War In Heaven (Page 9 of 24)

Io Pan!

Interesting discourse!  XzenTriCo, got a link for that text?

Separating the Message from the Man... Crowley.

As the Man was quite Dissonant in his own life, and the Myth created around him infinitely moreso, many steer clear or accept generalizations, making it difficult to begin to evaluate, much less digest, his legacy in occultism and philosophy.

My approach was to read all available BY the man before worrying about what was written ABOUT him, and I found much useful.

By that approach, the following isn't even neccessary. However I think it's worth posting, "for the younger bretheren"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREQENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS  ABOUT ALEISTER CROWLEY

{excerpt from chapter 0 of "The Magick of ALeister Crowley: A Handbook of the Rituals of Thelema" by Lon Milo DuQuette}

Bury me in a nameless grave!
I came from God the world to save.
I brought them wisdom from above:
Worship and liberty and love.
They slew me for I did disparage
Therefore Religion, Law, and Marriage.
So be my grave without a name
That earth may swallow up my shame!

-ALEISTER CROWLEY

Aleister Crowley is dead.

He died of natural causes on December 1, 1947, at the age of seventy-two at his residence at Netherwood, Hastings. His body was discovered by his landlord who reported that only moments earlier he had heard the old man pacing back and forth across the floor of his second-story apartment. There was no one with him when the end came; therefore reports that his last words were, "I'm perplexed" are patently false.

Contrary to many reports, he did not die a raving lunatic. He was bright and witty to the end. In fact, two of his most extraordinarily brilliant works, The Book of Thoth and Magick Without Tears, were penned in years just before his death. His last days were not spent in squalor and abject poverty. His modest residence in Hastings was a charming and reputable boardinghouse.

Distortions of the facts surrounding his death are minor compared to those that still surround the events of his life. But it is not the purpose of this work to systematically rebut the mountains of misinformation that still denigrate the reputation of this remarkable man. This has been accomplished admirably in a variety of well-researched biographies including the following works that I do not hesitate to recommend:

A Magick Life, The Biography of Aleister Crowley by Martin Booth, London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2000.

Do What Thou Wilt, A Life of Aleister Crowley by Lawrence Sutin, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.

Perdurabo: The Life of Aleister Crowley by Richard Kaczynski, Ph.D., Scottsdale, AZ: New Falcon Publications, 2003.

Even though the focus of this book is upon the importance of the ritual works of Aleister Crowley, I would be remiss in my responsibility to the beginning student if I did not at the outset endeavor to disabuse the reader who has perhaps given credence to the misstatements and downright whoppers that continue to be perpetuated by religious zealots and tabloid journalists.

Below are some frequently asked questions about Aleister Crowley. My answers are the result of thirty years of research into every aspect of his life; interviews with individuals both here and abroad, who knew and worked with him, including Major G.L. McMurtry and Dr. Francis (Israel) Regardie, and a review of historic documents in the archives of Ordo Templi Orientis, the George Arents Research Library, Bird Library, Syracuse University, the University of Texas at Austin, and the Gerald Yorke collection currently housed at the Warburg Institute of the University of London.

Frequently Asked Questions About Aleister Crowley:

“¢ Was Aleister Crowley a Satanist or a devil worshiper?

No. Although he can be misquoted (and quoted out of context) to suggest otherwise, Crowley most certainly was not a Satanist or a devil worshiper. There is no question that he seemed to enjoy his sinister reputation. It is also true that he loved to shock the shockable and was happy to allow anyone who was ignorant and superstitious enough to believe in a bogeyman devil to be afraid of him also. But in order to be a Satanist (by the most common definition during Crowley's lifetime) one must acknowledge the reality of the Judeo-Christian-Muslim spiritual worldview–a worldview that embraces the concept of a devil who is the all-evil opposite to a god who is all good. As Crowley repudiated Judeo-Christian-Muslim doctrines (including belief in the existence of their "devil") there are no grounds whatsoever to charge that he was a Satanist.

