1 (edited by tenetnosce 2006-10-31 23:16:25)

Topic: Logical Fallacies

Don't remember them teaching me about these in logic class.  hmm

cat ·a ·chre ·sis

   1. The misapplication of a word or phrase, as the use of blatant to mean “flagrant."
   2. The use of a strained figure of speech, such as a mixed metaphor.

hy ·poc ·o ·rism

   1.    a pet name.
   2.    the practice of using a pet name.
   3.    the use of forms of speech imitative of baby talk, esp. by an adult.

me ·ton ·y ·my

   1.   A figure of speech in which one word or phrase is substituted for another with which it is closely associated, as in the use         
         of Washington for the United States government or of the sword for military power.
   2.  In schizophrenia, a language disturbance in which an inappropriate but related word is used in place of the correct one.

syn ·ec ·do ·che

    A figure of speech in which a part is used for the whole (as hand for sailor), the whole for a part (as the law for police officer), the specific for the general (as cutthroat for assassin), the general for the specific (as thief for pickpocket), or the material for the thing made from it (as steel for sword).

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

Re: Logical Fallacies

tenetnosce wrote:

Don't remember them teaching me about these in logic class.  hmm

hy ·poc ·o ·rism

   1.    a pet name.
   2.    the practice of using a pet name.
   3.    the use of forms of speech imitative of baby talk, esp. by an adult.

4 sum resun ths made me thnk of txt speak.

neutral