Noble Realms — an open letter to Neomatrix

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2006-05-18T14:27:23Z

google wrote:

Why is it fraud if the nature of the monetary system is common knowledge ?

It seems I was wrong.

There is real fraud involved.

I've been reading this well written e book written by a fellow canadian about the banking system.

http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/mary_croft.pdf

What exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract because :

1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are
creating the credit with our signature);
2. Equal Consideration (they bring nothing to the
table, hence they have nothing to lose);
3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based
upon fraud); and
4. Signatures of the Parties/ Meeting of the
Minds (corporations can’t sign because they have no
right, or mind, to contract as they are legal fictions).

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-22T00:41:05Z

From David Icke Headlines yesterday

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For people who treat conspiracy knowledge as an 'add-on' hobby ...

'Those who know and don't act are more stupid than those who know nothing.' - David Icke

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T23:22:25Z

Im not asking anyone to change their opionion, thats for sure, Im just giving mine, someone had a go at David Icke, and I had a go at defending him, thats all... as for the f word, im not against it as an expression of surprise or something, like holy f***, or something, i just made an observation that the "tone" or the letter sounded pretty harsh, kinda mean... anyway whats done is done, opinions are opinions and i even felt a bit bad for critizing the letter myself even tho i was fairly reserved in my tone.

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T22:25:38Z

Hmm...I prefer to use it sparingly myself (well, almost never, in fact). Nothing wrong with the word itself, but when repeatedly used to express anger, it lowers the tone of one's expressions...as would any word used in a similar manner.

That said, I think Neomatrix expresses himself very well overall.

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T21:48:09Z

AwakeKiwi wrote:

Because you swear a lot, seem to posses quite a bit of anger and resentment and ego for that matter with regards to Icke. Im quite astounded at the content of your letter. I would suggest a person who uses the word f*** in the way you do isnt quite sure how to deal with anger or frustration at the world and you just dont get Icke in the way I think (its just my opinion) most of his supporters do. Perhaps you have done a dis-service by not considering this infinite love concept a little bit more yourself?!

Re-emphasizing this line:

Awake Kiwi wrote:

you just dont get Icke in the way I think (its just my opinion) most of his supporters do.

The ultimate irony here is that Mr. Icke devotes an entire section of his book, "I am Me, I am Free" to discussing the word f u c k ...and society's prudish uptightness in regards to **GASP!!!* someone using it. In a nutshell, he doesn't get the prudish attitude people have about it. He states that it's just a word, and is prone to tossing it about himself. So I think it's time to banish thee back to David Icke 101.

I tend to agree with that stance overall...although I do realize that society has applied a connotation to the word, and it says stuff about people who like, toss about indiscriminantly in any old situation, etc. ETC.

But really, when it's all said and done, it's just word....

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T20:18:11Z

Hmmn, I won't get drawn into further defending my original post at this point. It was an opinion piece, nothing more, and has already served it's purpose in encouraging discussion of the points that I made therein, rather than getting into a useless debate about why I made those points to begin with. Bottom line, my opinion is my opinion, and is not subject to change just to suit anyone else's opinion. If you don't agree with me, fine. And if you don't like my usage of colorful language, I guess that's okay too, although I really don't understand why anyone would get so up in arms about a simple word. But that's just me.

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T07:12:51Z

the last few posts, including yours...so tuned-in...well expressed.

Krazor's is the only one I don't agree with.

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T05:24:06Z

Jen..... who-how-why??

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T05:04:44Z

You guys kill me

kisses

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T04:26:29Z

Agreed, AwakeKiwi- reality is a "mass projection" or shared hallucination, depending on your inclination.

A simple search for "holographic universe" will produce plenty for initiation.

P.S. I read somewhere that some greys/ ets were amazed that we humans could remember every micro detail, everything's always where we remember it being, they thought it was uncanny.

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T04:11:03Z

Physical reality is a function/product of consiousness!
You got it round the wrong way.. to prove my point scientifically, read "The Holographic universe" by Michael Talbot or any new quantum physics and you will see that what we percieve as physical reality is really just waveforms and consiousness, our brain makes fourier transforms from waveforms into physicality just like a tv decodes via Fourier transform into a 2D picture on the screen.
Krazor said ..."believing that Jesus came back from the dead flies in the face of physics"

um... no it doesnt, in fact if you look at modern science, its all pointing to the fact that everything has come from a non-physical state. Watch the movie "What the Bleep do we know" to see what i mean.
these ideas of yours Krazor sound like self-limiting belief systems to me...

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T03:35:25Z

Martin is right Sowelu, your position is not defendable, it is belief centered and not proveable. Concsciousness is a function of physical reality. Not the otherway around. If 3d is imprionsoning consciousness then it's supposed to. The problem is the definition of 3d. To defy definition is the most difficult thing. What is a fast car? Not believing in a diety is not an unheard of way of dealing with 3d, believing that Jesus came back from the dead flies in the face of physics, and is not supported by the reality of 3d. Even if you hate it, 3d will continue after you leave this earthly plane. Money is like gravity, it doesn't care what you believe about it. Millionaires are also friendly, and are also a candy. It's the definition of human and human limits which is on the line. I refuse to define what we are capable of, but we don't live forever, we live when we live,and the money supplies the goods. Definition of existence is a real broad spectrum, all inclusive. God or no God, there is no contest, all of us together cannot piss off 3d. It doesn't care. If you think a million dollars is made by hard work and dedication go try it. You'll be disappointed. My favorite this week is that one never wants to underestimate the abiltiy of the other guy to get lucky. ta

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T02:12:54Z

AwakeKiwi wrote:

you dont have to be angry or mad at anyone for any reason. Infinate love is the secret for me to been happy regardless. And its not some airy fairy hippie day dream. Its simply a way of not worrying or fearing anything, for worry or fear will not help. Anyway those of you who know what im getting at ...Know what im getting at! Its a little hard to explain in words for me..once u get it, u get it...

I know exactly what you are talking about. Simple awareness of your true being and surrendering to it in everything that you do. When you know that you are made out of infinite love, then you may also realize that your entire experience is also made up of different variations/pieces of that same infinite potential.

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T02:07:19Z

Thank you Jen...
for that inspiring peice above "quoting Tobias, in Spirituality and Metaphysics:"

Re: an open letter to Neomatrix

2005-12-21T01:57:06Z

and lastly... (reposted)

Just a last point... as a teenager and in my early twenties growning up in this world i was a hurtfull, angry, jelous, bitter and often sad person, caring and easily upset, i was frustrated and fed up with all the hipocracy (excuse my spelling) and manipulation in this world. I am a completely different person now as far as my feelings and general understanding of things. Im happy, joyfull, caring, knowledgable and patient, generous and love all even those I once percived as enemies. Like Icke, I love all creation, even Bush, for if he is a being with a soul, a spiritual connection then there is much pain and learning to come for him. My life was very painfull, it can no longer be anymore. Im not afraid of death, of pain, of anything, as I do get it, the whole infinte love deal, what icke means by it all been illusion is that its not something to get upset about, you can do something about it but you dont have to get angry while you do it! you dont have to be angry or mad at anyone for any reason. Infinate love is the secret for me to been happy regardless. And its not some airy fairy hippie day dream. Its simply a way of not worrying or fearing anything, for worry or fear will not help. Anyway those of you who know what im getting at ...Know what im getting at! Its a little hard to explain in words for me..once u get it, u get it...