"The devil does not exist. It is a false name invented by the Black Brothers to imply a Unity in their ignorant muddle of dispersions. A devil who had unity would be a god."

It is true that there is much in the imagery of Crowley's writings that is dark and at first glance very terrifying. But if we view these works objectively, we find nothing in them any more frightening than the imagery we find in the Bible or any number of other religious literature, Eastern or Western.

Crowley especially despised the hypocrisy and the spiritually restrictive aspects of established religions, especially Christianity, and did not deny charges that his philosophy was anti-Christian. However, a careful examination of his writings reveals his profound understanding and respect for the pure spiritual impulse that is at the heart of all religions including Christianity. His allusions in his writings to Satan, Lucifer, the devil, and so forth are pertinent only within the self-referential documents of Thelema. They can only be understood and evaluated within those contexts and should only be disturbing or offensive to those individuals who for whatever reason are unwilling or unable to do a little honest homework.

“¢ Was he a Black Magician?

At the beginning of chapter 8 you will find a quote by Crowley that defines the term "black magic" in its strictest context. However, the common definition of a Black Magician is someone who willfully uses magical powers to harm others. Crowley was bound by multiple magical oaths to devote all his energies–intellectual, artistic, magical, and spiritual–toward the complete emancipation of the human race. His entire magical career, indeed his entire life, was dedicated to that purpose. He most certainly did not fit the above definition of a Black Magician. But, as I said earlier, for those unwilling or unable to do a little objective homework many of the magical operations Crowley chronicled in his diaries and books may on the surface appear to be works of black magic.

For example, if you haven't read enough of Crowley's works to learn that Goetic demons are "portions of the human brain" or that the "Hell" into which the magician plunges in order to conquer and command those "demons" is our own subconscious mind or that the curses and restraints the magician uses in particular forms of black magic are merely techniques to isolate, focus, and direct our own natural mental abilities–then there is little chance of convincing you that these exercises are not black magic and that those individuals who would try to better themselves by such spiritual practices are not Black Magicians.

“¢ Why did he call himself the Beast 666?

Crowley's father was a lay preacher of the Plymouth Brethren, a fundamentalist Protestant sect. His mother was also a devout (Crowley says "fanatical") member of the church. Together they did their best to raise young Alick in the tenets of the faith. However, the youngster was a mischievous and headstrong lad, and his mother equated his behavior to the rebelliousness of the devil himself. In moments of aggravation she called him the "Beast 666." He loved it, and as he grew up he delighted in identifying with the name and number as representative of all things joyously opposed to the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, and sexual restrictions by which oppressive religions would enslave the human soul.

As a young man just beginning his study of Hebrew and Christian mysticism, Crowley discovered that the number 666, rather than being a number associated with evil, was especially sacred to the Sun and the heart Chakra (or psychic center) in the human body–also called the Christ center.

To understand why 666 is a magick number of the Sun, we first refer to the Qabalistic diagram the Tree of Life and discover that the sphere of the Sun is the sixth Sephirah, Tiphareth. A kamea (or magick square) of the Sun is a square composed of 36 squares (6 x 6). The numbers 1-36 are then arranged in such a way that every row and every column add to the same number. That number is 111, and the sum of all the squares is 666.

6  |32|3  |34|35|1
7  |11|27|28|8  |30
19|14|16|15|23|24
18|20|22|21|17|13
25|29|10|9  |26|12
36|5  |33|4  |2  |31

Like other "blasphemies" he would hijack from Christian literature to express the dynamics of new Aeon concepts (i.e., Whore of Babalon, Blood of the Saints, Cup of Abominations, etc.), the term "Beast 666" was just another example of Crowley using concepts that in the past represented the unholy terrors of an evil future, and redeeming them so that they presently represent the holy mysteries of the emerging new age. It's as simple (and as unsatanic) as that.

Crowley explained why he called himself the Beast 666 when he testified in court in a 1934 lawsuit. I wish I had space to reprint the entire testimony.

