Kind of odd after reading you and Sedna bring it up.

Heh, maybe that's a sign there is definately more to this. Or at least to engage me to come and post about it.

I may be mistaken, but I believe that early on in the wave series there is mention of the cycles of 7, there is note of 7 densities. 

Every 7 seconds, 7 minutes, 7 years.  Observe the nuances when with say a group of people, and a pattern can be seen to emerge.  Rhythmic pauses in the course of conversation.  Look at the way waves approach the shore, they're not all the same but too have this cycle.  Maybe this is a "song" of sorts, and this "song" is universal in some kind of way.

"Each one of you are being asked to become masters of your own actions; to become masters of your own emotions; to become masters in balance and in love. This is not achieved by drawing away from humanity, and by separating yourselves. This is achieved by taking your actions out into the world. By taking your light to the darkest places, the furthest corners of the globe, and shining it there."

I had a dream this morning featuring the word "Rhode Island".   I couldn't figure out what it meant, but then it was pointed out to me.....road, island.   Road or island.   Two choices.   Because I've been feeling lately like I want to just shrink back from society and hole myself up in my apartment, appalled at the world outside and what society and people have become.  It's so disheartening at times.  I've been more and more hermit-like lately.   I suppose that's not good.  So what am I going to do........get on a road, and spread outwards, or isolate myself, as if on an island?   Choices.  Then I read excerpts from the links you posted, and it was definately timely. 

Another part that stood out was this, I'll explain why:

"…those of the "serve the self" polarity are about gaining power over others. For them, there is never enough power, as the lack of love in their hearts leaves them so empty of feeling that they cannot ever have anything but the most fleeting of satisfactions. In some ways, even those who control the world's resources are among the most poverty-stricken: despite their great material wealth, they lead empty lives, built around the acquisition of things - of inanimate and abstract things that can never give or return love - and they promote death rather than life. They may have the finest wines, the finest clothing, and live the life of kings, but they are also "slaves to their habit", insatiable in their need for more and more power, more and more of everything - a lonely existence indeed. These things do not bring them happiness. These things do not bring them joy or peace. They bring them cynicism rather than hope. They bring them bitterness rather than sweetness."

I just recently started a job at a Yacht brokerage, (reception / office work).   This place is in south Florida, selling million, two million dollar yachts to the super rich and elite.  I field calls from these people all day long.  Most are nice, and / or neutral, so nothing to complain about.  But every once in a while....I get these calls from some of these super rich people  and all I have to say is, I have never heard voices that were so dead and empty.   I mean, you can hear it in their VOICES.   They sound so dead, lifeless, monotone, flat, and low, like it's taking every bit of energy they have to muster talking to me on the phone.   ugh.    There's just no way to describe it.   Most of my calls aren't those types, but I definately get a few a week.   Then they come in to the brokerage in person to look at the boats, and their faces and eyes are hard, their eyes dark, cold and full of contempt.    They'll look at me and others as if we're maggots, just so full of nastiness.  We actually get that more often than the dead, lifeless callers.    It's been an eye opener being exposed to them all's over the past 6 weeks or so.  I thought I'd seen it all back in SoCal.  I was wrong!   

Oh, and I also have exposure now to all the magazines that cater to the rich elite, the most infamous being "The Robb Report."   Oh my lordy lord.   I was almost going to start a thread about what I saw in these magazines, just because it was pretty astounding the world that these empty vessel people live in.   I know we're supposd to envy it, but when I flip through those magazines it makes my stomache hurt almost, getting in knots, because it's so disturbing.   I know, what a strange reaction. 

So yeah, the above description fits these people to a T, and is also a much needed timely reminder of what I'm dealing with.   You almost have to seriously feel sorry for these people, like the link says.   They're so EMPTY.    Sure, we're all poor by their standards, but at least we have life, love and energy to us!   Yikes.

