<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Noble Realms — Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=1055</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.noblerealms.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1055&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11333#p11333</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>morningsun76 wrote:</p><p>&quot;That&#039;s it for now.&nbsp; If you missed the story I mentioned at the beginning about Windows XP as an intelligence tool, it&#039;s well worth reading.&nbsp; &nbsp;Go&nbsp; <a href="http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/10/298702.html">http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/10/298702.html</a> &quot;</p><p>Thankyou so much for this info.&nbsp; I have passed it on to others who have&nbsp; more cp knowledge&nbsp; than I.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ascension)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11333#p11333</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11332#p11332</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If ever I&#039;m writing what I know is going to be a long email or forum post, that I consider important, I usually write it in notepad and then save it after every few paragraphs. Then when finished I just copy and paste into an email or forum or whatever. I&#039;ve lost quite a few long messages and I know just how frustrating it is, so these days I try to make sure there&#039;s no way it can happen.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ayahuasca)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11332#p11332</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11331#p11331</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoa...I cant tell you how many times that crap has happened to me whenever I am typing something of critical importance in regards to our Matrix....There are times when I just have to laugh and go to do it on my labtop or something because obviously...&quot;It aint happening today...&quot;LOL...Interesting stuff on XP.&nbsp; Microsoft...figures....</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Menses)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11331#p11331</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11329#p11329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>All,</p><p>First things first: Just as I finished typing the following message, as I was adding recipients to the &quot;To:&quot; field (it was originally drafted as an e-mail, not a forum post), MY ENTIRE WRITTEN MESSAGE, except for a few irrelevant words, DISAPPEARED OFF OF MY SCREEN, with the Undo and Paste functions of no help, and so I had to retype the entire message.&nbsp; &nbsp;FINE, I&#039;ll re-type it then.&nbsp; Just earlier today I sent out a link to an interesting (and detailed) article on the government intelligence/forensic analysis functions built into Microsoft Windows XP (which I am indeed running at the moment).&nbsp; I know for a fact that I didn&#039;t delete the current message accidentally.&nbsp; This isn&#039;t the first time I&#039;ve been drafting words critical of the Establishment and my computer has hosed up in one way or another causing me to lose the work.&nbsp; But that just tells me that it may be especially important, so don&#039;t give up -- type it again.&nbsp; Luckily it was a fairly brief passage.&nbsp; To those Masters responsible for monitoring the computer usage, e-mail and phone conversations of average Americans who have done nothing wrong, all I can say is I hope you know damn well whom you&#039;re serving, because what goes around always comes around in the end.&nbsp; &nbsp;Anyway, here goes again.&nbsp; </p><p>According to Worldnet Daily on Rumsfeld:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>WorldNetDaily wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&nbsp; &nbsp; His complete quote was: &quot;I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples&#039; heads on television to intimidate, to frighten – indeed the word &#039;terrorized&#039; is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be.&quot;</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Now, if you break down the quote about different groups of people based on Rumsfeld&#039;s use of the word &quot;or,&quot; you get the following (formatting and numbering added by me):</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>WorldNetDaily wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>His complete quote was:&nbsp; &quot;I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if</p><p>1. the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or</p><p>2. the people who did the bombing in Spain, or</p><p>3. the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples&#039; heads on television to intimidate, to frighten –</p></blockquote></div><p>This could be interpreted as meaning that all those mentioned in group #3 are the same bunch.&nbsp; Now, obviously if Flight 93 was shot down, it was the US military that was behind it -- implying that they were also behind the WTC demolition, Pentagon attack and possibly the more recent beheading videos.&nbsp; But, those of us exposed to uncensored news already knew that; it&#039;s old news.&nbsp; For those of you unfamiliar with the subject, this form of psychological analysis of statements does have merit.&nbsp; &nbsp;What IS interesting is that after all Bush&#039;s other top people stepped down, almost at once, now the last major holdout, Rumsfeld, makes a statement like this all but admitting that 9-11 was an inside job.&nbsp; Continuing ...</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>WorldNetDaily wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>indeed the word &#039;terrorized&#039; is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior</p></blockquote></div><p> </p><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;(to accept dictatorship in the USA), </p><div class="quotebox"><cite>WorldNetDaily wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>to make people be something other than that which they want to be.&quot;</p></blockquote></div><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;(free and at peace)</p><p>Another important statement acknowledging the classic behaviorist Psychological Operations purpose of the 9-11 attacks.&nbsp; Obviously, the &quot;purpose&quot; is to get people to stay quiet and not protest things like secret arrests, indefinite detentions without trial, etc. ad nauseum.