"Did you take to yourself the designation of `The Beast 666'?" "Yes."
"Do you call yourself the `Master Therion'?"
"Yes."
"What does Therion' mean?"
"Great wild beast."
"Do these titles convey a fair impression of your practice and outlook on life?"
"It depends on what they mean."
"The Great Wild Beast and the Beast 666 are out of the Apocalypse?"
"It only means sunlight; 666 is the number of the sun. You can call me `Little Sunshine."'

“¢ Did he advocate or perform human sacrifices?

Crowley clothed many of his teaching in a thin veil of sensational titillation. By doing so he assured himself that one, his works would be understood and appreciated only by the few individuals capable. of doing so, and two, his works would continue to generate interest and be published by and for the benefit of both his admirers and his enemies long after his death.

He did not–I repeat–did not perform or advocate human sacrifice. He was often guilty, however, of the crime of poor judgment.

Like all of us, Crowley had many flaws and shortcomings. The greatest of these, in my opinion, was his inability to understand that everyone else in the world was not as educated and clever as he. It is clear, even in his earliest works, that he constantly overestimated the level of sophistication of his readers, and that he took fiendish delight in terrifying those who were either too lazy, too bigoted, or too slow-wined to understand him. Even when it is obvious that he is doing his best to be clear and comprehensible his never-ending allusions to classical literature, chemistry, esoteric doctrines, myths, and ancient civilizations send the average student flying to the nearest university library to discover what this man is talking about.

It is even more difficult to discover what he is trying to say when he purposefully veils the true meaning of his words so that only initiates possessed of specific information know what he is really talking about.

Such is the case when he wrote about sex magick. First of all, he felt bound by various oaths not to openly reveal certain secrets of sexual magick. Secondly, in the years he was writing on these subjects, one could actually be arrested for writing too explicitly about sexual matters.

Unfortunately, in part 3, chapter 12 of Magick: Book Four, Liber ABA, where Crowley attempts to discuss theories and techniques of sexual magick, it seems he was not satisfied with being simply subtle; he went out of his way to be scandalously misunderstood. For perhaps a score of initiates on the face of the Earth at that time, chapter 12 was an informative (and in places hilarious) essay on the theory and practice of sex magick. Among other fool traps, he uses the words "blood" and "death" and "kill" to replace the words "semen" and "ecstasy" and "ejaculation." To the unwary, the entire chapter reads like one big instruction manual on human and animal sacrifice. Big joke!

Nobody laughed.

He titled the chapter, Of the Bloody Sacrifice, and of Matters Cognate, and I'm sure he thought everyone would understand his literary blind when they reached the end of the chapter and read his last sentence: "You are also likely to get into trouble over this chapter unless you truly comprehend its meaning."

The footnote to that statement is even clearer:

"There is a traditional saying that whenever an adept seems to have made a straightforward, comprehensible statement, then is it most certain that He means something entirely different. The Truth is nevertheless clearly set forth in His Words: it is His simplicity that baffles the unworthy. I have chosen the expressions in the Chapter in such a way that it is likely to mislead those magicians who allow selfish interests to cloud their intelligence, but to give useful hints to such as are bound by the proper Oaths to devote their powers to legitimate ends."

I guess it didn't occur to Crowley that few people would ever read his assuring comments because the average reader was scared to death by the seventh paragraph:

"For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory suitable victim...."

[And its footnote:]

"It appears from the Magical Records of Frater Perdurabo that He made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 E.V. and 1928 E.V."

It should be obvious to anyone who carefully reads the chapter and its footnotes that the only thing to which Crowley was confessing was a great many ejaculations that did not result in the birth of a child. However, in 1923 when he wrote the above "confession," such candor in print could not be published. Ironically, talk of human sacrifice and other such shocking subjects could.

Martha Kuntzel, a Crowley disciple and high-ranking member of the German O.T.O., saw trouble coming and was understandably concerned that this statement would be misunderstood. She insisted to Crowley that the following "initiated interpretation" of his outrageous statement be added "for the sake of the younger Brethren."

