Christine

http://stuartwilde.com/Articles/SW_arti … shadow.htm

WR,
Christine B.

I'm posting this over here as it has to do with Stuart Wilde, however, it's in reply to a post of Lyra's on the thread *current events/goro adachi forum yanked*

I'd like to clarify my feelings about SW, as I perhaps have left the wrong impression.

I did mention I thought he had changed possibly as a result of his Ayahuasca experience. That he seemed more negative and more political.  I couldn't find the post where I said this to see what I said exactly, but I know I felt/feel that he became more out-spoken about the political scene.

From everything I've read by Stuart lately I do not feel though that he has become egotistical and I surely do not feel he has become someone who turns on his friends, supporters etc., as Goro apparently has.

SW's writings have changed, they are less "of the world" and more "out of the world" - God's Gladiators is a good example as it is quite different from "The Little Money Bible" for example.
But God's Gladiators really isn't all that different from "Infinite Self" or "The Sixth Sense" just further along into hyperdimensions.

I do not know SW personally, nor have I ever had any personal correspondence with him.  I know him only through his written word and one video I've seen.

I do know very slightly the gentleman who maintains an online bookstore for Stuart's work as well as for a few others.  In a conversation with this person, a couple of months ago, he mentioned Stuart had just come into town and left.  And that he's known Stuart for years...he said..."He's the sweetest human being I've ever met."

And that is my feeling as well, although I've not met Stuart.  He works tremendously hard to continuously stalk himself.  (very much like Tom mentioned in a recent post to BB about how he watches himself.)

Just wanted to clear up any misunderstanding I might have created.

WR,
Christine  B.

I got this as well - you must be on the A list then :-D

Did you get the feeling from this article that you had read something similar before?

Warm regards

JT

Here's the link: http://www.stuartwilde.com/Articles/SW_ … y.htm#read

Warm regards,
Christine B.

Stuart posted something new on his site about the guy in England in charge of their security.  It's quite satirical but I think answers clearly what was mentioned earlier in this thread about the ghoul war not being over, yet.

As I read it, the ghouls haven't gone away but are less able to "protect" their minions in 3D.  Thus the 3D dark guys are now effectively "on their own" and becoming less and less able to hide their crimes, as they are basically morons -

Also, as also noted on this thread and elsewhere - processing one's own shadow is vital to being able to withstand (but perhaps even benefit from) what is coming down the pike.  To this end, I recommend recapitulation (Victor Sanchez's book on recapitulation is excellent, as is Theun Mares' book "Return of the Warriors").

Christine B.

You wrote "But people make the opposite mistake - saying we need to hammer ourselves with the negativity of the world in order to evolve"

It is said that you can evolve either by grace or suffering. I would say that you just need to be awake enough to be aware that you have this choice.

I am not religious, but thought I would insert an example insofar as Mary Magdelena was said to have ascended through Grace and Jesus Christ through Suffering.

With regard to the highs and lows I would refer you back to the works of works of Hermes Trismegistus.

"Karma, put simply, is the cumulative positive or negative result from your thoughts, actions, and reality creating as that result affects your present reality."

"Time is an important factor here because the human karmic wave is on a seven-year cycle. Which means, every seven-years your general circumstances will change to reflect your actions from your previous seven-years"

So when you first start to clear out your Karmic debt, inlcuding the accumulation of both this and previous lifetimes there will no doubt be extreme highs and lows, which as you develop/evolve/grow will start to progressively ease off in seven year cycles - at the very least the manner in which you deal with difficult situations will change and thus their effects on you.So your perception could be that you initially evolve through suffering and then through grace.

JT

Do you think that constantly going between the gritty (which I call "the hard reality") and the uplifting brings balance, or is it another form of imbalance? As I said elsewhere, I have being going through constant "highs" and "lows" for a year, and the cycles accelerated in the past 6 months because I allowed the "lows" (knowing that it was part of the cycle). Because of this, my life is not what most people would call balanced, yet I feel I have made a lot of progress in my understanding so there must have been some kind of balance? What do you think? How would you define balance in that context?

I don't know the neat and tidy answer to your question, but here are some ideas floating around my mind:

- the uplifting tends to put the gritty in its proper context, rather than being a separate truth altogether.

