees-Jones, the
bodyguard, also says he had flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back
of the car: “First it’s a groan. Then Dodi’s name was called... And that can only be
Princess Diana’s voice”  he told the Daily Mirror.53 How reliable that statement is,
however, is open to debate. What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious or at
least semi-conscious when Mailliez arrived. He told the CNN chat show host, Larry
437
King, that: “She looked pretty fine. At the beginning... from the outside, you know, she
looked pretty fine. But inside, you know, the internal injury was already starting... It’s
really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only part which was
still intact.”  Mailliez on one hand told a French medical magazine that: “I thought her life
could be saved”  and yet said another time that “It was hopeless. There was nothing we
could do to save her.”  He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed
woman in the world, and the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in
the tunnel, he had no idea that she was Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the
following morning. Excuse me? The pigs are airborne again. When the emergency team
arrived, Malliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do.
The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she
was trapped in the wreckage. This is a lie, lie, lie. One of the ambulance crew told the
French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana was lying with most of her
body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi
knocked out, but conscious... she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured
‘Oh my God’ several times.”  The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on
September 11th 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the
fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up. Another
official excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood
transfusion. This is another lie, lie, lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion
equipment because they would not know the victim’s blood type. When the ambulance
did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and
some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles (6km) to the La
Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the
scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate interventions’, one of
them within sight of the hospital. Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.lOam, an
hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened. By any medical criteria whatsoever this
delay was utterly ludicrous, unless it was meant to happen. It doesn’t take a genius to see
why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been no inquiry into the medical
response that night. Waiting at the hospital were a surgical team headed by Professor
Bruno Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are told, first heard about the crash while doing
his rounds. Is it only me that finds it strange that a renowned surgeon is ‘doing his
rounds’ in the early hours of the morning? Waiting with him when Diana arrived were
Professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, Professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart
specialist, and Professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in
telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told
they opened Diana’s chest cavity, repaired the vein, and ‘battled to save her’ for an hour
and a half before admitting defeat. I find this remarkable, also, because the autopsy
report apparently shows that Diana was clinically dead at 12.45am while still lying in the
tunnel. She would therefore have been clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before
she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of
the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having the body examined at a

later delivered to the Ritz. A little after 7 pm, the couple were driven in the Mercedes
along the Champs Elysees to Dodi’s apartment on Rue Arsene-Houssaye close to the
Arc de Triomphe. Here they unpacked and prepared for dinner. Again the back up
Range Rover was there and so was another car carrying bodyguards for added
protection. Why was this level of security thought necessary in the early evening, but
not in the early hours of the morning at the time of the crash? Dodi’s apartment is
known as the ‘Etoile flat’ after the Place de L’Etoile, the ‘Sun or star circle’ road around
the Arc de Triomphe. The route they took to the apartment was out of the Place
Vendome onto the Rue de Rivoli, and half way around the Place de la Concorde they
turned right onto the Champs Elysees and drove straight up that famous avenue to
Dodi’s apartment (see Figure 52). Remember that route, it is crucially important. As
they arrived at the apartment at 7.1 5pm, bodyguards were seen to rush from their car to
hold back six paparazzi. Diana and Dodi became concerned about eating at the
unprotected Chez Benoit restaurant and decided to head back to the Ritz to eat. They
took the same route back, down the Champs Elysees and around the Place de la
Concorde. The couple, with bodyguards Wingfield and Rees-Jones, walked into the Ritz,
captured by the now famous video pictures, at 9.47pm. As the paparazzi gather in
numbers outside, amid rumours of an engagement announcement, Diana has already
started the last three hours of her life. Who was feeding the rumours and the whereabouts
of Diana during the day to create the paparazzi stampede that dominated Diana and
Dodi’s movements and decisions that night? I think I can guess, somehow. Al Fayed.