It is the sacrifice of oneself spiritually. And the intelligence and innocence of that male child are the perfect understanding of the Magician, his one aim, without lust of result. And male he must be, because what he sacrifices is not the material blood, but his creative power."

Unfortunately, people who were only too happy to believe that Aleister Crowley could personally murder 2,550 babies didn't pay much attention to Kuntzel's "initiated interpretation." To make matters worse Crowley thoughtfully reminds us:
"But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best."

Thank you very much Mr. Crowley! I'm sure I will not be the last author who will feel obliged to try to explain your twisted sense of humor to his or her readers, colleagues, or mother.

“¢ Did he advocate or perform animal sacrifices?

Crowley did not advocate or perform animal sacrifices for magical or religious purposes. Besides indulging in the hunting escapades of a proper British sportsman, and the consumption of live clams and oysters, Crowley confessed to three other "murderous" acts:

1) As a boy, he killed a cat to test the validity of the statement, "a cat has nine lives."

2) As a young man, while attempting to "go native" in India, he paid for a goat to be sacrificed at a Temple of Shiva.

3) Before dining on frog's legs while camping in America, he performed a brief passion play before dressing the victim for the skillet.

Even though there are what appear to be references to the practice in some of the Holy Books of Thelema, animal sacrifice plays no part whatsoever in the Magick of Aleister Crowley.

“¢ Was he a drug addict?

Crowley's early belief that drugs could not harm the magician possessed of a pure enough will was dashed by the example of his own life. Crowley's struggles with heroin and cocaine addiction are legendary. At various stages of his life he was most certainly a drug addict. He also bravely overcame his addiction for lengthy periods of time and finally only needed his prescriptions to diminish effects of severe asthma and extend his life.

“¢ Was he a homosexual?

So ... what if he was?

(Sorry. I couldn't help that!).

Actually, Crowley was bisexual, and I believe he would be absolutely thrilled with twenty-first century attitudes concerning sexuality.

“¢ Was he a traitor to England and/or a German spy?

Charges that Crowley was a traitor to England and perhaps even a German spy stem from several newspaper editorials he wrote in New York City, just prior to America's entry into the war on England's side.

It must be remembered that the United States was very close to entering the First World War on Germany's side. America's large German population and other powerful industrial interests were winning the public relations battle in the press. If England was to survive, something had to be done to sway American public opinion to the English cause. Crowley convinced the publisher of the leading English-language German propaganda newspaper that he was a German sympathizer. He was given an editorial position at the paper and began to write the most outrageously bizarre editorials. He equated Kaiser Willhelm with Parsifal and Jesus Christ. He trumpeted Germany's right to rule the world. He even went so far as to write that Germany had the right to engage in unrestricted submarine warfare against the world's civilian shipping.

None of these things, I might add, reflected the German political or military foreign policy of the time. But it didn't matter. Soon Crowley's insane and blood-thirsty editorials created an anti-German hysteria that eventually swept the United States into the conflict on England's side.

His adventures in the Second World War are also interesting. The following is from my Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot.

"During World War II, at the request of friend and Naval Intelligence officer Ian Fleming,12 Crowley provided Winston Churchill with valuable insights into the superstitions and magical mindset of the leaders of the Third Reich. He also suggested to the Prime Minister, if reports can be believed, that he exploit the enemy's magical paranoia by being photographed as much as possible giving the two-fingered "V-forVictory" gesture. This sign is a version of the magical sign of Apophis-Typhon, a powerful symbol of destruction and annihilation, which, according to magical tradition, is capable of defeating the solar energies represented by the swastika."

British intelligence agencies will neither confirm nor deny that Aleister Crowley (or anyone else for that matter) was in service. Throughout his life he adamantly averred his patriotic loyalty to England. There is much evidence to suggest that he was and none to prove he was not.

“¢ Is it dangerous to study Aleister Crowley?

Aleister Crowley was by no means perfect. He was not good with people and often alienated those who loved him dearest. His bold explorations of human sexuality and drugs (always meticulously recorded and analyzed) are fascinating to study, but were never intended to be casually emulated. I have never encountered anyone who knew him that did not disapprove of some aspect of his character or behavior.