- any particular truth seems to have both its gritty and uplifting side. For instance, any method to attain freedom is uplifting, but can be gritty when you view examples of all who do not know or apply this method.

- if you learn the gritty before the uplifting, then you'll experience a shock followed by adjustment. I learned about the NWO and alien conspiracy before I knew anything about metaphysics, so I became very depressed and doom oriented until I "saw the light" and realized the metaphysical reasons behind the conspiracy and the way out.

- if you learn the uplifting before the gritty, then you ease into the knowledge without the wild swing. Had I known the metaphysical background first, I could have read through the NWO and alien conspiracies without the doom mindset, learning just as much without the depression.

- truth is truth, independent of your chosen emotional reaction to it. So something that is gritty doesn't have to be emotionally shocking when you see it from the proper perspective. Getting that proper perspective means acknowledging the bigger picture.

- the proper perspective is one that activates the truth rather than hides or buffers it. Some uplifting material ignores the truth, tries to shield you from it, and says a threat is nonexistent rather than helping you become knowledgeable enough to avoid or handle the threat. So I draw a difference between uplifting "New Age Fluff" and uplifting "STO material" The first is hypnotic and sugary, the second is wise and empowering.

- the more you learn, the less wild the swings between highs and lows should become. When I began educating myself on these topics, the swings were very high and very low because I overreacted to every new bit of information with either overzealous mania or shock and depression. My worldview was the size of a nutshell, tossed by the waves of new information. As I learned more, the nutshell grew into a boat and then into a ship - the waves of new information then became proportionately smaller, and there wasn't as much swinging between high and low.

- temporary imbalance is one way of achieving balance in the long run when wild swings settle down to eventually reach a stable equilibrium, a steady rate of progress. But balance cannot be achieved by permanent imbalance - say studying the gritty to the exclusion of the uplifting and vice versa. Exclude the uplifting and you succumb from depression. Exclude the gritty and you step on the traps.

- So to sum up, I see two ways of reaching balance:  achieving it over time as high-low swings reach equilibrium as your world view matures, or beginning with a strong metaphysical background and taking the gritty stuff in context of this understanding. 

- But the way life goes, I think that we begin by inevitably swinging back and forth in our progress until we reach equilibrium (crystalization), then all that follows we view in perspective of our highest metaphysical understanding.

- For many people, however, this process is instead wild swinging between different ideologies and programs until programming crystalizes and one then views the world through permanently biased eyes. Depends on the type of education you're following: metaphysical education opens your eyes, institutional education can astigmatize them.

Hey Lyra, DHEA is a hormone!;) You wrote about eggs being enhanced with it and said they were omegafatty acids. I'd copy/paste, that function does not work on this mouse. Ever done a colon cleanse?

abraham / thook,

If I wrote DHEA, then I meant DHA, which does have to do with omega fatty acids.  That was a typo.  Here is a link concerning DHA, to confirm that it is not a hormone:

http://www.health-marketplace.com/Omega-3.htm

And, due to the minor bruhaha that erupted over the last link I posted here on NR, this is a disclaimer to explain that I am in no way endorsing the above website, I am only posting a link to it to use as an example to illustrate my point.   That's all.  Not endorsing the product, nor the ideas contained within the website, as we are all here to make up our own minds about things. 

"The definition of 2's refering to "fool" makes me wonder maybe I need to watch my steps? The above posts where I made a fool of myself comes to mind..."

Personally I would be more inclined to look at 22's as a power number BUT as with any power number (11, 22, 33) it would be reduced to a 4 in the case of 22 (to a 2 if an 11, to a 6 if 33) if the person doesn't rise to the essence of the power number.

And most likely it would be the negative of the 4 which would manifest.  The negative of a 4 is lack of stability.

When numbers "follow" me around, I try to stalk what was I thinking, what's been going on with me, or to be on the alert for something I'm currently unaware of. 

Taking it back to your posts about "the light" and your own confusion - which you mentioned - and then coming back to a focus, after Tom's posts, *could* suggest that indeed a lack of stability is what is/was manifesting for you, BB.  But, this is a very cool cuz, you are getting assistance from ?? to showing you something you might want to work on. 

Just my thoughts, of course.

Christine B.