424
And who were some of these ‘paparazzi’ making life uncomfortable for Diana, thus
changing the plans for the evening? The Ritz security video also identified a number of
people who had been outside among the onlookers for most of the day and were still
there on the edge of the crowd.44
Now the plot seriously thickens. After speaking on the phone with his father at his
estate in Oxted, Surrey, Dodi Fayed announced a quite ludicrous plan. To avoid the
paparazzi, the Mercedes which had been transporting them all day together with the
back up Range Rover were to be taken around the front of the hotel and used as a decoy
for the paparazzi. At the same time another Mercedes would be brought around to the
back entrance of the hotel to whisk the couple away to the apartment on the Champs
Elysees. Henri Paul, the 41-year-old acting head of security at the Ritz, was called on
his mobile phone by Dodi and told to report back to the hotel. He went off duty at 7pm
and by the time he returned it was 10pm. No-one has established where Paul was in
those three hours. Dodi said that his father, Mohamed Al Fayed, had personally
authorised that Henri Paul should drive the Mercedes. For me, that is Dodi-speak for
“My father told me this is how it is going to be” . Henri Paul was not a qualified
chauffeur and had no hire car permit. L. Fletcher Prouty, a former colonel in the US
Airforce who worked closely with the intelligence agencies, once said:
“No-one has to direct an assassination - it happens. The active role is played secretly by
permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has the power to call off or
reduce the usual security precautions?” 45
Absolutely right. If we apply Prouty’s rule to Diana and ask who had the power -
and used that power - to reduce the usual security precautions for her that night, we
have a rather interesting answer: Mohamed Al Fayed. Given these circumstances he
must answer the obvious question: Why was this security reduced? When President
Kennedy was assassinated, there were no bodyguards standing on his car while four
were standing on the one immediately behind (see picture section). He was also in an
open-topped car at a dangerous time in a dangerous city. When Martin Luther King
was shot dead at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4th, 1968, the
black police officer in charge of security for King was sent home against his will hours
before the shooting. The only two black firemen at the station next to the motel were
sent to other stations just for that day. The scapegoat for this assassination was a guy
called James Earl Ray. Not even King’s family believed he was responsible. So much
so that they attended his funeral a few years ago. When Bobby Kennedy was
murdered after making a speech at the Ambassadors Hotel in Los Angeles on June 4th
1968, again the security arrangements were tampered with. The plan was for
Kennedy to walk off the stage and through the crowd to the exit. But immediately
after the speech, Kennedy’s ‘aides’, especially Frank Mankiewicz, insisted that it was
safer for him to go out through the hotel kitchen. When he walked into the kitchen he
was met by the mind controlled Sirhan Sirhan with a gun in his hand. It is far more
425
likely that Bobby Kennedy was actually shot by members of his ‘security’ team,
particularly Thane Eugene Caesar, the ‘security guard’ who was employed at the last
minute and had endless connections into far right groups and the intelligence
community. But with Sirhan Sirhan at the scene with a gun, they had a mind controlled
scapegoat to take the rap and that was all they needed. Sirhan Sirhan had been on a
‘mind expansion’ course with the Rosicrucians in the weeks before he was implicated in
Kennedy’s death (see .. .And The Truth Shall Set You Free). Frank Mankiewicz, who
guided Kennedy to the kitchen, was a former public relations man for the Mossad-front
in America, the Anti Defamation League. He turned up later as head of publicity for the
Oliver Stone film, JFK, which claimed to be an expose of the assassination of President
Kennedy. It wasn’t. When the Israeli Prime Minister, Zitzhak Rabin, was shot dead by
an assassin in Tel Aviv in 1995, an extraordinary video taken by an onlooker showed
how Rabin’s security detail stepped back in unison to leave the assassin alone and free
to kill his target. You can see the pattern. And what happened in the crucial last minutes
of Diana’s life? They withdrew her security on the orders of Mohamed Al Fayed via his
son. That is a fact. All day she had travelled in the same Mercedes with the Range
Rover as a back up vehicle. Now she would transfer to another Mercedes with no back
up support whatsoever. This was an extraordinary decision for a man obsessed with his
own security. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said:
“Compared with the protection that Al Fayed affords himself, which is very professional, of
a very high standard, that which was afforded to the mother of the future King of England
was a Mickey Mouse operation.” 46
He added that “Al Fayed was absolutely paranoid about his personal protection” .
Just for him to walk around his own store, there would be three or four plain clothes
members of his personal protection team who travelled with him all the time, plus
another four uniformed security who would act almost as ‘outriders’ to create two rings
of security around him. That’s in his own store! But is it paranoia, or the knowledge of
the seedy, cesspit, world of arms dealers and Brotherhood fixers of many kinds, in
which Al Fayed constantly operates? People who think nothing of the mass murder of
children, let alone the assassination of a wealthy ‘yes’ man like him. Dodi Fayed was
obsessed with his security for the same reason. A lot of this security was also inspired
by the size of Al Fayed’s ego, to be fair. Mostly he recruited his body guards from the
SAS and the Parachute Regiment and used the Brotherhood operation, Control Risks, to
make recommendations. Tom Bower tells in his book about Al Fayed of how armed
guards at the Oxted estate hide behind bushes wearing full combat uniform and blacked
out faces. Whenever Al Fayed travelled in his Mercedes there was always a back up
Range Rover carrying emergency medical equipment and security staff, but now he
withdrew that protection from Diana. More than that, a new car was introduced for her,
another Mercedes was sent to the rear entrance of the Ritz, supplied by a car hire
company called Etoile Limousines, the same name as Dodi’s flat. Etoile Limousines is based at the Ritz and depends for its entire income on contracts with the hotel and its
guests. In other words, it is controlled completely by Mohamed Al Fayed and whoever
controls him. The new Mercedes was an S-280, lighter in weight than the 600 series
they had used all day and without the dark tinted windows. Other cars were available,
but this one was chosen instead. A director of Etoile, Niels Siegel, told the inquiry into
Diana’s death that he delivered the car to the rear entrance of the Ritz, but the
Dispatches programme showed that this is a lie. It was delivered by a driver called
Frederic Lucard and he can be seen doing so on the security video. Lucard said he
found it very strange that Etoile would allow Henri Paul, a man not qualified as a
chauffeur, to drive one of their cars. So why did they do it? Because Mohamed Al
Fayed told them to, that’s why. Brian Dodd, the former Head of Security for Al Fayed
in the 1980s, gave his assessment of the situation to Dispatches:
“It’s a new car that’s come into the system. They wouldn’t have had time to check that car
out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a bomb on the car, for
instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldn’t even have been considered. The back up
vehicle is there, not just to avert the paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a
pillion rider to pull up and shoot, or put a magnetised bomb on top of the car. That’s why
the back up car is there - to stop any of that. Why they never had a back up car, God only
knows. (I think I can offer a good guess without the need for Divine inspiration.)