But he is dead. For us, only his works remain as a measure of the man, and thcy are currently more accessible to the general public than at any time during his life. His influence on the modern world of art, literature, religion, and philosophy is now widely acknowledged even by his most vehement critics. It is my hope that this book may help bring the wonder of his genius to a new generation of seekers and to an even broader audience of students.

But is it dangerous for some people to study Aleister Crowley? I guess I have to say yes. For those whose belief in a God of goodness hinges upon the reality of devil who is equally evil; for the superstitious, the ignorant, the lazy, the immature, the unbalanced, the mentally ill, the paranoid, the fainthearted; for anyone who for any reason cannot or will not take responsibility for their own actions, their own lives, their own souls; for these people Aleister Crowley is still a very dangerous man.
----------------------------------------------------------------

A list of MVL (Most Valuable Libers) will follow...

XzenTriCo--Thank you for your post and the link! 

I'd forgotten how engaging and clear a writer Crowley was.  His explanations of
the different branches of Magic(k) are, like his explanations of the various branches
of yoga, very concise and to the point, without unnecessary embelishments.

As Sgt. Friday on Dragnet would say, "Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts!"

And Crowley was never a "Satanist."  This is what the British press and other
yellow journalists liked to call him, because explaining what he was really up
to was beyond the scope of their understanding or that of their readers.

He was however a Luciferian," the Lord of Life and Light." To equate that with
satanism, which is merely a mirror image of Christianity is an ingnorant
mistake.

Yeah, thanks for the info ZT!  Had no idea who this guy was until a few days ago, and what he wrote about.  His description of the tree of life is very fascinating and I finally understand some of what the tree represents.

a new aha moment on the search/journey.  started out today to continue to look up stuff, mainly wanting to get back to the elf transmissions stuff, find out more, which i did and will show u guys that.  have some new info on it.  then, as yesterday, found stuff too good on the templars, initiation, goddess energies, and its weaving amongst flow, from real history.  i read a good one today--"one mans myth is another's religion"--loved that.  all this remembering, past live stuff, WIH stuff, ascension, and RE-Claiming the self.  the initiation/ transformation process, id be safe to say (and who wants to be safe?--not really necessary, but then...) is KNOWING THE SELF really really well.  that means the good, the bad, the stinky, the rotten, the beautiful, etc etc. (and reptilians hate stink/smells, hmmmm, theyre in us too).  so i found this website, and coinkydink--from the stuff on ELF.  now, aint that somethin!  it kills me to see how that works, totally amazing. too damn good.  going in ever repetetive cycles, circles, which i know is a good thing, going in circles is helpful, and cannot BE helped, from what ive found.  thats how it works, i see that now.  good ole thoth said so, and the darkness hides in angles, not to get going on that again, but theres alot in that as we know now, the angles/ANGLES to it all.  dig this=   THE BINARY SOUL DOCTRINE.  applying it to the WIH material.  apparently, theres that split, causing the trouble, or NOT?

the self is split, on earth, and apparently, in heaven, at death, THEY SAY--its a theory anyway, so then i thot, after reading this, below.  that its good to unite it, necessary to finally unite it, thru our eveolution.  ok, the joining together of self, if u believe in the split, and after all, there certainly is the duality thing.  ok then, the self UNITES and is NOT split on/upon death, and that always happened BEFORE.  but within/in/with this new deal a comin, it cannot, will not, be allowed to do that anymore, as EVOLUTION will stop it.  this time.  so this ascension deal, the CRATS cant get it all, or did they ever?  read this, and apply it to WIH, the NEXT chapter.  i think they musta got one or the other, either the soul, or the spirit.  kept splitting us, so each time we came back, the samsara/cycle repeats, its the frickin trap. its always been that way for many an eon. u die, u come back, split on death, split on return, and u keep going back that way, cant remember shit.  but u sorta DO ANYWAY.  mutterings. SELF-mutterings, u do remember somethin, but not entirely, its just bits and pieces.  u spend ur whole life then, gathering info, gathering back those itty bitty, and they DO grow bigger, little bits and pieces.  F'IN AAA--a life of being fed, and eating, kibbles and bits.===dogshit.  and thats why we're so damn mad all the time, we wanna fight that.  thats whats pissing us off.  we know we deserve and can remember BETTER.