Polarity Integration
http://www.saviourbehaviour.com/polarit … tion1.html

Earth - The University of Diversity
http://www.saviourbehaviour.com/univers … sity1.html

Darkness     - Compassion for the Dark
http://www.saviourbehaviour.com/darknes … dark1.html

Darkness     - The Gift of Darkness
http://www.saviourbehaviour.com/darknes … ness1.html

Darkness     - The Nature of the Beast
http://www.saviourbehaviour.com/darknes … east1.html

Just being subjective I guess. I mean "negative atom". Let's speak in units of energy and have a scenario of comparing a black-hole to a star. Does the star exert precisely the same density in units of energy outwards as the black-hole sucks inwards? Does one negative atom = one positive atom? Or is there a difference in units? I'm not a scientist like you monty, so I hope you understand what my feeble mind is trying to express. Like does energy break down to two types (or more?)? Like energy dividing itself into subjective energy (that which a black-hole sucks in) and objective energy (that which a star exerts). God I'm confusing myself! I just keep thinking about how you bring up that there are not just linear energy but also angular...I would think angular would refer more to STO purposes than STS, and linear more to STS purposes than STO. Again, I feel a migraine coming!

I wonder if choice is even evident at the higher levels. 3D may be at the level in which our choices represent the battling between structural objectivity to the natural expression of chaos. I kind of picture the levels of density as kind of like a DNA strand. Two lines spiraling upwards, one representing STS and the other STO. As they spiral upwards, they transition from being wrapped together tightly to looser and looser until they separate from each other. They begin to express themselves in purity of their polarity and therefore act as natural repellants of each other. Instead of being on the same side of the equation like perhaps they are in 3D, they begin to act as opposite realities altogether (6th Density).

I would personally enjoy anything you can add. I have to admit this last paragraph needs some more clarification Tom, if you please.

What do you mean by "evil atom" - do you mean a unit of "evilness" or an actual atom that is evil? Because it takes individualized consciousness at the 3D level to even begin choosing between STS and STO evolutionary modes.

But, it's an interesting thing you bring up because this is getting into the subjects of:

causality vs synchronicity -- STS works through causality, but STO works through the divine flow which is more synchronistic in nature

spiritual gravity -- STS collects gravity (binds others' realities to one's own via control and subjugation) while STO disperses gravity (gives people the choice to decide their own futures).

spiritual mass -- STS collects so much "gravity" by increasing the hieararchy beneath them that at some point their great spiritual mass (not a good thing) weighs them down and slows their frequencies so much they become like cosmic garbage disposals, sucking everything in. Black holes are the physical reflections of this.

the trinity/triune/triad principle -- how the third is born from transcending  two, how neutral force balances the active and passive forces, how taking the third of two choices leads to progress, etc.... If this is unclear to anyone, I can gather some excerpts that will explain this. It's a very useful thing to know about.

I've thought, from most of my personal research, that balance is the key to all our questions of the purpose of existence, life, and the Universe. Balance being originally big banged from "positive = negative" and then subjectively translating to us as perhaps "good = evil". By the "=" mark I do not mean to say they are the same thing, but rather perhaps we can have this symbolize the "mirror effect", like positive is the mirror of negative and good is the mirror of evil. I like the way that sounds.

Can the equation be representative (hmm, it's 9:33...typical!) of actual units? Like 1 good atom = 1 evil atom (speaking subjectively). Or does one side sometimes have a higher density than the other, meaning that more than one unit of the lighter side has to be put on the pedestal to even it out? This topic was rooted from what Sedna said in the other thread: http://montalk.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=163

I think the above is incorrect as I think the mirror effect (opposite polarities) are of equal density of each other. But, who knows...

I was even thinking about how creation occurs. If you think about the C's and Ra, they say Humans are 3rd Density life-forms, but if you look at the whole 7-levels of awareness/creation backwards, we're actually the 5th level down.

7th Density - 1st level of creation (big bang)
6th Density - 2nd level of creation (pure polarity group-minds, meaning STO and STS are not intermingled)
5th Density - 3rd level of existence (purpose of experience zone perhaps. This level reminds me of a neutral zone where STS and STO can both reflect, however they are still separate)
4th Density - 4th level of existence (Physical manifestation occurs from ethereal-thought, hence gods to anything lower in levels)
3rd Density - 5th level of existence (Ethereal composition is lowered so that matter is the primary environment)

and so on...

Thought that would be a nice re-cap for some. Obviously my descriptions are quickly defined, so please don't quote me on this!