&nbsp; Well, who benefits more from this public reaction?&nbsp; Some mythical fanatic Muslim terrorist &quot;hiding in a cave?&quot; Or the shadowy bastards who are trying at all costs to deliver us to a technotheocratic, totalitarian World State?&nbsp; &nbsp; Anyway, this admission seems to be another sign that things are unraveling at the top of our system&nbsp; ... just as other major governments are also in turmoil and will also be forced to fold into a new planetary system in the coming decade or so.&nbsp; As I&#039;ve said before, I am personally not opposed to the concept of a world government; in fact it is probably inevitable and necessary to avoid an eventual nuclear war; but as far as I&#039;m concerned it had better be based on the absolute protection of individual rights, like the USA was supposed to be, at least in our highest visions; not based on the Illuminist/Communist/New-Man/Prison-Planet-nightmare scenario that these lunatics are hell-bent on imposing on all of us.&nbsp; I fully realise how remote a possibility that seems right now, but that&#039;s the way I see it for better or worse.</p><p>That&#039;s it for now.&nbsp; If you missed the story I mentioned at the beginning about Windows XP as an intelligence tool, it&#039;s well worth reading.&nbsp; &nbsp;Go&nbsp; <a href="http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/10/298702.html">here</a>.</p><p>Then, turn off your TV and read a book for a change.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (morningsun76)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11329#p11329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumsfeld's Freudian Slip]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11328#p11328</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42130"> Source</a></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>WorldNetDaily wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The Pentagon is dismissing a comment by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld regarding Flight 93 having been &quot;shot down&quot; over Pennsylvania, saying it was nothing more than a speaking error.</p><p>As WorldNetDaily exclusively reported yesterday, Rumsfeld, during his surprise Christmas Eve trip to Iraq, referred to the flight being shot down – long a suspicion because of the danger the Sept. 11 flight posed to Washington landmarks and population centers.</p><br /><p>Donald Rumsfeld</p><p>His complete quote was: &quot;I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples&#039; heads on television to intimidate, to frighten – indeed the word &#039;terrorized&#039; is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be.&quot;</p><p>CNN contacted the Pentagon for reaction to the WND story, and the cable network was told Rumsfeld simply misspoke.</p><p>&quot;A Pentagon spokesman insists Rumsfeld has not changed his opinion that the plane crashed as the result of an onboard struggle between passengers and terrorists,&quot; CNN reports.</p><p>Several eyewitnesses to the crash claim they saw a &quot;military-type&quot; plane flying around United Airlines Flight 93 when the hijacked passenger jet crashed – prompting the once-unthinkable question of whether the U.S. military shot down the plane.</p><p>The official explanation has been that passengers on the United Airlines flight rushed the hijackers in an effort to prevent them from crashing the plane into a strategic target – possibly the U.S. Capitol.</p><p>Although the onboard struggle – immortalized by the courageous &quot;Let&#039;s roll&quot; call to action by Todd Beamer – became one of the enduring memories of that disastrous day, the actual cause of Flight 93&#039;s crash, of the four hijacked airliners, remains the most unclear.</p><p>Several residents in and around Shanksville, Pa., describing the crash as they saw it, claim to have seen a second plane – an unmarked military-style jet.</p><p>Well-founded uncertainty as to just what happened to Flight 93 is nothing new. Just three days after the worst terrorist attack in American history, on Sept. 14, 2001, The (Bergen County, N.J.) Record newspaper reported that five eyewitnesses reported seeing a second plane at the Flight 93 crash site.</p><p>That same day, reported the Record, FBI Special Agent William Crowley said investigators could not rule out that a second plane was nearby during the crash. He later said he had misspoken, dismissing rumors that a U.S. military jet had intercepted the plane before it could strike a target in Washington, D.C.</p><p>Although government officials insist there was never any pursuit of Flight 93, they were informed the flight was suspected of having been hijacked at 9:16 am, fully 50 minutes before the plane came down.</p><p>On the Sept. 16, 2001, edition of NBC&#039;s &quot;Meet the Press,&quot; Vice President Dick Cheney, while not addressing Flight 93 specifically, spoke clearly to the administration&#039;s policy regarding shooting down hijacked jets.</p><p>Vice President Cheney: &quot;Well, the – I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft.&quot;</p><p>NBC&#039;s Tim Russert: &quot;And you decided?&quot;</p><p>Cheney: &quot;We decided to do it. We&#039;d, in effect, put a flying combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an airborne radar system, and tanker support so they could stay up a long time ...</p><p>&quot;It doesn&#039;t do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don&#039;t give them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it&#039;s appropriate.&quot;</p><p>Russert: &quot;So if the United States government became aware that a hijacked commercial airline[r] was destined for the White House or the Capitol, we would take the plane down?&quot;</p><p>Cheney: &quot;Yes. The president made the decision ... that if the plane would not divert ... as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to take them out. Now, people say, you know, that&#039;s a horrendous decision to make. Well, it is. You&#039;ve got an airplane full of American citizens, civilians, captured by ... terrorists, headed and are you going to, in fact, shoot it down, obviously, and kill all those Americans on board?</p><p>&quot;... It&#039;s a presidential-level decision, and the president made, I think, exactly the right call in this case, to say, I wished we&#039;d had combat air patrol up over New York.&#039;&quot;</p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (morningsun76)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=11328#p11328</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