D I V I S I O N  T H E O R Y
OUR TRAGIC PAST

A whole history emerges from the study of  BSD, the binary soul doctrine, a vision of humanity that recalls a tragic past and anticipates a glorious future.

The picture that emerges from the BSD suggests that, as surprising as it sounds today, death wasn't always a problem for human beings. The BSD indicates that there actually was a time, thousands upon thousands of years ago, when we didn't fracture at death. From one incarnation to the next, we would retain full possession of all our faculties, and remembered everything about all our past lives and histories.

But then something changed, something that affected our whole species more or less all at the same time, and that was when this dark curse fell upon us. That watershed moment has come down to us in our myths as the "Fall from Grace in the Garden of Eden", but it might be better understood today as the arrival of a great disease that corrupted our souls, a disorder that persisted within us even beyond death's door. That watershed moment has even been rediscovered by modern science, delineated in Princeton professor Julian Jaynes' seminal work "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind".

For the last five or six thousand years, then, our minds have basically been getting ripped to shreds every time we die. The conscious portion of the mind has been disengaging from its unconscious half, and each crippled portion has then gone on separately into the "next world". What actually happens is that the conscious loses its memory and eventually reincarnates, while the unconscious becomes trapped in its memories and feelings from the past, and unwittingly creates an imaginary heaven or hell dreamworld for itself out of those feelings and memories, a perpetual dream (or nightmare) it can never awaken from on its own. In the next world, these two cursed, crippled disembodied fragments of what was once a whole human being each experience a cruelly distorted reality, and they seem to be responsible for most of the reports we hear about ghosts and poltergeists, and maybe mankind's legends of zombies and vampires as well. In recent years, reports of near-death experiences and past-life regressions have documented numerous cases in which subjects reported experiencing their minds dividing in two during the death transition. Numerous modern psychics and mystics like Edgar Cayce, Immanuel Swedenborg, and Rudolf Steiner have reported this soul-division, and dozens of ancient religions all around the world once based their entire theological systems around this same premise.

but as a friend told me 2 weeks ago, the next time this happens, we WILL REMEMBER IT ALL.  my god, thats fantastic, and fits beautifully, thats why theres no manual when u come here, u cant know or remember who u were/which affects who u are, IMO.  that makes one less powerful.  AHA.  but thats going to CHANGE.  it gives no chance, only a semblance of those damn lessons ur supposed to know, feel, slay, get over, so as not to repeat.

For millennia, mankind essentially seemed trapped, doomed to remain stuck in this repeating cycle of self-destruction with no practical way out. Lifetime after lifetime, most of us would divide again and again, repeatedly losing everything we work so hard for in each life. While most new generations contained a rare few individuals who pursued a life of enough authenticity, integrity, and psychological health to enable them to "keep it together" during the death transition, the vast majority of humanity's masses were just going through the same futile motions lifetime after lifetime, never making any progress towards resolving our dilemma. In effect, we were trapped, and needed a hero to rescue us.  buddhists abhor that, call it the samsara, the endless repetitive.

In the meantime, this "disease"  ?virus?  has made us divided beings, and our world a divided world. Our division has come to completely rule the world. We human beings rule the world, yes, but our division rules us. It has made us collectively and individually insane, possessed of two alienated minds that seldom agree with one another. One side of our mind rules the day, the other the night. One side predominates among artists, mystics, women, and Democrats, the other among scientists, businesspeople, men, and Republicans. This war within our souls is reflected in our endless history of political warfare, and it is clear that mankind will never know peace on this planet until our inner conflict is finally and fully resolved, for the one is father to the other.  child of the man.

