At Last! Unified Field Philosophy Revealed for Spiritual & Scientific

That's great. I read some of your posts and I am not a mathematician but I get the concepts.
A lot was through osmosis and reading Bearden's papers like how Bedini makes a negative
resistor out of a battery, etc... it took me a lot of reading over and over and over until I finally
got it. Everytime I was at Bedin's shop, he never talked in Bearden's vocabulary but he
understands all the concepts perfectly well. Of course, John, Peter, etc... constantly admit they
are also constantly learning as they go to since it is really a new science.

I do my best to tie it all together with very simple visual analogies and simple diagrams that
let anyone picture the concepts without the difficult jargon. Personally, I feel the most important
concept anyone can get from all of this for the general public especially is to get the difference
between open and closed systems. That one concept can cause a tremendous paradigm shift
in consciousness in how we view the world in terms of abundance.

Many green thinking groups, scientists, etc... are looking for "renewable" resources but the
mindset is still looking through a frame of reference that is based on science that only applies
to closed systems.

Hi Capitan,

Here is a Meyer's attempt that I did. http://www.esmhome.org/library/energy/w … l-test.avi
670kb video clip avi format. Meyer's was using voltage potential without electron current. There
would be an extremely small amount of current but the "energy flow" over the wires is what is
being impulsed into the water cell without inducing almost any electron current. Meyer's technology
really isn't all about magical frequencies, it is using voltage potential. Each different device built
according to his concepts will have their own resonant frequencies so there is no magic frequency
number. John Bedini's radiant energy circuits seem to be the most simple and efficient way to
produce clean radiant potential that can be pumped to the water cells.

The term overunity might need clarification. It has always meant over 100% efficient, then I
thought that it was to mean more output than operator input (over 1.0 COP) but still under
100%. However, the correct definition of overunity seems to be over 100% efficient and there
is no device that can be over 100% efficient when account for total input. There is operator
input and there is environmental input through photon potential in the vacuum, gravity, sun,
wind, water, etc... Total efficiency will always be 100% or under. However, comparing what
an operator has to put in compared to total output, the output can exceed what the operator
puts in. That would be over 1.0 COP. So, there really is no such thing as overunity, literally.

I would recommend starting with Bedini's schoolgirl motor without any energy recovery. Just learn
the concepts of the monopole circuit. There is more than meets the eye. You can build it without
needing a scope and you can probably do it for $30-40 easily.
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable … lgirl.html

Hi Capitan,

Conservation of energy will always apply in these systems when accounting for total energy in vs out.

However, the open systems violate Newton's laws of thermodynamics as any open system in nature does and anything with extremely sharp gradients (impulses).

There is an energy gain that comes from the virtual photon potential in vacuum space. There is a positive and a negative photon virtual potential. Anywhere in the circuit like the output where the impulses of the Heaviside flow is without virtually any electron current, that flow even though radiant will still dissipate some at resistances in the circuit like resistors, etc... there is a loss there... entropy... However, as the positive photon potential leaves those points of resistances, the oppositve anti-photon that is an anti-charge and time reversed is moving TOWARDS the resistane in the circuit and is negentropic. That anti-photon component of the virtual photons in the vacuum are where the extra negative charges comes from that helps to charge the batteries for example.

However, when getting into the advanced circuits... instead of pulsing the capacitor "filled" with potential and pulsed to a battery with the + to +, the + is connected from the cap being charged to the + of the battery being charged from the cap discharge. The discharge circuit is inverted and is pulsed from the negative side. The properties are way different and there is a larger gain than pulsing on the negative. Tom Bearden's book Free Energy Generation explains this in depth.

The school girl motor is the best to start with to get a feel for the circuit in general. For the water cell, I'd say just get the mechanical part of it together, output through bubbler for safety, etc... no matter what power source, the cell will be safe. The EASIEST probably to make gas with it is to get a variac and have the ac output go through an ac power cord and cut off the output end. Put both ends to a full way bridge to turn it to pulsed dc. If 60hz like in America, it will then be 120hz at about 110volts but I would turn the variac down to 5-10 volts and slowly raise it with the dial. The - to - on cell...you can experiment if you want - on the inner or outer tube and then have the + from the bridge to to the + on the + of the cell tube(s). Since through a bridge, there won't be a reversal in polarity since the diode blocks that. But you can put that + through an inductor to further restrict electron current and you can get higher voltage out with less amps pull on the power source. Doing it like that though you'll have a hot inductor but you can see the principles in action.

I wouldn't worry about using a radiant generator like Bedini's circuits until you get some experience with them and really upscale them. Using the plain pulsed dc style, you'll basically have a simple brown's gas generator, which is what Meyer's was making but just more efficiently.