“I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional bodyguards who I would
have had on that job and Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes Wingfield, after what I have seen
happened, would not have been in Paris that night.”
The Mercedes with Henry Paul at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of the
Ritz at 12.20am with Paul telling the paparazzi not to bother following because they
would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and in the front was Trevor
Rees-Jones, the former ‘Para’ with the reputation for being ‘fearless’. Rees-Jones says he
disagreed with the change of plan. He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal
practice because body guards need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at
speed down the Rue Cambon and turned right down the Rue de Rivoli into the Place de
la Concorde where it stopped briefly at the lights. The paparazzi photographer, Romuald
Rat, on the back of a motor cycle, drew up alongside them here, but he says that Henri
Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual carriageway alongside the River
Seine called the Cours la Reine. The car plunged down into one tunnel, came back to the
surface, and almost immediately went down into the very short tunnel at the Pont de
UAlma. Here it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of the tunnel
which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers. Henri Paul and Dodi
Fayed died immediately According to the autopsy report Diana was clinically dead
within 20 minutes and this was long before she arrived at hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones
survived the crash because he was wearing a seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing a belt when they left the Ritz
in accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a
photograph at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did not have a seat
belt on. But little more than a minute later when the car struck the pillar, he was
wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the belt because for some reason he sensed
danger, why did he not scream at Diana and Dodi to put their seat belts on? After all it
only takes a second and the whole reason he was in the car was to protect them. Rees-
Jones has some serious questions to answer here and he is giving no answers. Some
bodyguards do put a seat belt on when the car is on a fast road, but Rees-Jones is not
saying this. He says he doesn’t know why he strapped himself in. And if they were
going to Dodi’s flat, they would have been on the fast road for about a minute. All he
says is that he remembers they were followed by two cars, one of them white, and a
motorcycle, which is in keeping with the smokescreen story. But one simple fact about
the crash has been missed by all the newspaper articles, magazine features, television
documentaries and discussions I have seen, and by all but a few researchers. Everyone
is agreed that the couple were being driven back to Dodi’s flat near the Arc de
Triomphe when the crash happened. Well there is one glaring problem with that:
The Pont de L’Alma tunnel is not on the way to Dodi’s flat.
It takes you away from that area.
I have been to Paris and walked the route the car took that night, in fact I have walked
extensively around that whole area, and the route to Dodi’s apartment is the same as the
one they took earlier that night. You go to the Place de la Concorde and, half way around,
you turn right into the Champs Elysees and drive straight up to Dodi’s flat on the right near
the Arc de Triomphe (see Figure 53 overleaf). At that time of night it would take only a
few minutes. But Henri Paul did not do that. He drove past the turning for the Champs
Elysees, jumped the lights on red and sped down the duel carriageway to the Pont de
L’Alma. This took them AWAY from Dodi’s flat. I have heard it said that Paul was going a
long way round to avoid the photographers and traffic, but the photographers would have
been waiting at the flat anyway by the time they got there. What is most important to stress
here is that Henri Paul’s route was not the direct one to Dodi’s apartment, but it did ensure
that it took them through the Pont de UAlma Tunnel, the significance of which is fantastic,
as you will soon appreciate. Interestingly, it was after Paul went past the turning to Les
Champs Elysees and headed towards the Pont de L’Alma that Rees-Jones put his seat belt
on. He says he can’t remember why, but I can help him there. There can only be two
reasons for this. Either he knew what was coming or he realised when Henri Paul screamed
off from the lights that something was seriously wrong and he put the seat belt on to
protect himself. But again if that is the case, why did he not tell Dodi and Diana to do the
same? And if Rees-Jones had realised a potential danger, why had Dodi and Diana not seen
it and taken the appropriate action to protect themselves? I’m sorry if that upsets Rees-
Jones’ family, but given the circumstances these are questions that need to be asked.

[continued in next post]