To complicate matters more, we each apparently also have numerous past-life selves hiding inside us, busily but silently dreaming away their own fantasies of heaven or hell within the darkest recesses of our own minds. Each time we divide at death, we add to their numbers, but we may not keep adding to their numbers forever. The day will come, according to the BSD, when they are all shocked into reawakening inside us again. And just as our whole species started suffering this soul-division at the same time, so too will we all be restored to wholeness simultaneously as well. This inevitable, horrific moment of restoration has been anticipated for millennia, and we know it as the ancient prophecy of the Universal Resurrection of the Dead on Judgment Day. or the ASCENSION.

THIS, then, is the "Great and Terrible Day of the Lord". "Great" because our dead will rise and we will regain everything we thought we'd lost forever, including full knowledge of all our past identities, memories, histories, talents, skills, and wisdom. "Terrible" for the very same reason: because our dead will rise, OR BE FREED from the theocrats, and we will finally have to confront and acknowledge the fruit of our own actions. those that went along with it,k made them bigger, trapped others. We will recall with our own minds, and feel with our own hearts, the karma that played continually and torturously out from one life to the next over thousands of years, inflicting payment of each life's sins on the incarnations that followed. "Terrible" too because many of our reawakened dead will be re-awakening from (their dreams of) hell, and will not be unaffected by the experience. And as the separate minds of all our past-life incarnations slowly integrate together, their experience in hell, will become our own.  or restated here--their experience in "heaven"...so this led me to think then, maybe thats why the crats, are so worried then, theyre gonna lose their grip, this is their last chance. theyre gonna make it impossible to get thru new gates or something like that, to keep the SOUL / SPIRIT SPLIT .  so we make it or we dont.  theyll not be able to rule anymore, or as strong anymore, and screw up heaven or the realms, or whatever one wants to call it, and send us back for more, so we can just go back in/thru the same dumb damn gatesagain and again.  thats why theyre hangin on so tightly, and as i said way back, that i thto i read and was on to something, that "theyre gonna try and make a big theocracy here on earth before the end"--like they havent already?  geez--its all over the place, they pretty much got er done, maybe.

ansd i just have to say this, and i dont know if u guys r familiar, but this so ties in, and i read it yrs ago.  that if a human is destroyed in a nuclear war, in nuclear holocaust, the SOUL IS SLPIT FOREVER.  forever,  and theres no easy way to get the pieces all rejoined, and unfragmented again, as the powerful physics, fission, literally blows it.  in more ways than one, it blows it. literally.  this sounds totally reasonable, and always bothered me.  i thot, then, when i read that, that omg--thats about right, no wonder theyd try and pull that.  what a totally awful trick to pull on humanity.  man oh man, theres some real TERRIBLE hate of us out there.  oh my god, and if im not mistaken, i think thats from the readings on the MONTAUK project, from their RV'ing and experiements looking into timegates, and reptilian adventurings, blowing time portals and all that.  then i got a message, a thot came to me, same one as from childhood, they cant blow this up, its not theirs to blow, other races, alien civilizations would be real unhappy with that, and would be forever affected by that, in the cosmos, and thats really the truth of that.  cosmic neighbors would have our debris on their doorstep.

with what is happening and to come, this 'split' wont happen anymore and maybe thats the crux of it.  thru all these initiations we do, to claim and know, and love SELF, we evolutionize, and they have no hold, like they did before.  we could call it BSD, alright, so how about Binary SELF Doctrine.  since soul, is really reflection=/is SELF IMO.  once again, we dont need any outside help--no out--side--OUTSIDE help. we need none this time, it was never, i guess, ever gonna come at all.  that must really piss them off, that we figured that out.  and we did it all by our little eeeny meeny mo selves.  hahaha.  read the next part if this is resonating...

http://www.geocities.com/~divisiontheory/  u wont believe the links on this page.  wow.

Primo !!!

Ran Some Snips Over To Here:

http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=3431
_______________________

Re-Member:

This Final LifeTime Is The Recapitulation:

As Empath > Dreamer > Shaman > Magician,

YOU Are Healing

EveryThing

NOW.
_______________________